TennisManiac
Hall of Fame
Can anyone compare Ultra Cable to strings like Tour Bite, Confidential, Hyper G, Cyclone and RPM Blast?
i like your videos, assumng it,s you. the montage is good, music etc.Tour Bite has more of a pop and responsive, more connected feel than Ultra Cable.
Hyper-G has more of a gummy feel than ultra.
Ultra Cable had some good power but I found it hard to get a feel for that power and thus lacked control.
Confidential felt like way more control.
I want to give Ultra Cable another try, never felt like I wrapped my head around it but I think it has a ton of potential to be a good string. My experience with it was more of a muted, dumping into the net with so much grip, followed by an over powered lack of control experience after a few hours. I've heard it's softer but I found it to play stiffer than expected.
I found Tour Bite to be the most "pro" feeling string of the bunch.
Property | Volkl Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) | Weiss Cannon Ultra Cable 17 (1.23) | Difference % |
---|---|---|---|
Material | Polyester | Polyester | NA |
Stiffness (lb/in) | 167 | 175 | 5 |
Tension Loss (%) | 52 | 48 | -8 |
Energy Return (%) | 83 | 83 | 0 |
Spin Potential | 8.7 | 11.9 | 37 |
String to String Friction (COF) | 0.068 | 0.065 | -4 |
String to Ball Friction (COF) | 0.592 | 0.774 | 31 |
So according figures uc has nothing in common with cyclone tour. Why dont you compare it with the square Volkl string or Grapplesnake cube? I think the shape of Tourbite is different too. When just strung Tourbite 1.20 feels stiff and lowpowered and same spin potential as UC but it loses tension quicker and then more power and more pocketing and better feel. than UC. Uc is very durable and stays sharp long time. However take note UC is much thicker than 1.23 gauge round strings because it is square! So its notably heavier too.i like your videos, assumng it,s you. the montage is good, music etc.
i wondered if ultra cable is similar to volkl cyclone tour... similar stats on the tw db. I can probably answer that question once i string one of my racquet with ultra cable as i have it in stock. what stands out is the string to ball friction, might relate to your dump in net and sometimes great shot experience. volkl feels soft so if ultra is not then its not really comparable.
Property Volkl Cyclone Tour 16 (1.30) Weiss Cannon Ultra Cable 17 (1.23) Difference % Material Polyester Polyester NA Stiffness (lb/in) 167 175 5 Tension Loss (%) 52 48 -8 Energy Return (%) 83 83 0 Spin Potential 8.7 11.9 37 String to String Friction (COF) 0.068 0.065 -4 String to Ball Friction (COF) 0.592 0.774 31
I usually use Cyclone or V-Square which are easier on the arm. Ultra cable is good for spin but i have to string it really low. I string at 43 where i string everything else around 47.
I want to try a fresh set of UC vs. a fresh set of V-Square, but going by memory i think i like V-square better.
Nothing in common? Similar stiffness, same energy return, similar tension loss. Anyways doesn't really matter, a real field test is the true test.So according figures uc has nothing in common with cyclone tour. Why dont you compare it with the square Volkl string or Grapplesnake cube? I think the shape of Tourbite is different too. When just strung Tourbite 1.20 feels stiff and lowpowered and same spin potential as UC but it loses tension quicker and then more power and more pocketing and better feel. than UC. Uc is very durable and stays sharp long time. However take note UC is much thicker than 1.23 gauge round strings because it is square! So its notably heavier too.
For me anyway.So from what I am gathering.
The following describes Ultra Cable
Low powered
Provides tons of spin
Lasts a long time
Has a high launch trajectory
Is chuncky and heavy for its diameter
And feels comfy if strung really low
Does this pretty much sum it up?
not true if you can read the table above! only energy return is the same.Nothing in common? Similar stiffness, same energy return, similar tension loss. Anyways doesn't really matter, a real field test is the true test.
So from what I am gathering.
The following describes Ultra Cable
Low powered
Provides tons of spin
Lasts a long time
Has a high launch trajectory
Is chuncky and heavy for its diameter
And feels comfy if strung really low
Does this pretty much sum it up?
Can anyone compare Ultra Cable to strings like Tour Bite, Confidential, Hyper G, Cyclone and RPM Blast?
I got to play with this and have to say the string is really chunky. I bought the 17g and it was thicker than the 16g. Yes it provide good spin but feel was okay. It's very similar to Lynx Tour where it feels springy to me. Probably need to lower the tension for more control.
So from what I am gathering.
The following describes Ultra Cable
Low powered
Provides tons of spin
Lasts a long time
Has a high launch trajectory
Is chuncky and heavy for its diameter
And feels comfy if strung really low
Does this pretty much sum it up?
What does the package say? I usually string Poly at 48 and I strung this at 43.I have a set of UC that I want to string tonight in a Prince Beast O3 98. I normally string a full bed of poly at 48 lbs. What is the rec for this string - 45? or should I go lower? TIA
In a Beast O3 98? What is your impression of UC@43#?What does the package say? I usually string Poly at 48 and I strung this at 43.
I dunno. I used it in a Dr 98. I would say at 43 it is similar to cyclone at 48 but with more spin generation.In a Beast O3 98? What is your impression of UC@43#?
I have a set of UC that I want to string tonight in a Prince Beast O3 98. I normally string a full bed of poly at 48 lbs. What is the rec for this string - 45? or should I go lower? TIA
I use the regular Beast 98 that I normally string with Hyper G at 48. I just started using Ultra Cable, and at 45 it feels great to me. I love it.I have a set of UC that I want to string tonight in a Prince Beast O3 98. I normally string a full bed of poly at 48 lbs. What is the rec for this string - 45? or should I go lower? TIA
I dont understand your conclusion. UC is one of the deadest feeling strings anyway, so it cant get any deader than that. HOWEVER it is one of the most durable EVER too. Even the strings edges stay there for a very very long time. Its so durable because its much thicker than its 1.23 indicates. Its a square string so this 1.23 doesnt relate to its diameter because it hasnt got a diameter like a round string. Furthermore it has a different composition compared to most polys, so the "feel" is different. Its also very slippery which you can find in the TWU string database, so very good snap back.I felt ultra cable died too fast to justify its use
i really dont understand that some of you guys keep repeating that uc is such a rocketlauncher, when it isnt. The Twu data confirms that too. Maybe if you string it superlow which i didnt, than maybe it becomes more powerfull. i suspect some of you did string it much lower than you intended because of its is so slippery it could slip while you are clamping it during stringing.I'm probably on the 8th hour of UC and I can tell it just doesn't have the same pop as when I first played with it.