What frame is flexy/stable/good SW/lowish power/& hits heavy ball/huge serve?!

I've never talked to you before, nor have you and I ever crossed paths. Yet you felt a need to write an essay about me and post it in the same thread TWICE. Now you want my help on rackets? :shock::cry: And when I refuse to help you, you think you're in the right and better than me by attempting to TROLL ME again? You're definitely more of an "adult". Thanks for letting me know that.

BTW, your ignore function isn't working very well for you. :oops:
 
klem,

One thing: I plan on buying a MG Rad or AG 300 specifically for major custom job/turning into experimental Novak-like/slightly easier PT630/frame... could be in the next few days.

Reb still does my head in!! It's a bit of a 'phantom' racket!... I just find it erratic and not consistantly hitting that heavy ball.... however, generally... "serve bomber?... tick!... 2hbh b-line blaster?... tick!... feel?... tick! (kind of)"... hmm...

Playing my Rad Tour TT this morning, weather allowing (we'll see how I last with such a huge SW...)


Fed,

I certainly would LOVE to get my hands on a LM Rad Tour! As I said before, it's 1 of those rods I tried for a while to get, but gave up on eventually. If I'm not mistaken, it's Kal-El's personal fave frame ever??


Alpine & Tennis Man,

Any chance you could take the argument elsewhere?


TnT, Brent, col, goran,

Cheers guys!

R.
 
The lm radical tour is like the giant squid. Reported to be fierce, yet no one has ever seen one up close.
However, after a fortuitous barter, I seem to have happened upon a cache of them. I will report asap.
 
Ross,

I have started playing the Youtek Speed MP 16x19 and love it. I added 6 grams of lead total @ 3 & 9 to improve the stability for volleys. The weight comes out to 12 ounces even, has a flex of 63, and is a serving beast! I have been using this setup for a month now and I believe after a year of trying different sticks I have found the one.

Edman
Just changed my setup a bit and having even more satisfaction! I put 4 grams at 3 & 9 and 1 in the throat. Volleys are still stable, groundstrokes are better, and serves like a beast!
 
up-date:

The most important development of the last few weeks to note is, it's official... mid frames are now off my agenda!... I loved the AG100 and the PB10 mid was growing on me, and others were taking my fancy. However, my instinct, as well as a fair amount of evidence based on my more b-liner game, technique deficiencies, general preferences, etc, has propelled me into the decision... I just need a bit more (and not least in the way of head-size, I suspect.)

A purchase has been made... Because I so much like Rad Tour Twin Tube XL I've been toying with (a great example of a soft buttery feeling, low power, big SW, decent static weight, big hitter!) - I am now presently waiting arrival of 1 standard size Rad Tour Twin Tube...

Still need to restring Reb 95 (I do change my mind a lot about this frame but I feel I 'owe it' another s/job because I really liked it and it was my primary frame for a few months)...

Have decided to hit a bit with my old PT 280/630's to see if I can't handle them a little better/get more from them than was seemingly the case... I just love the quality build, feel, solidness, etc of these Heads!

Hope to get my 'experimental' frame this week (to be modded up a lot) - probably MG Rad MP or AG200/4D200...

Hope to check out legendary RD7 soon (sounds like it might appeal to me)... am lucky to have a contact who will let me let me test/purchase his...

Would like to test a YT Rad Pro but demoing here in the UK isn't the common practice is is in the States, and I'm reluctant to spend the small fortune these frames are going for here... hmmm... must say though, out of all the recent releases, this one probably appeals to me the most.




edman,

The specs of the YT Speed MP don't quite 'do it' for me tbh, though I think I'd appreciate that extra .2 length on the handle!... Q. What's the feel with this? How soft/flexy/buttery or otherwise?



R.
 
I just had a session with the lm rad tour. Extremely solid frame. Feels like a lump of granite in the hand. Thick like a baseball bat on contact. Unlike any radical I've ever tried.
 
I just had a session with the lm rad tour. Extremely solid frame. Feels like a lump of granite in the hand. Thick like a baseball bat on contact. Unlike any radical I've ever tried.

I'm jealous!... would love to get hold of this... pretty scarce now in the UK unfortunately... any instinct on whether you might play with it as primary frame?... is it that good?

R.
 
Tough to say after one hit. It feels heavy, but the power level is really nice. I hit the best backhand of my life at one point. First serves were awesome. It was really easy to chip balls and come in behind them. Only drawback is manueverability. Will have to give it more time.
It does not feel as demanding as a bumblebee yet it has more oomph.
 
^ This is the one racquet that I have always wanted to possess... along with an i.prestige midplus.

I do have some LMRadMid+'s that I have customized very nicely.. but I somehow feel the LMRadTour would be a much better fit, spec-wise.

