What is the percentage probability of Djokovic winning 4 slams in row?

What is the percentage probability of Djokovic winning 4 slams in row?

  • 0%

    Votes: 27 19.4%
  • 10%

    Votes: 27 19.4%
  • 20%

    Votes: 26 18.7%
  • 30%

    Votes: 6 4.3%
  • 40%

    Votes: 9 6.5%
  • 50%

    Votes: 9 6.5%
  • 60%

    Votes: 8 5.8%
  • 70%

    Votes: 9 6.5%
  • 80%

    Votes: 4 2.9%
  • 90%-100%

    Votes: 14 10.1%

  • Total voters
    139

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
Novak is as close to perfection as any player can get, he can defeat all of the greats on their best surfaces, not like pretend perfect Federer.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Forgot, Federer couldn't make it. Not like his best surface is grass anyways, Nadal proved that.

Federer couldn't make once as opposed to the four times Djokovic didn't make it. So Federer lost to Nadal on grass once and it's not his best surface anymore? Is Soderling a better clay courter than Nadal?
 
D

Deleted member 21996

Guest
Federer couldn't make once as opposed to the four times Djokovic didn't make it. So Federer lost to Nadal on grass once and it's not his best surface anymore? Is Soderling a better clay courter than Nadal?

OMG. talking sense into Hatefedvile...

How to deal with Jacksondrokvile lesson one:

try posting about World finance, Yorkshire puddings or Special Olimpics and see Jacksondorkvile twist it into some "omg ****s this, delusional ****s that dso dense... feders is done, dusted and worthless"
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
OMG. talking sense into Hatefedvile...

How to deal with Jacksondrokvile lesson one:

try posting about World finance, Yorkshire puddings or Special Olimpics and see Jacksondorkvile twist it into some "omg ****s this, delusional ****s that dso dense... feders is done, dusted and worthless"

Hahahahaha in fact, I don't think you even have to go that far. I think you could really say anything, whether it makes sense or not, just throw Federer's name in there and you'll get a troll post or a GIF.
 

kragster

Hall of Fame
Ok back on topic,

All geckos, excluding the Eublepharidae family, have no eyelids and instead have a transparent membrane which they lick to clean. Many species will, in defense, expel a foul-smelling material and feces onto their aggressors. There are also many species that will drop their tails in defense, a process called autotomy. These antics are well-known to people who live in warm regions of the world, where several species of geckos make their home inside human habitations.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
It's an interesting question, considering these 2 facts:
a) Nadal has only lost 1 match at Roland Garros.
b) Djokovic has never beaten Federer at Roland Garros.

Now consider these:
a) Nadal has lost to Djokovic 7 times in a row including 2 on clay in straight sets.
b) Federer, the only player who has a shot at Djokovic in slams at the moment, will be almost 31 years old at the 2012 FO
 

devila

Banned
2012 is not 2007, when only nadal played well.

federer doesn't own slams. besides that, he is not the only threat to djoker.
just because federer played 2 error-filled matches by Weak djoker doesn't mean federer was the only fighter worth mentioning in slams vs. djoker.
djoker wasn't comfortable with the media and crowd at the french open and had an injury in september
AND october.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
2012 is not 2007, when only nadal played well.

federer doesn't own slams. besides that, he is not the only threat to djoker.
just because federer played 2 error-filled matches by Weak djoker doesn't mean federer was the only fighter worth mentioning in slams vs. djoker.
djoker wasn't comfortable with the media and crowd at the french open and had an injury in september
AND october.

chilled story bro
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
2012 is not 2007, when only nadal played well.

federer doesn't own slams. besides that, he is not the only threat to djoker.
just because federer played 2 error-filled matches by Weak djoker doesn't mean federer was the only fighter worth mentioning in slams vs. djoker.
djoker wasn't comfortable with the media and crowd at the french open and had an injury in september
AND october.

Alright, so I think we can all come to the unanimous conclusion that this guy doesn't even watch tennis.
 

ledwix

Hall of Fame
If Djokovic and Nadal meet in the Roland Garros final, the tournament should immediately reduce the format to best of 3 sets to save the crowd from skin cancer, ergonomic cramps, dying from old age, etc.
 

devila

Banned
it would've been nice to see nalbandian and del potro in the finals of 2006 and 2009 french open. too bad they were scared of winning.
 

