And Nalbandian still nearly pissed that match down the drain more than once. It's insane how he gets into G.O.A.T discussions. He's the biggest mental midget ever.
In the past Nalbandian still wasn't a 'great' player. He had one fluke slam final and froze like an ice pop and played the match of his life in the US open semifinals against a guy who didn't wake up until the 4th set and still lost the match! Nalbandian's biggest title was merrited to the fact that everyone withdrew from the masters cup field. Essentially, Nalbandian wasn't in the top 8 to even contest in Shanghai.
For a guy that is completely discrediting nalby in this thread besides his 2hbh being good. You seem to acknowledge that he is one of the only players to ever beat federer when he's playing his best, or 'on'.
Federer CAN get away with giving excuses. Because if he did play his best against someone like Baghdatis of Berdych no matter how well those two are playing they still wouldn't win a set. Only guys like Nalbandian, Nadal, and Safin have beatn Federer when Federer is 'on'.
For a guy that is completely discrediting nalby in this thread besides his 2hbh being good. You seem to acknowledge that he is one of the only players to ever beat federer when he's playing his best, or 'on'.
There are varying degrees of "on". Nalbandian can beat Federer playing pretty well, and even then only indoors and possibly on clay. Safin, Nadal, and maybe Djokovic can all potentially beat Federer at his best, minus Safin on clay or grass and Djokovic on grass.
I don't know if it was mentioned, but in the TMC 2005 Federer was recovering from an ankle injury at the time, and was at maybe 80%. That's why he tanked for a while and almost made a comeback in the 5th set.