VolleyHelena
Semi-Pro
Federer - Stubborn/Not clutch at crucial moments which have costed him slams
Let's hope that doesn't happenThe most disliked feature of the most liked player of the world is that he has a losing H2H record to You Know Who, and may also have lost the slams record to him when it's all said and done.
Not clutch at crucial moments? He is extremely clutch. How do you think he's won 19 Majors if he isn't clutch?Federer - Stubborn/Not clutch at crucial moments which have costed him slams
Not clutch at crucial moments? He is extremely clutch. How do you think he's won 19 Majors if he isn't clutch?
I know, but that could happen to any legendary/ATG player. Borg, Nadal, Sampras, Djokovic...they all lost some Major finals by being flat in crucial moments. I agree that Nadal (or Borg, for that matter) is mentally stronger, but the difference is really marginal.BP conversion is awful and lost some slam finals because of playing big points awfully
I’m not interested in clothing styles at all myself, but I don’t like those celebrity shows as well (like the golden handbag at Wimbledon etc.) Also being around rich and prominent people so often is nothing I adore (unless they are real personal friends of course).Federer: that he puts up with the cheating of Humbalito and that he is walking the dangerous line between being a celebrity and being an icon with the former leading to some really poor choices in clothing.
No, he is not clutch, he should have many more than 19 if he was.Not clutch at crucial moments? He is extremely clutch. How do you think he's won 19 Majors if he isn't clutch?
Perfectly said.Federer - Stubborn/Not clutch at crucial moments which have costed him slams
This notion that Fed is a 'mentally weak' player is a bunch of horsesh*t. How do people even make such a judgement.
Saying a player is mentally weak- or mentally strong- is just a very poor, lazy, inadequate, terribly unimaginative way of describing sports.
No it isn't. And no one is making the blanket statement, "Roger Federer is mentally weak," the salient point is he has a long and undisputed history of being mentally weak against Nadal, and later on, against Djokovic.
How can you (or anyone) dispute that Fed was mentally weak in countless matches against Nadal? I'm not going to bother digging up the exact stats of blown MP's or going 3/24 on BP's in countless blown matches. I'll cover some egregious examples of matches where Fed should have won and blew endless chances to win. I'm not going to list matches where Nadal was clearly the better player where Fed had no chance to win, just matches that clearly show mental fragility on an epic scale:
2006 MC: Fed won the first set and was up a break and 40-15 on his serve. Then mentally collapsed and lost in three.
2006 Rome: Blew 2 MP's on his own serve on FH sitters.
2008 Wimbledon: Fifth set, Nadal serving 3-4 at 30-40. Fed has an easy mid court FH and hits it wide.
2009 AO: Worst choke of his career, mentally terrified the entire match, something like 4/24 on BP's.
I could list others as well, but these are the mot noteworthy.
His mental weakness against Novak is less pronounced, but also on blatant display in two successive USO's where he fell apart after holding MP's and didn't win another game. The Wimbledon final of 2014 is cringe worthy, where again he had a BP in the fifth set on an easy FH and hit it wide. The USO 2015 final was a chokefest with 3/23 BP's.
If you digest this and still think it's just a "very poor, lazy, inadequate, terribly unimaginative way" of describing Fed's mental issues, then you obviously didn't watch any of these matches.
How ironic.kevin anderson. his face looks like a meth addicts