-----------------------------------

Ross,

I'm in the middle of racquet experiment/research with the kbladeTeam. Check out the stats on this frame..IMO.. it is the perfect foundation for customization.

I have started a thread 'The Super Duper 'Sister' Slayer'.. http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=298101

Will update my experience with customizing/playing this frame by the end of the upcoming weekend.
 
Last edited:
Ok.. So the Liquidmetal Radical Tour... everyone seems to be thinking its something incredible because they can't get hold of it. Well sorry but it is not. I had 6 of them I bought because of all the hype surrounding it a year or so ago. Tinny.. tiny sweetspot.. and just not even in the same league as the rad tour twintube zebra or 98.

The TT have a much better feel, swing better and have a much better seetspot.

Ross... string up that REB 95... I am seriously considering changing my bumblebees for them. LOW tension on Poly is just great with them..
 
Ross - coming to this thread a little late, but just my two cents worth as a 630 user. I was very disappointed with the MG Rad. Granted - it wasn't mine to mod, but it did have a fair amount of lead at 9 and 3 and in the butt (sorry - no idea how much), a leather grip and was strung with Rip Control 16 at 57. I didn't care for it at all. It felt like a more flimsy version of the PT that had, well, been weighted. The extra weight really didn't make it feel any closer to the PT though.

I know many on these boards love to mod, believe it is necessary in many cases, and I've done my share too, but I've rarely found anything other than an 'overdressed' feeling after tampering with a frame. I have yet to mod a racquet and have it feel more 'plush' or solid - just 'different'. Obviously for me, modding isn't the way to go -and I would never try and persuade anyone to not mod - but see if you can borrow a MG Rad before you pay for one. I have a hard time thinking that that particular frame - in any form - would satisfy a Pro Tour user.

best

g
 
But if you can find an RD7 - if you can handle it, you should love it! Swings heavier than the PT though.

Or (here's a freaky idea but one worth considering) - find yourself an RD Pro 70 long, cut an inch off, counterbalance it and off you go! The frame itself is a beauty, more spin than anything I've ever seen (RD7 and POG included), beautiful plush feel, great plow - 17mm beam - it's Martina N did. If it's good enough for her......?
 
klem,

Good to see a few more of us are getting into this major experimenting with customizing up lighter frames. Shall follow your thread as it develops.


onky,

Looking forward to my Rad Tour TT standard size arriving and seeing how it compares to the XL version. I suspect that if - and it's a big-ish if - but if I can serve well with it, this will be a real contender (we'll leave aside issues re availability for now.) The feel of my XL is absolutely what I'm into right now... buttery lush and soft! Quite how the standard size measures up to the booming groundies of the XL remains to be seen, but if I can get a bit more out of it than I can with the PT 280/630, and it's maneuverable enough, yep, for sure, a real contender in the making...

Re the Reb, I'm thinking soft poly @ 50 lbs (maybe with lead @ 12)... what do you reckon?... all I want is more power really... of the more recent releases, purely because of my recent association with it, the Reb would probably be my favourite... it ticks loads of boxes for me.


ryan,

TBH, I'm not really looking at Wilsons.


OHBH,

Good shout with the Donnay. Specs a bit out, as you say, but worth noting absolutely. Not familiar with the brand but... hmm... interesting...


galain,

Right. Yes. Lots there for me to consider with your MG Rad assessment g... oh and I like this: "It felt like a more flimsy version of the PT that had, well, been weighted".

Yes, can't wait to hit with this legendary frame (RD7)... ticks a lot of the boxes stats-wise... that said, I've no real idea if this will be for me... just have wait and see.

Q re this frame I confess I've never heard of ever before (but like the sound of)... Does the RD Pro 70 longbody have to be cut down in the 1st place? What's so bad about its performance with the added length?


R.
 
The most important development of the last few weeks to note is, it's official... mid frames are now off my agenda!... I loved the AG100 and the PB10 mid was growing on me, and others were taking my fancy. However, my instinct, as well as a fair amount of evidence based on my more b-liner game, technique deficiencies, general preferences, etc, has propelled me into the decision... I just need a bit more (and not least in the way of head-size, I suspect.)

A purchase has been made... Because I so much like Rad Tour Twin Tube XL I've been toying with (a great example of a soft buttery feeling, low power, big SW, decent static weight, big hitter!) - I am now presently waiting arrival of 1 standard size Rad Tour Twin Tube...

Still need to restring Reb 95 (I do change my mind a lot about this frame but I feel I 'owe it' another s/job because I really liked it and it was my primary frame for a few months)...

Have decided to hit a bit with my old PT 280/630's to see if I can't handle them a little better/get more from them than was seemingly the case... I just love the quality build, feel, solidness, etc of these Heads!

Hope to get my 'experimental' frame this week (to be modded up a lot) - probably MG Rad MP or AG200/4D200...