Towser83

G.O.A.T.
Alright, so I think we can all come to the unanimous conclusion that this guy doesn't even watch tennis.

Devila just posts random stuff that makes no sense. He's going on about 2 matches where Djokovic played bad (he lost only one to Federer so wtf?) then him not being comfortable with press, then injuries that were later in the year and had nothing to do with RG. He's best totally ignored. In fact after a few times respoding to him i stopped and noticed most of the time he posts something and no-one even looks up. Totally ignored. It makes me laugh.
 

devila

Banned
Devila just posts random stuff that makes no sense. He's going on about 2 matches where Djokovic played bad (he lost only one to Federer so wtf?) then him not being comfortable with press, then injuries that were later in the year and had nothing to do with RG. He's best totally ignored. In fact after a few times respoding to him i stopped and noticed most of the time he posts something and no-one even looks up. Totally ignored. It makes me laugh.

thanks for ignoring me. is that a djokovic avatar or are you happy to see me?
 

5555

Hall of Fame
"Ignorance is the mother of hapiness"
Ignorance is, for exampe, when you accuse someone of something without proof. You accused me of ignorance regarding our discussion what is the definition of "Grand Slam" without producing a proof.
 
Last edited:

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
Do either Djokovic or Nadal have 6 Wimbledon titles?

And what does that have anything to do with Novak being a more perfect player than Federer and being able to defeat both Nadal and Federer in the same tournament all in a row?

Novak is far more likely than Federer to complete the True Grand Slam, no reason to get butt hurt over it.

Now if Federer was still playing against Safin, Hewitt, and Roddick he would have been able to accomplish it at some point. It was much easier then.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
And what does that have anything to do with Novak being a more perfect player than Federer and being able to defeat both Nadal and Federer in the same tournament all in a row?

Novak is far more likely than Federer to complete the True Grand Slam, no reason to get butt hurt over it.

Now if Federer was still playing against Safin, Hewitt, and Roddick he would have been able to accomplish it at some point. It was much easier then.

It would seem that you've lost track of what we were discussing. No surprise, however. You said that Nadal proved that grass no longer suited Federer. Explain that statement.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
And what does that have anything to do with Novak being a more perfect player than Federer and being able to defeat both Nadal and Federer in the same tournament all in a row?

Novak is far more likely than Federer to complete the True Grand Slam, no reason to get butt hurt over it.

Now if Federer was still playing against Safin, Hewitt, and Roddick he would have been able to accomplish it at some point. It was much easier then.

You also said that Novak had beaten all the greats on their preferred surface. Again, when did Djokovic beat Federer on grass?
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
It would seem that you've lost track of what we were discussing. No surprise, however. You said that Nadal proved that grass no longer suited Federer. Explain that statement.

Never said that, I said that grass was not Federer's best surface which it never was even after they slowed it down for him. Wim. was slowed down back in 2001.

If anything HC are Federer's best surface and Novak proved at a very early age that he could kick everyone *** there.

Novak is far more perfect and there for far more likely to make the GS. We just have a lot of Federer fans that are haters, if this were a Federer vote the percentage would be in the 80% range.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Never said that, I said that grass was not Federer's best surface which it never was even after they slowed it down for him. Wim. was slowed down back in 2001.

If anything HC are Federer's best surface and Novak proved at a very early age that he could kick everyone *** there.

Novak is far more perfect and there for far more likely to make the GS. We just have a lot of Federer fans that are haters, if this were a Federer vote the percentage would be in the 80% range.

Whatever it was that you said, how did Nadal prove anything?
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
As there is no perfect player out there, the concept of a "most perfect player" must be created by a 12 year old

Wow, more denial as almost all Federer fans claimed that he was 100% perfect. Most perfect is a concept, too bad you thinking is little to understand it.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Never said that, I said that grass was not Federer's best surface which it never was even after they slowed it down for him. Wim. was slowed down back in 2001.

If anything HC are Federer's best surface and Novak proved at a very early age that he could kick everyone *** there.

