What is your criteria for GOAT?

tank_job

Banned
GOAT criteria is to have a winning H2H with... anyone. Anyone will do.

Also, to be able to roll in clay like a dirty pig.
 

TheF1Bob

Banned
GOAT criteria is to have a winning H2H with... anyone. Anyone will do.

Also, to be able to roll in clay like a dirty pig.

0.jpg
 

kiki

Banned
INTT the criteria for GOAT is:

1/having a switzerland´s passport ( of course, only for men)

2/ sponsoring Gillete

3/ wearing a very expensive watch every match

Anybody that meets those 3 criteria, qualifies for GOATdom
 

World Beater

Hall of Fame
Look at the people he won against. Baghdatis. Roddick. 35 year old Agassi. Philippoussis. Seriously?

Fed's 2 victories against Nadal in Wimbledon are some of his most precious slams because he achieved them against his nemesis.

if winning slams was so easy, why aint you doing it?

btw. phillippousis has wins over sampras - they guy is no chump, and was considered one of the most poweful hitters and great talents (albeit a bit wasted). Flip played great that wimbledon.

baghdatis was a top player, not a great player but this because federer prevented him from winning the final.

Agassi was still very good at #35. Kinda like how gonzales was still good in his late thirties. Roddick has wins over sampras, agassi..won a usopen and was a #1 player.
 

pistolpower

New User
if winning slams was so easy, why aint you doing it?

btw. phillippousis has wins over sampras - they guy is no chump, and was considered one of the most poweful hitters and great talents (albeit a bit wasted). Flip played great that wimbledon.

baghdatis was a top player, not a great player but this because federer prevented him from winning the final.

Agassi was still very good at #35. Kinda like how gonzales was still good in his late thirties. Roddick has wins over sampras, agassi..won a usopen and was a #1 player.

phillippousis winning 11 titles / 1 masters was not consistant at all- he could have hit winners/errors both ways. (comparisson Safin winning 5 Masters, 1 Slam, yet not using his full potential)
Aggassi at 35 wasn't consistent as well.
Roddick in his early years was not winning almost anything.
 

World Beater

Hall of Fame
phillippousis winning 11 titles / 1 masters was not consistant at all- he could have hit winners/errors both ways. (comparisson Safin winning 5 Masters, 1 Slam, yet not using his full potential)
Aggassi at 35 wasn't consistent as well.
Roddick in his early years was not winning almost anything.

agassi in his later years was more consistent than when he was playing sampras in his prime...

this same inconsitent phillippousis CRUSHED sampras at the australian open. If it wasnt for a knee injury, he would have most probably beaten pete at wimbledon too.

Roddick was #1 when he was young. yeh he wasnt winning anything . LOL

when he was young, he was busy schooling sampras.
 

smoledman

G.O.A.T.
INTT the criteria for GOAT is:

1/having a switzerland´s passport ( of course, only for men)

2/ sponsoring Gillete

3/ wearing a very expensive watch every match

Anybody that meets those 3 criteria, qualifies for GOATdom

Agreed, don't forget Lindt chocolates.
 

pistolpower

New User
agassi in his later years was more consistent than when he was playing sampras in his prime...

this same inconsitent phillippousis CRUSHED sampras at the australian open. If it wasnt for a knee injury, he would have most probably beaten pete at wimbledon too.

Roddick was #1 when he was young. yeh he wasnt winning anything . LOL

when he was young, he was busy schooling sampras.
Probably you mean 2002 at the USO (3 sets for Pete) or 2002 at clay (that's probably the reason why he won one time more)
 
Top