Hope to check out legendary RD7 soon (sounds like it might appeal to me)... am lucky to have a contact who will let me let me test/purchase his...

Would like to test a YT Rad Pro but demoing here in the UK isn't the common practice is is in the States, and I'm reluctant to spend the small fortune these frames are going for here... hmmm... must say though, out of all the recent releases, this one probably appeals to me the most.




edman,

The specs of the YT Speed MP don't quite 'do it' for me tbh, though I think I'd appreciate that extra .2 length on the handle!... Q. What's the feel with this? How soft/flexy/buttery or otherwise?



R.
This frame is soft but not too soft. I would compare it to the Prince Diablo Tour MP but with more power. Touch is great around the net and like I said before, serving is a dream. The lead I added at 3 & 9 and in the throat make this the ideal racquet.
 
Popped an lm rad tour on a scale today...13.0 oz! (Leather, og, damper, 17g poly)
Heavy duty!
Really enjoying it though. Gonna take it out in matchplay and see how fast I start to fade...
Last two days of hitting have been fun, was surprised to find it was so heavy. Reminds me of kps88, might turn out to be a racquet I love hitting with but will be too brutish for a grinding match. First serves are bombs!
 
Fed, everyone

Whilst I await delivery of the standard size Rad Tour TT, I've been hitting with its far heftier brother the XL version...

I don't dont know about you/LM Rad Tour, but one thing I'm loving is that plush feel/lowish stiffness/big SW/12+oz static weight combination! It's obviously a different method/take on a big hitting frame - and one that I endorse.

The drawbacks in this case do exist however... it is undoubtedly too bulky for me to use in regular, more competitive settings. It can feel pretty 'alien' in and around the net. The string definitely needs cutting out and replacing... reckon the last time the frame had a new string job Aggassi must have had hair! :) Anyhow, I certainly feel like I'm developing my 'tennis muscles', and I actually think it's a good form of 'training' of a sort... provided my arm doesn't fall off! :shock:

On to other stuff... my interest in the Rad Pro is increasing, I must say. It might come down to me having to take a chance and just biting the bullet and splashing the cash!... might get a AG200 for very little in the next day or 2 - then I can try and mod it up (though tbh some of ppls reports on the so-so success of such 'experiments' has slightly dampened my enthusiasm)... need to resting the Reb, perhaps the PT630... test the RD7... and that's kind of it.

R.
 
Everyone,

Okay guys. Here's this morning's Big Question!... and it's quite an important one to me, for reasons I'll explain later...

Anyhow... keeping in mind this is what we're talking about...

93 - 98" head-size... soft/flexy... solid/stable... decent SW... decent static weight... low/medium power... heavy ball, booming g-strokes... massive serve...

In ppl's opinions, how does that ^ square up with the N95 6.1?

Very curious to hear some opininions.

Cheers!

R.
 
I think that a number of six-one users have commented that the nCode model is a bit more soft, muted, etc. than the K generation. I tried it once or twice and it was familiar enough - I was still into the 6.1 Classics at the time - but I didn't come away with an impression that it was especially soft and flexy. More middle of the road - it also wasn't painfully rigid for me either.

I'm actually jealous that you're maybe going to get hold of an older Yonex RD-7. Never used any of the old legends from Yonex, but they sound fantastic.
 
i would say that you would be hard pressed to find a racket like this, straight off the shelf. instead, i would reccommend that you get something that meets all of the requirements, minus the booming serve and heavy ball. once you find this racket, i woul suggest adding lead, until you find a weight that you are both comfortable with, and can get power from. i would suggest any prestige mid, or if you want plenty of spin, maybe the mg prestige pro.
 
Everyone,

Okay guys. Here's this morning's Big Question!... and it's quite an important one to me, for reasons I'll explain later...

Anyhow... keeping in mind this is what we're talking about...

93 - 98" head-size... soft/flexy... solid/stable... decent SW... decent static weight... low/medium power... heavy ball, booming g-strokes... massive serve...

In ppl's opinions, how does that ^ square up with the N95 6.1?

Very curious to hear some opininions.

Cheers!

R.

Very interesting that you mention this one Ross. I was just about to comment about it. I just got my n6.1 95 18x20 and I am loving it. As soon as I break the strings that are in it I will be restringing with SPPPP at my usual tension to really test it out but so far it is much nicer than the k6.1. Check the post in my thread for a little more detail.
 
I forgot a couple things...

I string my C10 Pros with 17 ga. syn. gut at maybe 62-64 lbs. Nothing remarkable, but I've only enjoyed multi's in frames that were even softer than these Volkls and I've only tried a poly hybrid maybe once. Even in a rather flexible racquet, it was too hard and lifeless for me.

