CanadianChic
Hall of Fame
Under duress I saw Mad Max and thought it was good. The payback for this will be Footloose.
![]()
Enjoyed it; it was a fun movie and had good action sequences, and other good moments, though a little too comedic at times. Overall, it doesn't fit my preferences in superhero movies, but it's still solid.
thanks for warning me about train wreck.
My elder bro told me that I should watch Mad Max in the theater, then i will enjoy it, it's fun. I cannot imagine how a movie I could not get through even 30 minutes of, would suddenly be fun in the theater !
You are fortunate to be a sureshsexual, not that there's anything good about that.15 seconds of suresh gif gives me more sustainable pleasure.
![]()
Enjoyed it; it was a fun movie and had good action sequences, and other good moments, though a little too comedic at times. Overall, it doesn't fit my preferences in superhero movies, but it's still solid.
The Revenant.
Do recommend - best film I've seen in a while.
If Leo doesn't get the Oscar it will be criminal (and will also remove the last shred of credibility those awards have).
You aren't leaving us, are you ?Au Revoir, Les Enfants (1987)
Watched the first 5 minutes of Deadpool, then fell asleep. Woke up as the end titles were rolling by. Some racy stuff in there! Kinda glad I didn't stay awake for the film, plus I needed the sleep.
I'm sorry, I don't know. I just watched the first 5 minutes, plus some of the end credits. I napped for most of the movie. Best $11.00 I've spent in a while.Ryan Reynolds' Green Lantern was so bad he had to turn down GL 2.
...Deadpool is just as bad in another way?![]()
Green Lantern sucked. Deadpool is inappropriately hilarious. I haven't felt that guilty laughing since Pulp Fiction.Ryan Reynolds' Green Lantern was so bad he had to turn down GL 2.
...Deadpool is just as bad in another way?![]()
I'm sorry, I don't know. I just watched the first 5 minutes, plus some of the end credits. I napped for most of the movie. Best $11.00 I've spent in a while.
Have a few thoughts about The Revenant which I saw just this past Saturday (and of course won the Globe last night), but I'll save those for the "Best Films" thread
"Hail, Caesar"
A dud from the Coen brothers. Happens now and then. No narrative, characters come and go, very few laughs.
I don't think you posted your thoughts about it, would love to hear them. I just saw "Embrace of the Serpent," I highly recommend it. Have you seen enough for a top 10 or top 5 of 2015 yet?
Before I get to the housecleaning, I find it quite interesting that most of the reviews of the latest Steve Jobs movie--which BTW is at least the 4th feature on the late Apple co-founder in as many years--have focused on whether it "captures" (whatever that means) the genius behind the man or what made him so special, when the real question we should be asking is why we need in the first place yet another film about a figure whose experience and faculties are so far removed from the rest of ours which today's film industry continues to ignore while churning out one superhero flick/blockbuster extravaganza after another. It's as if the studio heads have such contempt for us the middle class, let alone the poor who have always been neglected by filmmakers both commercial and arthouse (save notable exceptions including Chaplin, Naruse and Pasolini), that they can't be bothered to stoop to our level and find out what makes us tick. And I know many of us love to slam this very hypocrisy of the so-called Hollywood liberals who pay lip service and little else to the pet issues of social justice, gender equality and whatnot, but we have nobody but ourselves to blame (this goes especially for the professional critics who should know better) when we keep rewarding them with record box-office receipts without demanding meaningful changes.
The Revenant,while not technically a remake,is actually based on a story that has already been on the big screen before,the little known Man In The Wilderness. This is something that no reviews I've read of The Revenant have mentioned...Hey Moose, thanks for the recommendation and also for your newest addition to our unreturned-serves database (will post a separate reply later). I thought about reviewing the movie but decided that I just didn't care enough to waste a precious 15 minutes of my time on it (in addition to the near three hours in the theater). But since you asked, The Revenant is just the latest in a seemingly interminable series of safe bourgeois products churned out by the studios that purport to be more elevated than their superhero blockbusters but in the end don't provide us with a whole lot more than bland history lessons and/or glossy entertainment. Here's an old pertinent post of mine from last October:
Plenty of critics have already and correctly slammed the latest DiCaprio vehicle for its white male perspective, but the real problem has to do with more than race or gender and runs deeper than they are able or willing to acknowledge. For illustration you need look no further than critically acclaimed films like 12 Years a Slave which is, contrary to the history of millions of fellow African-Americans, the extraordinary story of the protagonist (originally a freeman) who spends the eponymous number of years toiling under bondage before being freed and reuniting with his family, or modern classics like like Schindler's List which presents the Holocaust from the highly atypical perspective of a German mercenary who later finds the humanity to save a bunch of Jews (as Kubrick wryly pointed out) while extolling the virtues of capitalism even in the most trying circumstances. And don't forget Selma, which was an above-average biopic at best (about such a hackneyed figure as MLK at that) but still touted by many critics as the best film of the year because it ticks off most of the PC benchmarks. Of course these happen to be the same fools whose idea of progress is getting the ratio between males and females or whites and blacks in the industry to a level they seem acceptable.
And even as a story of survival, perseverance, redemption and what have you The Revenant is simply YA lit compared to Rome, Open City, A Man Escaped and the recent Son of Saul. It's no wonder that when the film ends with Leo's character solemnly intoning (as well as he can--count me among the camp that felt the pretty boy was simply out of his depth in this grizzly role) about God being the only proper judge of human character (when he's about to have a man killed by his Indian pursuers, no less) the message feels so hollow and sanctimonious. And despite its impressive cinematography I thought the movie failed even as engrossing entertainment. I still say it's worth seeing, but not before other worthier contenders.
Speaking of which I'm hoping to participate in this marathon (this Saturday, not the one on 2/27--luckily enough I've yet to see any of the four on 2/20 while I've missed only Spotlight from the following Saturday) and will try to give my own top 5 after that, but here's what my tentative 2015 list would look like right now (roughly in this order), with links to my reviews if available:
Those last two shorts are among the five live-action Oscar contenders I saw this weekend along with their animated counterparts. Most of them are better than I suspect most features up vying for the best advertising in the industry (as I often note the Oscars/Golden Globes generally do a better job with foreign/indie productions than studio ones) and well worth seeing. See if similar marathons are happening in your neck of the woods.
- Son of Saul
- Carol
- Piku
- Ex Machina
- Tie between 2-3 shorts: Um século de energia (A Century of Power), Shok (Friend) and perhaps Day One
The Revenant,while not technically a remake,is actually based on a story that has already been on the big screen before,the little known Man In The Wilderness. This is something that no reviews I've read of The Revenant have mentioned...
I just finished watching Manglehorn. It took me four tries to get through it.
It's really, really slow. I thought it would be kinda, sorta like About Schmidt but it's something else.
He tapes pictures of his long lost love onto a sail boat throughout --a contrivance too far.
However Holly Hunter was good, Pacino has some good moments and there were some beautiful shots. Also, the actor that plays Pacino's son did a good job portraying a ***** that works in finance.
It has a happy ending which I didn't think would happen with a nod to the ending to Blow Up.
A slow character study with artful and sometimes pretentious touches.