He needs a brain transplant.He's still got time to improve on a few areas that are crucial:
Backhand - bit clunky, not much variety// needs more spin
Serve - placement
Biggest one is his strategy - he struggles to toggle between offence and defence
Too many UEs.He's still got time to improve on a few areas that are crucial:
Backhand - bit clunky, not much variety// needs more spin
Serve - placement
Biggest one is his strategy - he struggles to toggle between offence and defence
But it is, executed well, a great way to disrupt the rythm of a baseliner to give a different contact point and to draw a shorter ball which than can be attacked. This again is a little piece of point construction which every Tour player should have is his arsenalThe slice as a weapon? How? A slice winner is uncommon.
You have already answered. IMO, the biggest advantage of Novak Djokovic is his incredibly accurate timing, when to switch from defense to offensive play. He waits, waits, waits, waits and attacks on first reasonable oportunity. I get the impression that he does that better than everyone else. That's why his play seems the most rational for winning.Biggest one is his strategy - he struggles to toggle between offence and defence
Alky in NYT: "I know I can beat Djok"Alcaraz always strikes me as overly confident, like he’s going into matches thinking it’ll be a piece of cake. I think that works against him.
Serve & return.He's still got time to improve on a few areas that are crucial:
Backhand - bit clunky, not much variety// needs more spin
Serve - placement
Biggest one is his strategy - he struggles to toggle between offence and defence
He may always be this way. I saw a few points.He needs a brain transplant.
Tbh if I was as talented as he is, I'd do exact the same. Matter of fact, I'd talk more trash than Kyrgios lolAlcaraz always strikes me as overly confident, like he’s going into matches thinking it’ll be a piece of cake. I think that works against him.
That was really weird. Can't think of any other top 100 player that wouldn't have smashed that ball. Not only, the forehand he hit was college level, and just put Novak neutral in the point again.They keep showing that point where Djokovic throws up a desperation lob and rather than hit an overhead Alcaraz waits for it to drop and hits a forehand. That was just dumb. I think Djokovic knows that as long as he just keep the ball in play and plays the retriever game Alcaraz will donate errors. This strategy is perfect for the slow Australian night conditions. I don’t think that there’s any doubt that Sinner is better than Alcaraz from the baseline. Sinner will be much tougher for Djokovic.
Though that rally was a treat to watch. Alcaraz should have won that at least 3 times during the rally and eventually he was fighting for neutrality in the rally. Can’t say he did much wrong apart from probably the overhead which he made a forehand, even that he did hit deep in backhand of Djokovic.They keep showing that point where Djokovic throws up a desperation lob and rather than hit an overhead Alcaraz waits for it to drop and hits a forehand. That was just dumb. I think Djokovic knows that as long as he just keeps the ball in play and plays the retriever game Alcaraz will donate errors. This strategy is perfect for the slow Australian night conditions. I don’t think that there’s any doubt that Sinner is better than Alcaraz from the baseline. Sinner will be much tougher for Djokovic.
Federer or Nadal hit an overhead to win that point outright. You don’t let a mid court lob drop to hit a forehand. Even if the lob landed on the baseline Federer and and Nadal would have hit an overhead.Though that rally was a treat to watch. Alcaraz should have won that at least 3 times during the rally and eventually he was fighting for neutrality in the rally. Can’t say he did much wrong apart from probably the overhead which he made a forehand, even that he did hit deep in backhand of Djokovic.
His serve does no harm to players like Djokovic on this surface.He's still got time to improve on a few areas that are crucial:
Backhand - bit clunky, not much variety// needs more spin
Serve - placement
Biggest one is his strategy - he struggles to toggle between offence and defence
You're asking a lot of this generation of social media addicts.Getting a brain would be a good start...
What in the cringe did I just readAlcaraz's match against Djokovic was very reminiscent of the Federer vs Djokovic matches of old.
Fed was a beach ball. Everybody loves a beach ball. It reminds them of the beach. And when encountered at the beach, it's a wonderful and fun experience that really encapsulates the leisurely activity of beach-going. The beach ball is the beach, and Fed is/was Tennis.
But what happens when that beach ball gets sucked out by the tide? Well. It's got nothing. It wont be coming back, at least not by its own effort. Alcaraz must be careful not to become a predetermined dimension. As popular as he is becoming, he must not allow himself to become tennis. If this happens, he'll become predictable.
Djokovic, on the other hand, never fit into the mold of the predictable. Because of this, he has never been seen as the amalgamation of "Tennis". Djokovic is a guy who raises the stakes. He doesn't care. He is the wave crashing down on the beach. Relentless. Strong. Overwhelming. Ever Changing. He is the tide that disposses you of your beach ball, your beach towel, your sunglasses, your flip flops. If Alcaraz is not careful, he'll just become another beach ball in the bay. Amounting to nothing more than litter in an ocean of nothingness. Sure you can beat the ocean at times. But not for very long.
There's no change that can meaningfully contribute to his chances of beating Djokovic when Djokovic is at his best. Except that he becomes like him in all the ways mentioned.
"To be formless like water".
![]()
Federer or Nadal hit an overhead to win that point outright. You don’t let a mid court lob drop to hit a forehand. Even if the lob landed on the baseline Federer and and Nadal would have hit an overhead.
There is a similarly hilarious video of Federer.lol - that’s your dear Nadal missing lob after lob after lob.
Stop overhyping a retired player. Lol
Nadal has one of the best overheads of all time next to Federer. Your comment is ridiculous.lol - that’s your dear Nadal missing lob after lob after lob.
Stop overhyping a retired player. Lol
That backhand by Nadal in the Australian Open final cost him the title or at least the chance to serve for the championship against his nemesis.lol - that’s your dear Nadal missing lob after lob after lob.
Stop overhyping a retired player. Lol
100% Alcaraz has no rally mode.His serve does no harm to players like Djokovic on this surface.
Furthermore, he should focus more on using a safe hitting tactic from the baseline like the Serb does and not go for the immediate winner.
Alcaraz ends up making rookie mistakes, he still has a lot to learn in his game.
![]()
Not really necessary.More height.
Yeah, I mean there's always scope to tighten up errors, but this was his least erratic performance yet against Djokovic on hard courts. By a pretty good margin. The trend is in the right direction.Alcaraz hit 50 winners and 40 unforced errors against Djokovic. I don't think the problem was him spraying unforced errors all over the place.
Nadal has one of the best overheads of all time next to Federer. Your comment is ridiculous.
Haha, I so agree. This loss has changed something for me and my belief in Raz’ abilities to master hardcourts in the most intelligent way going forward. Maybe it’s really time for a new coach. Andy Murray would be a great guy to sharpen his tactical abilities. I see no HC progress under JCFFeeling ashamed to be manhandled by a legless Novak should be a change.
No doubting the talent. He has what it takes but it looks like finally someone in the Alcaraz camp (the father) has woken up and said enough is enough with the coaching staff.Haha, I so agree. This loss has changed something for me and my belief in Raz’ abilities to master hardcourts in the most intelligent way going forward. Maybe it’s really time for a new coach. Andy Murray would be a great guy to sharpen his tactical abilities. I see no HC progress under JCF
You mean someone has woken up or should wake up?No doubting the talent. He has what it takes but it looks like finally someone in the Alcaraz camp (the father) has woken up and said enough is enough with the coaching staff.
JCF is long past his sell by date.
They should, but there are also reports that Papacaraz is displeased with the crossroads Carlos is at.You mean someone has woken up or should wake up?
I am not sure he needs the rally mode100% Alcaraz has no rally mode.
Djokovic on the other hand, only he can perfect the art of rallying like he does, keeping it deep and consistent.