This is an interesting post. Long time before the Clash was released Wilson did make a 6.7 Pro Staff which last light blue with a bit of dark blue, thick beamed but very flexible which was very comfortable but a bit too light for me at the time and as I recall it was a frame that you would easily spray the bell off course. Probably today with the new strings you could have dialled it in. Volkl also was way ahead in the 90’s made the Catapult 10mp which is probably close to the Clash 98.Yeah man it’s so surprising to me that manufactures aren’t putting out more lighter flexy comfort frames that aren’t gramma sticks .
Babolat here me on this .. throw us a 100 sq midplus 10 oz and some change weight with a flex of 40-45 RA and just see what happens.its so funny ...
I used to have these same conversations at Wilson advisory staff member meetings..
I was like a broken record .. all I said was just give us a wilson surge frame make it wicked super flexible and make it light ... y’all will make coin ....
people laughed and pointed what a old school bafoon I was .....
Then all the sudden it came to me like this “ joey , it’s like nothing you’ve ever felt or dreamt of its a new proprietary system .. it’s a revolution!
It’s ....ITS ITS ITS
. THE CLASH...,
after one hit .. I thought .. yay .. they listened.. at least a little...........
I’d like to try prototypes too count me in! Especially for volkl . How cool would that be .. the only prototypes I’ve personally hit with were black out Wilson’s and color coded babolats . The way that happens is the local rep has the prototypes. Normally has you try the rackets for a certain amount of time .. and report back with your input on each frame .This is an interesting post. Long time before the Clash was released Wilson did make a 6.7 Pro Staff which last light blue with a bit of dark blue, thick beamed but very flexible which was very comfortable but a bit too light for me at the time and as I recall it was a frame that you would easily spray the bell off course. Probably today with the new strings you could have dialled it in. Volkl also was way ahead in the 90’s made the Catapult 10mp which is probably close to the Clash 98.
The second thing I find interesting was about advisory people. I know Wilson used to have them but wonder if they still do and whether the other companies do as well. I would love to be an advisor to Volkl for example. Is there anybody here on the forum who gets to hit with early pre production prototypes ( even before the car dazzle marketing prototypes) ?
The new Wilson Blade Pros.I thought I ‘d post a discussion on what people here on Tennis Warehouse Forum are liking at the present ( March 2021) with what the brands are doing.
From my perspective I’m a fan of flexible, comfort oriented frames, which is why I am enthused with what Prince are making at the moment the most.
I am also feeling positive with what Pro Kennex is planning with more releases to come with the Black Ace line and new Q Tours. ( hopefully)
Other frames I am happy to see that they exist which were released recently or last year include the Tecnifibre TF 40 line, Wilson Clash line and Ultra Pro, the Angell K series, Head Pro Tour’s and Prestige mp and new brand Diadem with their Elevate series. Also good to see that Lacoste is having a go with some new stuff.
Your thoughts?
I know it can be a polarizing change, but I really like what Yonex did w/ the VDM. Granted that was implemented in 2020 w/ the EZONE, but putting it in the VCORE line made it much more palatable (no pun intended). I've been using the VCORE 98 + for over 2 years now, and while I have adjusted, using the 2021 version during the playtest was a noticeable improvement in comfort.
Now, if they'd just release the new 98 + already...
man, you will change your mind as soon you will play against some heavy hitter with brand new balls.I'm starting to like lighter-weight racquets lately. I had previously been playing with 305g or heavier racquets. I have played a few weeks with a used Prince Textreme 100T (that I picked up a few years ago) and I have enjoyed the whippy and fast feel it had in doubles. I am going to go even lighter tonight with a demo of a Head Graphene 360 Radical S. We'll see how that goes. It seems that I might like generating more head speed, which is going to be different for me. I am going to give this racquet some time because I am sure I will have to adjust to it. I think what drove me to this was the disappointing session I had with a Head Radical Agassi re-release from 2018. It was just too heavy for me and it was humbling.
Probably. There are some big hitters in my group so I will find out quickly. I do have the option of adding lead, which I did with my Radical Microgel MP's back in the day. A little at 3 and 9 did the trick.man, you will change your mind as soon you will play against some heavy hitter with brand new balls.
I think any racquet should NOT be lighter than 295g unstrung which is the weight of Radical Microgel OS with only 315 grams strung - i think the Radical Microgel OS is the winner in stability/weight ratio
fantastic frame. but dont feel too bad about getting humbled by it. its downright cumbersome due to size and weight, and the string pattern is dense. i bring it out sometimes and let other people hit with it. people usually like it, but everyone eventually puts it down.Head Radical Agassi re-release from 2018. It was just too heavy for me and it was humbling.