The thing for me with the thinner syn. gut is that I get a combo of crispness and softness that I don't really find with thicker synthetics, etc. In many of my frames, this string is easiest to dial in, it performs fine for me, and it's cheap to replace, especially since I string my own bats. I don't think that it will unlock any major power for you, but it's what I've been using. I also have just a little 3/9 o'clock lead on one of my C10's for just a touch of extra stability and I like it - I'll probably do the same to my other one, too.

I forgot to ask earlier - I don't remember if you've had one or two racquets that were among your personal stand-outs for serving. If your 6.1 Classic ranked up there, it may actually be the case that you don't want to go extremely soft with the flex ratings as long as you have a frame that isn't a rocket launcher, right? A little backbone will give your serves some pop, but if you also have a little flex, the ground strokes should behave to some degree, too.

Last gasp (Blah-Blah-Blah...) If you've never sampled a Yonex mid, you may consider getting around to it at some point. I've tried a few of their frames from as large as the RDS 002 Tour on down to the MP Tour-1 mids. Seems to me that the Isometric (squarish) head shape that they like to use makes their mids play more like something larger than a traditional mid. That 98 sq. inch 002 Tour actually felt borderline oversized for me. Knowledge is power, or so I'm told...
 
My hunch is that you have reached the pinnacle of your quest with recent purchase of tt rad 630 tour along with some sticks you already have (pt630 and c10). N6.1 is an awesome racquet, soft for a prostaff 6.1 with good power, but not quite the baseline bludgeon of old heavy radicals.
Btw, I think hurricane 18 is a great string for 18x20 head mps
 
The N95 18x20 is one of my all time fav sticks, with a stiffness of 64, it isn't that soft a stick but what makes this stick special is the the whole is more than the sum of it's parts.

It has all the right stuff for me, balance, heft, stability, comfort n just the right amount of power.

mawashi
 
fuzz, mawashi, Fed, Everyone,

Yeah I thought I'd ask the qsn about the N95 because before this thread and before I decided that softish feel, fairly big SW, low-med stifness, etc was the direction to explore, the N95 had actually began to replace the Reb as my no. 1 frame.

However, to me it doesn't quite fit the criteria here - especially re feel, stiffness is a tad more advanced than I'd prefer, plus maybe balance, weighting, isn't quite as b-liner orientated as, say, the PT 280/630, etc. For sure though, if my criteria changes and when/if I'm through with this particular 'search', the N95 could be right up there again.

As Fed says:
N6.1 is an awesome racquet, soft for a prostaff 6.1 with good power, but not quite the baseline bludgeon of old heavy radicals.
... but as mawashi also says:
it isn't that soft a stick... but what makes this stick special is the the whole is more than the sum of it's parts. It has all the right stuff for me, balance, heft, stability, comfort n just the right amount of power.
... if only the feel was softer and more along the lush butteriness of the Rad Tour Twin Tube, PT 630, etc!

R.

BTW, fuzz, I concur with your own impressions of the N95, though I guess I liked it a lot better than yourself... re the C10 pro, I've had 2 different periods when I've put some time in with it and tried to see if it might be 'the one'. For me I struggle to serve well with it and it doesn't quite have the 'body' I like; that beefed up, bullying muscle that I get from frames such as the pt 630, the Reb, the Rad Tour Twin Tube, the PSC 6.1, the N95, etc. That said though, I think it's a unique and amazing racquet. It has a way of swinging - clicking through the gears - that's fantastic (I suppose it's the weighting + balance + quality build) and means you can really tee up on your shots and lash out. Then hit that lunatic spin that will keep the ball in 9 times out of 10! And it has that soft feel too for sure. I can its attraction...
 
Yeah I thought I'd ask the qsn about the N95 because before this thread and before I decided that softish feel, fairly big SW, low-med stifness, etc was the direction to explore, the N95 had actually began to replace the Reb as my no. 1 frame.

Hi Ross, may I ask which string pattern do you have on the N6.1 95? From what I've read it seems that the 18x20 pattern is more popular among users, but the 16x18 pattern was sold more.

I'm also on a similar quest like you, although I have not tested that many rackets like you, and I really need to settle on one frame. I bought a Volkl C10 Pro a couple of weeks ago and I really like it so far. I've also just bought a used Wilson N6.1 95 (18x20) to see how they compare. I'm starting to like hefty frames.
 
riau,

I've played a fair amount with the closed pattern at the the beginning of '09... I instantly loved the stability and solidity, controlled booming b-line performance, found it to be a lot better than the closed pattern in and around the net, and it also serves pretty big too. Over the summer though, when I began having some misgivings with the Reb, which I had moved on to, I looked again at the open pattern N95 and was won over by the added serve oomph/spin, ground-stroke power and spring.

it was like the open pattern was suddenly showing me it had a bit of 'x-factor' about it, if you know what i mean? Plenty of ppl don't like that springy power boost and find they have too much power or trajectory or pop or whatever, but I found it gave it something additional, unpredictable and exciting... imo.


