Muzz 0-5 in Australia is the big one
Federer: "My losses are to Nadal."
Roddick: "My losses are to Federer."
Murray: "My losses are to Federer and Djokovic."
Borg: "My losses are to Connors and McEnroe"
Lendl: "My losses are to Connors, McEnroe, Wilander, and Becker."
Djokovic: "Lets change the subject."
0-5 can only be somewhat matched by 3-7
How on Earth is never winning the title going to be matched with someone who still won it three times?
Ever divided any number by zero before?
But we need to look at context and eye test also.
Murray's losses were to GOAT, Djokovic
Djokovic losses are to lesser players.
Murray also lost to Federer at AO, not just Djokovic. So not all to GOAT.
And keep this in mind also, Djokovic has won USO by beating a five time champion, a four time champion and a one time time, for all three of his titles.
I get it you want to hate on Djokovic and his continual winning, but at least keep it within reasonable bounds.
And he made 2 out of 3 wins against other 2 goat candidates. Third win was against former US champion.But we need to look at context and eye test also.
Murray's losses were to GOAT, Djokovic
Djokovic losses are to lesser players.
Djokovic is the ultimate winner. Records show that. But there are inexplicable losses for a person of his stature. No hating.
Yeah, Djokovic is so bad at tennis.
Losses do happen, for any reason. Most players play their best on hard, not on clay or grass.Djokovic is the only player of the group to suffer a loss (three of them actually) to non-ATGs. I won't even mention the supposed HC GOAT angle.