Pan's Labyrinth. - second viewing, cried just like the first time. Beautiful masterpiece.
Seen Avengers: Endgame three times. The first time I went for the story and the plot. The second time I went to spot references and easter eggs.
This most recent time, I concentrated on the acting and what it did for the characters and their relationships.
It's about love, friendship, loyalty, sacrifice, and heroism--with some cosmic battles and universal consequences thrown in.
Why, thank you!I never would guess that someone with Laver as their avatar would see Avengers three times![]()
You may like this:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6263618/
Toni Erdmann kick ass but I figured out there are people on the world who dont get such movies..
"Cold War"
"Gloria Bell"
in theatres, TV-grade trials and tribulations of a divorced woman. There must be something better to see!
Seen Avengers: Endgame three times. The first time I went for the story and the plot. The second time I went to spot references and easter eggs.
This most recent time, I concentrated on the acting and what it did for the characters and their relationships.
It's about love, friendship, loyalty, sacrifice, and heroism--with some cosmic battles and universal consequences thrown in.
thanks for the recommendation. nice movie. Mum liked it.What Maisie knew
I really liked this adaptation of Henry James' novel. Subtle and brilliant acting by the cast, especially the child.
Wow thanks Senti, this is a pleasant surprise. I did not know that you planned on showing this. So how does it work? Do you take movies that people watch here, you watch it yourself and then show her?What Maisie Knew (2012)
Director: Scott_McGehee, David_Siegel.
Starring:. Julianne_Moore, Steve_Coogan, Alexander_Skarsgård, Joanna_Vanderham.
https://imdb.com/title/tt1932767/
thanks for the recommendation. nice movie. Mum liked it.
No, i don't first watch it, but I do check the story line, and sometimes check IMDB to see the parent advisory. I might even go through the subtitles to see if there isn't too much language.Wow thanks Senti, this is a pleasant surprise. I did not know that you planned on showing this. So how does it work? Do you take movies that people watch here, you watch it yourself and then show her?
Yes the movie is based on a novel. Child abuse is still rampant unfortunately. In this case it was pure selfishness on the parents' part. I don't understand why people have children when they are not mentally prepared to take on the responsibility of rearing a child. It was at least a solace to see that the partners of the child's parents often gave a lot more attention to the child. The most touching scene for me was when the child is uncared for, for a whole night and a drop of tear falls on the child's cheeks. The child knew more than what the parents thought she did. Poignant.No, i don't first watch it, but I do check the story line, and sometimes check IMDB to see the parent advisory. I might even go through the subtitles to see if there isn't too much language.
My mum was very touched by the girls plight, then after the movie she started reminiscing about her childhood and how innocent they were back then. No one back then was concerned about child abuse, and children often got left with strangers. She has often told me of all the cases she saw in parks and in the neighbourhood, people who fondled children and the children did not know what was going on.
She was also wondering how Child Services did not get involved, but then figured that this was based on a 1897 novel. I was actually waiting for Child Services to take the child away and was relieved it did not happen.
Manhattan is hands down my favourite Woody Allen movie. Hilarious dialogues.Watched Woody Allen's Manhattan (1979). I can't help but find it terrific. There are some indelible shots, and no one can match the boundless surplus of wit that permeates the dialogue. Some very good acting performances as well, the interplay between Diane Keaton and Allen is obviously the stuff of legend.
That said, in the age of MeToo it's hard to not feel a bit uncomfortable with the way Allen treats the relationship between his character and a 17-year-old girl (portrayed by Mariel Hemingway, granddaughter of Ernie). Allen's usual mode of scrutinizing ethical complexities is hardly applied to this part of the story. What Do We Do with the Art of Monstrous Men? asks Claire Dederer about said unease. For me, it doesn't deter me from enjoying the film for its artistic merits, but I can understand how some others aren't able to compartmentalize that way.
![]()
Another one I watched was Agnès Jaoui's Place publique (2018). Some celebrities and pals hold a chaotic moving-in party in the countryside outside of Paris. It all amounts to a critique of the foibles of the French bourgeoisie. Bit too much (or too tame?) farce for my taste, but the film certainly has its moments.
Manhattan is hands down my favourite Woody Allen movie. Hilarious dialogues.
Your point is interesting and something I incidentally contemplated when reading about Simone de Beauvoir yesterday. What's the legal age for consensus in France? What is it in US? I felt the same when watching Manhattan too and clearly its an abuse of power by the older man.
Interesting, in what context did the topic arise w/r/t Beauvoir?