Everyone,

Another definite decision has now been made: "au revoir forever PT 630"!:(

I love the frame, but I play a bit better with the Reb 95 (my 2hbh and serve were thanking me this morning when I switched frames after the 1st set.) I really need to accept that as much as revere ol' blue, it's just a tad too demanding for me. Finito.

Slowly but surely progress is being made!

R.

BTW, I'd love hear more from other re Reb 95 VS YT Rad Pro.
 
Another definite decision has now been made: "au revoir forever PT 630"!:(

I love the frame, but I play a bit better with the Reb 95

Ross, that's always a tough decision and one I had to make recently with the PSL-gt. I loved the feel but I just played better with other sticks-the PSL was just too demanding for me on a stroke by stroke basis.

I do prefer an open pattern. I use a lot of spin anyway so the extra bit of pop is usually welcome.
 
I've played a fair amount with the closed pattern at the the beginning of '09... I instantly loved the stability and solidity, controlled booming b-line performance, found it to be a lot better than the closed pattern in and around the net, and it also serves pretty big too. Over the summer though, when I began having some misgivings with the Reb, which I had moved on to, I looked again at the open pattern N95 and was won over by the added serve oomph/spin, ground-stroke power and spring.

The second "closed" should probably be "open"?
And why did you move from the closed pattern N6.1 95 to the Rebel?
 
I've only play for a very short time with both sticks but didn't click with either.

Rebel 95, rather sluggish n call me old fashioned but those ports just look wrong on a tennis racquet. Other than that, it feels very nice, like a heavier n more stable Vantage 95.

The utek rad pro feels a bit too powerful n with the 16x19 patten on a 100sq in frame, it doesn't have the accuracy I want. That n the awful balance just put me off.

mawashi
 
The balance is not awful at all. I disgaree with everything you said. It is also real easy to control coming from the apdc. I would demo the Rad Pro Ross if you have not already done so.
 
PED,

Because I consider the PT630 to be... ahem... The Template, The King of Frames, The Racquet From Which All Other Racquets Must Be Judged, etc, I agree all right that it's hard to admit defeat when you really have an attachment to a certain frame. :roll:

I usually prefer open patterns.


riau,

Yeah, my bad - 2nd 'closed' should indeed be 'open'.

I went from the 18x20 N95 to the Reb 95 because whilst the N95 offered a heck of a lot for me, the Reb just wowed me and seemed to offer even more (see description below).


mawashi, Power Player,

Re the Rad Pro, well, I obviously need to play it for myself to see which of you I happen to agree with!

Re the Rebel, it definitely 'clicked' with me at the start... easy to hit a heavy ball whilst at the same time providing loads of control, stand out great for a booming 2hbh, big serves/lots of action, nicely hefty and stable, the spin of an open pattern in a closed pattern, rich feel, excellent from both b-line and for more all court, and I could go on... :cool:


Everyone,

So then we've lost the PT 280/630... we've lost the AG100 and PB10 mid and other mids that threatened to snare my wondering eye!...

The Rad Tour Twin Tube XL has proved to be a perfect example of the feel I like, but it isn't a realistic choice due to its extreme heft (369 SW anybody?!), and therefore I've actually bought and am awaiting the imminent arrival of the standard size Rad Tour Twin Tube - I hope that I can get a bit more from it (specially on serve and 2hbh) than is the case with its 'cousin' the PT 280/630...

I did plan on cusomising a MG Rad and/or an AG300, and I may still (though my enthusiasm has slightly dampened lately re this notion tbh)...

The Reb is definitely rising again in my estimation (I played a bit with it today and it was just like the 1st few hits I ever had with it... very satisfying... plus I've put lead @ 12 and that seems to help I think...)...

The Rad Pro is a frame I'm trying to procure right now...

I hope to check out the RD7 shortly...

And there we just about have it! Hopefully by Christmas/New Year this will all be over and there will be just one frame...


R.
 
Ross, have you tried the LM Rad Tour MP?

mawashi

As discussed earlier in this thread - No. Would love to check it out as it so sounds 'my kind of frame', but unfortunately it's not so readily available. (I know because I was very interested in this frame a few years back and tried to get one. The search proved futile however.) BTW, Fed has just got 1 and has made a few comments about it earlier ^...



Everyone,

Hmm... still reflecting on how much I liked the Reb again yesterday... :cool:

I loved the particular heft and I'd even call it 'clubbiness' (obviously not in the negative sense)... what I mean is the Reb puts a lot of 'body' behind the shot... it's a particular type of stability that I'm really into...

And, as I said, groundies, both bh and fh (2hbh) stands out as does serve... I was just instantly finding deep, in your face, heavy boomers on the former, and on the latter, there was just a lot of oomph and decent spin.

Cons to this racquet? Well, I've never thought it to be the most maneuverable ever... balance is very head-light (interesting I preferred it yesterday with lead tape @ 12)... tbh I also don't think the feel is amazing (not up with some of those mids for I was scrutinizing lately for example)... but as for the big one: feel... okay, it isn't in the league of Rad Tour TT or PT 630 (better though than the N95, which we've talked about recently), but I reckon it isn't so very far off... basically it sometimes feels lush and flexy, other times it can indeed feel a bit stiffer and and/or uneven... there is however a caveat of sorts - namely it's strung with BB Alu Rough (M), Gosen OG Micro (C) @ 55/57... in other words, I haven't looked at softer string options/set ups... yet.

R.
 
The LM Rad Tour MP is basically a LM Rad MP all modded up with lead n silicon. If you got the skills, the LM Rad MP is just $70.

mawashi
 
The LM Rad Tour MP is basically a LM Rad MP all modded up with lead n silicon. If you got the skills, the LM Rad MP is just $70.

mawashi

Got 1 already... not a fan... tinny and cheap compared to older Heads like i. Prestige, PT 630, Rad Tours, etc... just my opinion... but that also links in with why I'm having 2nd thoughts about modding up a MG Rad for example (though I still might.)



Everyone,

BTW, please note error corrected now from 'feel' to 'touch' (in red):

Cons to this racquet? Well, I've never thought it to be the most maneuverable ever... balance is very head-light (interesting I preferred it yesterday with lead tape @ 12)... tbh I also don't think the touch is amazing (not up with some of those mids for I was scrutinizing lately for example)... but as for the big one: feel... okay, it isn't in the league of Rad Tour TT or PT 630 (better though than the N95, which we've talked about recently), but I reckon it isn't so very far off... basically it sometimes feels lush and flexy, other times it can indeed feel a bit stiffer and and/or uneven... there is however a caveat of sorts - namely it's strung with BB Alu Rough (M), Gosen OG Micro (C) @ 55/57... in other words, I haven't looked at softer string options/set ups... yet.

R.
 
Hey Ross, since our conversations and similar searches i've been reading your posts on this one quite closely.
I just recently parted with about 6 twin tube satellite tours, i really liked the general feel of the frame but i found it was the shape of the grip that distracted me to the point were i was always looking at the racket position i've never had to do that with any other brand.I found the massive sw on the XL ones a bit much too esp at the net.
As you seem to be able to hunt down some rare ish frames, see if you can try a first generation soft drive.
Good luck with your tests!
 
Ross is probably having a migraine to mourn over all the recommendations. I have a collection of rackets that I rotate them frequently. My feeling about each of them changes every time. One day I may think it is great, but another day it is a different story.
 
Ross is probably having a migraine to mourn over all the recommendations. I have a collection of rackets that I rotate them frequently. My feeling about each of them changes every time. One day I may think it is great, but another day it is a different story.

LOL!...

No... as a 'racketaholic' I find it all interesting and am grateful for ppls contributions and insights. Moreover, I feel that the sort of frame, roughly speaking, I'm interested in, is also the kind of frame plenty of others are curious about (hence maybe 1 reason this thread hasn't faded away yet)... I think some ppl would love to be able to hit big (like with a Bab) and yet have a feel of lush smoothness (like with Rad Tour Twin Tube, PT630, older Fischers, etc.)

Although being a self-professed racketaholic though, I would like to (ahem) reform my ways and just focus on 1 frame for a long period like everyone else... (Or am I doomed to wonder through the underworld like a vampire, never to be at peace and forever bathed in darkness and bedeviled by the unquenchable desire for fresh racquets?!... :shock::) )

R.
 
I would like to (ahem) reform my ways and just focus on 1 frame for a long period like everyone else...

R.

Good luck. I have been trying to stick with one or two for a while. There are no many distractions or selections .. it's hard to resist the temptations.
 
Ross for what its worth, I havent picked up my yt radical in a week and a half bc I am slowly becoming addicted to my lm rad tour. There are three instances where it is clearly superior: return of serve, especially low nasty chips, flat fh up the line (weight makes it much easier to change direction on the ball, and flat first serves. I played dubs and got into a nice rythmn of softening up my opponent with spin out wide and then every so often bodying them up with a hard one. Really nice racquet.
 
Got 1 already... not a fan... tinny and cheap compared to older Heads like i. Prestige, PT 630, Rad Tours, etc... just my opinion... but that also links in with why I'm having 2nd thoughts about modding up a MG Rad for example (though I still might.)

You got the LM Rad MP not the tour that's why it feels like crap. Mod it up to a tour n you'll see the difference.

Otherwise all you got is a piece of dead weight on you that you'll never use.

mawashi
 
mawashi,

Otherwise all you got is a piece of dead weight on you that you'll never use.

How true! :)


Fed,

Sounds great!... I keep saying it - and I'll say it again: "I'm jealous!" :evil: ...

Q: are you starting to play like Novak Djokovic yet?! (I've long imagined his real frame to be a little like the LM Rad Tour?) :lol:

Fed, tell me though, you don't happen to have the specs for the LM Rad Tour? I would love to know them.


Everyone,

I don't suppose any of you have any time on/views re the RD7 long?... just wondering as the standard size is hefty enough as it is, if that means the longbody is just going to be too much to wield altogether?

Thanks,

R.
 
lm rad tour

while I was lurking, I was going to suggest the LM Rad Tour for your description, Ross. This is my main stick and it is everything you are looking for in a racquet, for me anyway, your mileage (or kilometerage ;) ) may vary.

I agree with Fed that return of serve is probably one of the best things about this racquet. I love crushing forehands on return of serve on flat hard 1st serves. You just put a nice smooth stroke on it and it blasts away, but lots of heavier sticks will do this. But all groundies are just a blast with this racquet, great control and good pop due to the weight. Onky is right, though, the sweetspot is smallish and not very forgiving, the weight doesn't help in this regard. My first serves are pretty big with this racquet and there's a good amount of spin from this stick (not as much as APDC, but not too shabby). My favorite aspect is the flex (61 RA).

I came to this racquet because I kept getting injured using K90/K95/leaded up APDC on late shots or late backhand volleys. I really liked those 3 racquets the most out of all the ones I've tried and the LM Rad Tour has some of the best features of them all. It wasn't until I tried flexier sticks (PT630/PST/PSL/BB11) that I realized I should be using very flexy frames for my arm safety.

For instance, for me:
- The K90 excelled at return of serve, first serve, and volleys (in that order). The LM Rad Tour had these aspects for me (except volleying).
- The K95/APDC excelled at heavy, offensive groundies with excellent spin. The LM Rad Tour had these aspects for me (less spin, however).
- The PT630/PST/PSL/BB11 that I tried had some sweet arm-friendly flex and feel that I really enjoyed. The LM Rad Tour had these aspects for me.

I used the K95 for a very long time, which is 12.3 oz but very stiff (70 RA). I switched to an APDC which I polarized and leaded up to 12.3 oz, that one eventually had way too much pop on my 2h backhand, which is flatter. I wanted something more like the K95 but arm friendly, so I pulled out my old LM Rad Tour. My LM Rad Tours STOCK are 12.3 oz, 61 flex, SW in the 333 range, and 6pt HL. I put leather grip and overgrip on mine, so mine is a bit heavier and more HL. I was actually looking at the Rebel 95 as something that seems similar out in the market today and was actually looking to demo it.

Even though I really enjoy the LM Rad Tour, I like to try different things, so I may be using the Youtek Radical Pro or Rebel 95 next. For now, I'm also trying ultra low tension after playing my friend's POG MP strung at 45 (it was great). The PST, Mcomp95, and BB Delta Core Legend (wannabe Head PT630/PT280 clone, imho) also looks to have very similar specs, the mcomp95 having a more open pattern.

Anyway, between the Rebel95 and RadPro, you may have sticks better than the LM Rad Tour, so I wouldn't sweat missing out on this stick. There are a ton of sticks out there that hit very close to it, I just happen to have a bunch of them.
 
while I was lurking, I was going to suggest the LM Rad Tour for your description, Ross. This is my main stick and it is everything you are looking for in a racquet, for me anyway, your mileage (or kilometerage ;) ) may vary.

I agree with Fed that return of serve is probably one of the best things about this racquet. I love crushing forehands on return of serve on flat hard 1st serves. You just put a nice smooth stroke on it and it blasts away, but lots of heavier sticks will do this. But all groundies are just a blast with this racquet, great control and good pop due to the weight. Onky is right, though, the sweetspot is smallish and not very forgiving, the weight doesn't help in this regard. My first serves are pretty big with this racquet and there's a good amount of spin from this stick (not as much as APDC, but not too shabby). My favorite aspect is the flex (61 RA).

I came to this racquet because I kept getting injured using K90/K95/leaded up APDC on late shots or late backhand volleys. I really liked those 3 racquets the most out of all the ones I've tried and the LM Rad Tour has some of the best features of them all. It wasn't until I tried flexier sticks (PT630/PST/PSL/BB11) that I realized I should be using very flexy frames for my arm safety.

For instance, for me:
- The K90 excelled at return of serve, first serve, and volleys (in that order). The LM Rad Tour had these aspects for me (except volleying).
- The K95/APDC excelled at heavy, offensive groundies with excellent spin. The LM Rad Tour had these aspects for me (less spin, however).
- The PT630/PST/PSL/BB11 that I tried had some sweet arm-friendly flex and feel that I really enjoyed. The LM Rad Tour had these aspects for me.

