Nadalgaenger
G.O.A.T.
I know that this is an old topic, but now that we are 10 years removed from it and can look back with some distance (and perhaps even gain thereby a more objective and less polemical perspective), how do we view the infamous Nadal/Soderling match of the of the 2009 FO?
Two basic interpretations:
1. Soderling was in God-mode and Rafa's NORMAL level wasn't good enough to stay with him.
2. Soderling was surprisingly good but Rafa's level was clearly down (due to injury or psychological distress) and he was proven beatable at the French.
How do you vote and why?
Note: Obviously these two things are not mutually exclusive, and obviously Soderling had to hit a certain level to win, but one factor should outweigh the other.
Two basic interpretations:
1. Soderling was in God-mode and Rafa's NORMAL level wasn't good enough to stay with him.
2. Soderling was surprisingly good but Rafa's level was clearly down (due to injury or psychological distress) and he was proven beatable at the French.
How do you vote and why?
Note: Obviously these two things are not mutually exclusive, and obviously Soderling had to hit a certain level to win, but one factor should outweigh the other.
Last edited: