What are the implications of Federer's slam count advantage if he meets Rafa at AO?

[Prisoner of Birth]

Same could be said for you.

But I don't claim to be a female

 

[RAFA2005RG]

Rosol has already proven that he can beat Nadal on the biggest stage in 5 sets.

And then Nadal didn't play for the rest of the year. Did Rosol really prove anything, other than that he can beat an injured opponent? And the fact he needed 5 sets is far from impressive.

 

[RAFA2005RG]

If rock beats scissors, and scissors cuts every single other thing, then no one really gives a **** about rock. I think that's a fairly analogous summary of Nadal and Federer.

Actually every Roger Fedoper fan is obsessed with Nadal, so you couldn't be more incorrect.

 

[Clarky21]

But I don't claim to be a female

I AM female,DFTW,and doubting me has definitely given your double account away.

 

[RF20Lennon]

Actually every Roger Fedoper fan is obsessed with Nadal, so you couldn't be more incorrect.

And your obsessed with those fans and federer :twisted:

 

[RAFA2005RG]

And your obsessed with those fans and federer :twisted:

Nah, as everyone knows and regularly points out, most of my posts are about Nadal.....

 

[PCXL-Fan]

If Sampras was a little better in claycourt events he would have had a larger more negative h2h against guys like Bruguera and Kuerten.


Thus I am not concerned at all with Federer's 50% claycourt based h2h against the greatest claycourter of all time. Federer is certainly much more consistant than Sampras was in his peak years rarely unlike Sampras losing rarely to players ranked outside the top 5 during his 5 best years compared with Sampras's 5 best years. (Comparing 1993-1998 vs 2003-2009 in terms of consitency %)

 

[Prisoner of Birth]

I AM female,DFTW,and doubting me has definitely given your double account away.

Okay, is DFTW is supposed to be some guy called DjokovicForTheWin who's been banned or something? Why would you say I'm that guy? Djokovic isn't even one of my 5 favorite players.

 

[Mike Sams]

And then Nadal didn't play for the rest of the year. Did Rosol really prove anything, other than that he can beat an injured opponent? And the fact he needed 5 sets is far from impressive.

Rosol proved that Nadal mentally cannot handle losing to players outside of the top 4. Notice there's no injury news from Nadal's mouth when he's WINNING? :lol: He can't take his loss like a man unless it's against a top player like Djokovic because Nadal respects Djokovic. He won't give credit to lower tier players though.

 

[veroniquem]

Rosol proved nothing. Rafa got defeated by his knees (same as 2009).

 

[Mike Sams]

Just where did I namecall in my post? And your arguments are far from coherent,and reek of Nadalhateritis. I'll break it down for you:


Nadal - 11 slams
21 masters titles
More than a 100 weeks at #1
50 career titles
Future HOF,and megastar

Rosol - Zero slams
Zero weeks at #1
Zero masters titles
Zero titles anywhere
Zero fans(except gleeful Nadal haters)

Now,who do you think has to prove themselves more? The Mug who can barely make it out of qualies,or a legend of the sport with many slams/titles on his resume? I know what your answer will be,but I will just laugh at it because you're not the most rational poster around here,and cannot see the forest for your hatred for anything and everything Rafael Nadal.

Well...Rosol still is more popular than you, Clarky. :lol: Have you ever played on center court at Wimbledon in front of a packed house and beaten a legend and received a standing ovation?

 

[Mike Sams]

Rosol proved nothing. Rafa got defeated by his knees (same as 2009).

The bitter *******s coming out more and more. :lol:
Rafa was a bitter loser from the beginning when he bodychecked Rosol once he realized Rosol wasn't going to roll over for him. The *******s can't handle the fact that their beloved Rafa got stomped in the 2nd round of Wimbledon.
Bitter *******s with their excuses.

 

[Mike Sams]

And the silly *******s still don't realize that Nadal has always struggled at Wimbledon. Despite winning and making finals, he's struggled in 5 set matches against players like Soderling, Youzhny, Haase, Petschener and Kendrick. Why so shocked that Nadal lost to beast-mode Rosol?

 

[Clarky21]

Okay, is DFTW is supposed to be some guy called DjokovicForTheWin who's been banned or something? Why would you say I'm that guy? Djokovic isn't even one of my 5 favorite players.

He isn't one of DFTW's favorites,either. He is a raging ******* in disguise.

 

[Clarky21]

Okay, is DFTW is supposed to be some guy called DjokovicForTheWin who's been banned or something? Why would you say I'm that guy? Djokovic isn't even one of my 5 favorite players.

Double post.

 

[Prisoner of Birth]

He isn't one of DFTW's favorites,either. He is a raging ******* in disguise.

I'm not him but, by all means, continue to believe so. Atleast until you "dry up"