I really wish FISCHER would get back into racket making again
Update on this Head Graphene 360 Radical S. I left it in stock form. I hit with some heavy hitters this evening and I was really surprised at how well I was dealing with pace. I think having a light racquet allowed me to get the head speed I need to make good contact at the right time, or at least a better time than I was experiencing with a heavier racquet. I didn't feel like it was being pushed around at all. I have it strung with multi at 57 pounds. It is probably just a honeymoon phase, but I am going to stick with it.man, you will change your mind as soon you will play against some heavy hitter with brand new balls.
I think any racquet should NOT be lighter than 295g unstrung which is the weight of Radical Microgel OS with only 315 grams strung - i think the Radical Microgel OS is the winner in stability/weight ratio
maybe you can handle it and maybe the racquet behaves a little different than my yonex dr 100 L with 285g unstrung. maybe the fault is a polyester string. It feels like a toy with this string - but the serve is awesome. very good racquet otherwise - if you can demo it sometimes.Update on this Head Graphene 360 Radical S. I left it in stock form. I hit with some heavy hitters this evening and I was really surprised at how well I was dealing with pace. I think having a light racquet allowed me to get the head speed I need to make good contact at the right time, or at least a better time than I was experiencing with a heavier racquet. I didn't feel like it was being pushed around at all. I have it strung with multi at 57 pounds. It is probably just a honeymoon phase, but I am going to stick with it.
Me Too ! Let's add it's fantastic at netHad a crush on the TFight 305 RS
Plowthrough, control and stability are just amazing. Best racket for slice in my experience.
Only downside is topspin
You should try the Synergy 98 then. You will lose a bit of power and gain a bit of spin. Slices will be just as good.Had a crush on the TFight 305 RS
Plowthrough, control and stability are just amazing. Best racket for slice in my experience.
Only downside is topspin
Thanks, interesting suggestion. It seems to me that the Synergy’s mold is very similar to the Beast 98, which is my current stick.You should try the Synergy 98 then. You will lose a bit of power and gain a bit of spin. Slices will be just as good.
I've not played with the Beast 98, but I do have a beast 100 which I love and is my secondary stick. Great choice on the beast 98s. They were very underrated in my opinion. The launch angle of an 18x18 pattern is definitely not as high as a 16x19, but is just a bit more than a 18x19 like the RS 305. I played with the RS 305 and loved it, and almost switched to it but I didn't like the fact that sometimes my shots barely skidded over the net when I didn't impart enough spin and the rectangular handle shape (That maybe due to the fact that I play with a 1/4 and had demoed a 3/8). That led me to pick the Synergy 98 as my main stick. I think Tennisnerd in his shot clock review said that the launch angle of the Synergy 98 is similar to a 16x20 . Since you're already familiar with Prince rackets, I would suggest you to demo one if you can. You may also try to reduce the tension or use a thinner gauge string in your RS 305 to gain some spin.Thanks, interesting suggestion. It seems to me that the Synergy’s mold is very similar to the Beast 98, which is my current stick.
There are a few differences though:
The Synergy is a tad softer, head heavier and has a higher SW. String pattern is 18x18 vs 16x20, not sure how different it is.
Since I find the Beast 98 very comfortable and I added a bit weight at 12, I doubt the Synergy would play very differently from my set up. That would be great to compare but where I live it’s impossible to demo Prince racquets. I took a leap of faith when I bought my Beast 98 racquets.
I have a Beast 100 too and prefer the 98 because it has much better feel and control. It is almost as spin friendly as the 100. The 100 has more power and probably a bigger sweetspot. I think it feels more comfortable than most stiff thick beams 300g 100sqin contenders.I've not played with the Beast 98, but I do have a beast 100 which I love and is my secondary stick. Great choice on the beast 98s. They were vert underrated in my opinion.
Exactly, I fail to understand the reason why the beast frames weren't as popular as they should have been. Both, the 100 and 98 offered a low to mid 320s swingweight which is about the same as their competitors, while being head-lighter(6 and 7 points strung respectively). That gave them room for customization as well. Apart from the weight distribution, the string pattern was also denser in the centre which made them more controlled than their tweener competitors. It seems that most recreational players buy frames that are endorsed by their favourite players without play testing rackets that fall in their spec range.I agree these frames were underrated, especially the 98. Although TW review was lukewarm at best, feedback from players was just great. My 4.5 tennis pal, who is demoing a new racquet almost every week was very impressed by the 98, especially with regards to comfort, which is his main concern.
The 98 being dismissed is quite ironic considering the number of players who pray for a frame that would be basically a softer Pure Drive, with better feel and more control oriented. I guess the Tour line ecplipsed the Beast.