I used the K95 for a very long time, which is 12.3 oz but very stiff (70 RA). I switched to an APDC which I polarized and leaded up to 12.3 oz, that one eventually had way too much pop on my 2h backhand, which is flatter. I wanted something more like the K95 but arm friendly, so I pulled out my old LM Rad Tour. My LM Rad Tours STOCK are 12.3 oz, 61 flex, SW in the 333 range, and 6pt HL. I put leather grip and overgrip on mine, so mine is a bit heavier and more HL. I was actually looking at the Rebel 95 as something that seems similar out in the market today and was actually looking to demo it.

Even though I really enjoy the LM Rad Tour, I like to try different things, so I may be using the Youtek Radical Pro or Rebel 95 next. For now, I'm also trying ultra low tension after playing my friend's POG MP strung at 45 (it was great). The PST, Mcomp95, and BB Delta Core Legend (wannabe Head PT630/PT280 clone, imho) also looks to have very similar specs, the mcomp95 having a more open pattern.

Anyway, between the Rebel95 and RadPro, you may have sticks better than the LM Rad Tour, so I wouldn't sweat missing out on this stick. There are a ton of sticks out there that hit very close to it, I just happen to have a bunch of them.

Nice post cheers. Shall reply to it later in depth... gotta run!

R.
 
(I've long imagined his real frame to be a little like the LM Rad Tour?) :lol:

Fed, tell me though, you don't happen to have the specs for the LM Rad Tour? I would love to know them.

First I believe Novak is currently using an old mp radical Tour yellow (trisys version).

Specs:

Head Sizes: 97 sq. in. 626 sq. cm.
Length: 27 inches / 69 cm
Construction:20 mm Constant Beam
Composition:High Twaron and Graphite
Strung Weight:12 ounces / 340 grams
Power Level: Low
Babolat Racquet Diagnostic
Center (RDC) Data:
Stiffness: 58 (0-100)
Inertia: 327 (200-400)
Manueverability: A, 73 (0-100)
Stroke Style: Long, Full
Swing Speed: Fast
Balance: 6pts Head Light
Racquet Color:
Black, Blue, w/ Red Lettering
Grip Type:
Cushion Grip
String Tension:
50-60 pounds
String Pattern:
18 Mains / 20 Crosses

LM Rad Tour MP

Head Size:
98 sq. in. / 632 sq. cm.
Length: 27 inches / 69 cm
Strung Weight: 12.3oz / 349g
Balance: 6pts Head Light
Swingweight: 332
Stiffness: 63
Beam Width: 21 mm Straight Beam
Composition: LiquidMetal Titanium / Graphite and Piezzo Electric Fibers
Power Level: Low
Swing Speed: Fast
Grip Type: HydroControl
String Pattern:
18 Mains / 20 Crosses

mawashi
 
Last edited:
cheers,

Some frames there def worth thinking about at least... the Reb I really like obviously and the Rad Pro I'm hoping to get very soon... if the M Comp 95 has the kind of Fischer feel associated with the older ceramic era and just after, I'm sure that aspect will be excellent; I had heard though it was a bit of a weak serve rod (and that's how I found such frames as the old Pro No 1's before)...BB DCL I've hearg good things about (though not the stuff re it being similar to the PT630... hmm...)... and the LM Rad Tour appeals but who knows when I might see 1 of those in my bag (it's taken me 4 years to get a standard size Rad Tour Twin Tube!)

BTW, thanks to you and mawashi for specs on LM Rad Tour and Trysis 260.

R.
 
Ross....meant to write a post before I went out of town but here is some more input re the N95.

As per mawashi, the N95 adds up to more than its specs. It produces some awesome groundies...heavy, plenty of spin. I've found myself being rather happy because in stock form, I am getting really good results. Goundies are definitely my favorite part of this stick. I can whip the forehand when I want to and the backhand really drives.

It's plenty maneuverable at net and I could get pretty good results on touch shots and quick putaway volleys. The downside is that it felt a little boardy to me at lower speeds which led me to not want to approach and play at net as much. I suspect that string setup could change that though.

Serves were awesome with this stick. There was plenty of pop from the frame and I think that I benefited from the lesser weight than that of my previous stick. I was swinging more freely and smoothly which produced massively better serves for me.

Overall, it really is a great stick. My only complaint with it is that it doesn't have the softer feel that I am really looking for. It's like it's saying "I do all these things great but I can only be stiff and unyielding."

I'm headed out today for a hitting session with the Reb and the N95 side by side and as I mentioned previously, it will probably be the end for N95.
 
Back
Top