Weird overrules?

LeftySpin

Rookie
I was looking on youtube and I found a couple videos of Nadal getting mad at the umpires. These are the only two videos that I've seen him argue can someone help explain the ruling on what happened?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fq8EuOlkIQ&feature=related
I thought the call was late on this one, but did Nadal lose the point because he gave up on the ball when he thought it was out? Even the commentators said it should have been a replay.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VywZYrxm1t8
The difference between this one and the first one is Nadal actual hit it back, but he still lost the point.

Can someone explain the ruling on these overrules? I obviously don't know the rules on replays and what not, I am sure there are a lot of things to account for, but now I am curious. Thanks guys
 
I was looking on youtube and I found a couple videos of Nadal getting mad at the umpires. These are the only two videos that I've seen him argue can someone help explain the ruling on what happened?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fq8EuOlkIQ&feature=related
I thought the call was late on this one, but did Nadal lose the point because he gave up on the ball when he thought it was out? Even the commentators said it should have been a replay.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VywZYrxm1t8
The difference between this one and the first one is Nadal actual hit it back, but he still lost the point.

Can someone explain the ruling on these overrules? I obviously don't know the rules on replays and what not, I am sure there are a lot of things to account for, but now I am curious. Thanks guys

if you are trolling, then i recommend you to stop. both of these can be seen as poor and bad calls. in the case of the first video, nadal lost the point because pascal maria thought that since nadal hit the ball into the net prior to the late call, he had no play on the ball.

in the second video, the umpire feels that rafa challenged the ball. people here feel that this was a poor judgement call because the umpire said "out". the point went to berdych because the umpire felt that rafa stopped play to challenge. in some ways the umpire was wrong, but in other he was correct because nadal clearly stopped playing as if to challenge.
 
Pascal Maria is a hack that should be officiating USTA 2.5 tournaments.

apparently the ATP doesnt think so because he's officiated 08 wimby and 09 AO.
im sure you had no hard feelings against him until he went against rafa.
 
Pascal Maria is a hack that should be officiating USTA 2.5 tournaments.

Every body makes mistake, the has made some huge blunders. However, you must consider all of the other time there were no mistakes. Is he the best? No. Is he very good at what he does? I sure as s$** would not want that job, as I don't believe I could do it.
 
apparently the ATP doesnt think so because he's officiated 08 wimby and 09 AO.
im sure you had no hard feelings against him until he went against rafa.

I have no hard feelings towards Pascal at all. His incompetence angered Nadal so much that it motivated Nadal to destroy Soderling after going down a set. He eventually went on to win the tournament.
 
The second vid, Nadal is definitely wrong lol. He stopped the point by raising his hand before the umpire's "out" call, so he incorrectly stopped the point on a good ball.

The first one is close, but to me, it still looks like Nadal stopped playing the point before the call.
 
The second vid, Nadal is definitely wrong lol. He stopped the point by raising his hand before the umpire's "out" call, so he incorrectly stopped the point on a good ball.

The first one is close, but to me, it still looks like Nadal stopped playing the point before the call.



Oh, here comes the BS again LOL
 
I have no hard feelings towards Pascal at all. His incompetence angered Nadal so much that it motivated Nadal to destroy Soderling after going down a set. He eventually went on to win the tournament.

That was awesome to see after such a stupid call by the umpire

While PM's call was definitely questionable as sometimes the audio/video aren't synced properly... Bernardes' call was flat out bad.

Playing Soderling, it appeared that Rafa heard the out call prior to striking the ball.
 
Last edited:
Oh, here comes the BS again LOL

Woodrow (or whatever you call the umpire member here) even said Nadal was wrong at the World Tour Finals.

The Wimbledon call is very close. I find Bud's attitude of simply presuming the recording must be out of sync to make Nadal right pretty funny though.
 
Woodrow (or whatever you call the umpire member here) even said Nadal was wrong at the World Tour Finals.

The Wimbledon call is very close. I find Bud's attitude of simply presuming the recording must be out of sync to make Nadal right pretty funny though.

oh? did woodrow explain how it turned out to be berdych's challenge if nadal was the one who stopped play?
 
Woodrow (or whatever you call the umpire member here) even said Nadal was wrong at the World Tour Finals.

I tend to agree here-- Nadal was clearly stopping play to challenge there (before the out call), and the ball was in. Whatever else happened, if Nadal stops play and challenges a good ball, he should lose the point.

The Wimbledon call is very close. I find Bud's attitude of simply presuming the recording must be out of sync to make Nadal right pretty funny though.

The video definitely is a bit out of sync--when you hear the racquet contact the ball is already well on its way. If you close your eyes and listen, the final out call and the racquet contact are basically simultaneous. So I think Nadal has a good argument here. He shouldn't lose a point on an out call that occurs at the same time as his swing.
 
I tend to agree here-- Nadal was clearly stopping play to challenge there (before the out call), and the ball was in. Whatever else happened, if Nadal stops play and challenges a good ball, he should lose the point.
Yeah but in that Case Bernades accepted Berdychs Challenge not Nadals and so the point must been replayed
 
Yeah but in that Case Bernades accepted Berdychs Challenge not Nadals and so the point must been replayed

No, the point does not have to be replayed. The umpire has the authority to say that Nadal had stopped play even though he accepted Berdych's challenge. The umpire has the power to do that. And he was correct.
 
if you are trolling, then i recommend you to stop. both of these can be seen as poor and bad calls. in the case of the first video, nadal lost the point because pascal maria thought that since nadal hit the ball into the net prior to the late call, he had no play on the ball.

in the second video, the umpire feels that rafa challenged the ball. people here feel that this was a poor judgement call because the umpire said "out". the point went to berdych because the umpire felt that rafa stopped play to challenge. in some ways the umpire was wrong, but in other he was correct because nadal clearly stopped playing as if to challenge.

I was just asking a question.....like I said I was curious, I'm sorry if you felt like I was being offensive in anyway. Thank guys, cleared a lot of things up
 
The comments in that second video disgust me. "this is what you should expect when you allow blacks to umpire.", "Nadal show his big arrogance here.", "misbehavior of mto. annoying player", etc. UGH, this filth should not be allowed on Youtube or any other website.
 
The comments in that second video disgust me. "this is what you should expect when you allow blacks to umpire.", "Nadal show his big arrogance here.", "misbehavior of mto. annoying player", etc. UGH, this filth should not be allowed on Youtube or any other website.

I find that too, seems like youtube has really messy members. Bad typing and bad thoughts too :o
 
The comments in that second video disgust me. "this is what you should expect when you allow blacks to umpire.", "Nadal show his big arrogance here.", "misbehavior of mto. annoying player", etc. UGH, this filth should not be allowed on Youtube or any other website.

Yeah. I am with you on this.
 
Back
Top