Novak is far more perfect and there for far more likely to make the GS. We just have a lot of Federer fans that are haters, if this were a Federer vote the percentage would be in the 80% range.

What's next? Djokovic beats Federer on clay, therefore it's Federer's best surface?
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
What's next? Djokovic beats Federer on clay, therefore it's Federer's best surface?

Let's do this instead, why do you believe that grass is Federer's best surface? I could be wrong, let's look at the numbers and if the numbers prove otherwise I will graciously concede.
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Let's do this instead, why do you believe that grass is Federer's best surface? I could be wrong, let's look at the numbers and if the numbers prove otherwise I will graciously concede.

6 Wimbledon titles out of 7 consecutive finals, plus it's the only slam where he's beaten Nadal. Yeah, he has 9 HC slam titles, but there are two HC slams a year per grass slam. If Federer were as dominant on hard as he was on grass, he would have 12 HC slams.

You going to bring in numbers too? Or perhaps a lame joke or an even lamer GIF would be a better illustration of your nonexistent argument?
 
Last edited:

billnepill

Hall of Fame
:twisted:
Wow, more denial as almost all Federer fans claimed that he was 100% perfect. Most perfect is a concept, too bad you thinking is little to understand it.

Ouch , I guess now it is a suitable time to post that gif with the crying blonde .
Would fit nicely here
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
6 Wimbledon titles out of 7 consecutive finals, plus it's the only slam where he's beaten Nadal. Yeah, he has 9 HC slam titles, but there are two HC slams a year per grass slam. If Federer were as dominant on hard as he was on grass, he would have 12 HC slams.

So what you are saying is that we should ignore the total number of titles? I mean 9>6 right, does quality or quantity matter most? Certainly just because he has lost to Nadal more times at HC slams does not mean he is a lesser HC player?
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
So what you are saying is that we should ignore the total number of titles? I mean 9>6 right, does quality or quantity matter most? Certainly just because he has lost to Nadal more times at HC slams does not mean he is a lesser HC player?

Obviously you didn't even read my post.

Wimbledon-US Open: 6>5
Wimbledon-Australian Open: 6>4

No one but you is ignoring total number of titles. You're the one trying to argue that Novak is a better grass-court player than Federer, despite having far less titles on the surface.
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
Obviously you didn't even read my post.

Wimbledon-US Open: 6>5
Wimbledon-Australian Open: 6>4

No one but you is ignoring total number of titles. You're the one trying to argue that Novak is a better grass-court player than Federer, despite having far less titles on the surface.

Never said any of that, you are making up more lies. I said that Novak is far more capable and likely to make a CYGS than Federer ever was. Novak can defeat all players on all surfaces, while Federer could not.

16>10 right?
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Never said any of that, you are making up more lies. I said that Novak is far more capable and likely to make a CYGS than Federer ever was. Novak can defeat all players on all surfaces, while Federer could not.

16>10 right?

Novak is as close to perfection as any player can get, he can defeat all of the greats on their best surfaces, not like pretend perfect Federer.

You said he can beat all of the greats on their best surface, did you not? So, when grass is clearly Federer's preferred surface and Djokovic has yet to beat him there, how can you claim that?
 

FlashFlare11

Hall of Fame
Com'on, really? Numbers don't lie remember 16>10 right?

Absolutely right. So Federer having his best results at Wimbledon (6 titles, 1 runner-up) as opposed to any other individual slam is no lie either, right?

Honestly, if you're having difficult time understanding my argument after I've spelled it out for you, then I suggest you try again somewhere else, because you've lost here.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
Com'on, really? Numbers don't lie remember 16>10 right?

You're lost (again). 16>10 shows that at this point in time Fed is more accomplished player than Nadal. However regarding Wimbledon and AO&USO, the fact is>>>>>Fed dominated Wimbledon more than either of these slams (more titles and finals) so saying (modern) grass is Fed's preferred surface is not without basis at all.

The fact is that there is only one Wimbledon per year compared to two annual HC slams yet the difference in Fed's slam count on grass and HC is still only 3 slams despite that fact.

Wimbledon is Fed's most dominant slam, that's not an opinion but a fact.
 
Top