I think the age of consent in the US varies from state to state, but in NY the age of consent is supposedly precisely 17, then as now. But it's a tricky law in terms of finding a balance between not criminalizing perfectly normal relationships (for example one partner being 16 & the other 17?) but still discouraging more obviously problematic relations.
![]()
Marathon !!!
Les Parapluies de Cherbourg (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, 1964), a musical romantic drama written and directed by Jacques Demy, starring Catherine Deneuve and Nino Castelnuovo, with a classic score by Michel Legrand. Set against a stylish and burstingly colorful backdrop, we follow the two star-crossed young lovers as their bond is tested by chance and circumstance. Well-known tropes, perhaps, but carried out with adroitness. While undoubtedly an homage to the Hollywood musical tradition, Demy's sensibilities are ultimately very much European, and he waves a middle-finger to the illusions of cinema and audiences' romantic expectations. Capital B Bittersweet.
more importantly, how elegant wasn't Catherine Deneuve in this role(powerfully acted as well.)
![]()
![]()
(a nice piece on the ambiguous role of the music score in the film's notorious final scene.
https://film.avclub.com/is-the-umbrellas-of-cherbourg-s-score-at-odds-with-its-1798242550)
edit: another nice homage from A.O. Scott:
This movie and Nostalgia are my favorite films of that genius called Andrei Tarkovski.
Imperishable work, a beauty rarely seen and much, much reflection of the human race.
Watched Woody Allen's Manhattan (1979). I can't help but find it terrific. There are some indelible shots, and no one can match the boundless surplus of wit that permeates the dialogue. Some very good acting performances as well, the interplay between Diane Keaton and Allen is obviously the stuff of legend.
That said, in the age of MeToo it's hard to not feel a bit uncomfortable with the way Allen treats the relationship between his character and a 17-year-old girl (portrayed by Mariel Hemingway, granddaughter of Ernie). Allen's usual mode of scrutinizing ethical complexities is hardly applied to this part of the story. What Do We Do with the Art of Monstrous Men? asks Claire Dederer about said unease. For me, it doesn't deter me from enjoying the film for its artistic merits, but I can understand how some others aren't able to compartmentalize that way.
![]()
Manhattan is hands down my favourite Woody Allen movie. Hilarious dialogues.
Your point is interesting and something I incidentally contemplated when reading about Simone de Beauvoir yesterday. What's the legal age for consensus in France? What is it in US? I felt the same when watching Manhattan too and clearly its an abuse of power by the older man.
Finished The Prisoner of Second Avenue last night.Started a Jack Lemmon / Anne Bancroft movie called The Prisoner of Second Avenue.
So I was invited to a group convo (courtesy of @AnOctorokForDinner) just last week... and turns out my very first contribution had to do with the movies! (You can thank/blame @helterskelter for that.) And it also happened to list some of the must-sees of 2019 (year of DC release, hence the inclusion of Cold War and The Image Book) that I've been able to catch thus far (so potential contenders including László Nemes' Sunset and Claire Denis' High Life are omitted). Here they are, in order of preference (though a critical ranking wouldn't look much different), accompanied by a capsule review or a link to an existing one:
Transit by Christian Petzold
Cold War directed by Paweł Pawlikowski
The Sower by Marine Francen
Leto by Kirill Serebrennikov
Ash Is Purest White by Jia Zhangke
The Image Book by Jean-Luc Godard
The Burial of Kojo by Blitz Bazawule
Working Woman by Michal Aviad
Long Day's Journey into Night by Bi Gan
I admit I'm cheating a bit with Leto which I was fortunate to see last Christmas (in Seoul of all places), but now that it's finally getting a US release starting this past Friday (not yet in my hood, alas) I'm spreading the word so more of you can bask in its sonic assault with fellow moviegoers.
On to the reviews:
You asked for a new recommendation, I give you Christian Petzold's Transit starring - drum roll - Franz Rogowski of In the Aisles (and the ubiquitous Paula Beer):
I must confess this was my very first encounter with the German auteur, but no matter - based on this film alone I'm ready to declare him a major figure of European cinema. It's remarkable how much mileage he gets out of Anna Seghers’s 1942 novel: the lines blur as the characters' social and temporal displacements turn existential and back, and though the film's ambiguous setting seems to evoke a distant if familiar past it also exposes the alienating facets of law and technology more forcefully than most films of more recent vintage. Easily one of the year's best, and I'm itching to explore the rest of his oeuvre.
P.S. After a long hiatus from the DC film scene Transit is now playing at the lovely Avalon Theatre. Don't miss this chance if you live nearby or happen to be visiting, and if not check your local listings.
It's hard to improve upon Giles Harvey's comprehensive review in Harper's, so let me just comment on one angle he might have overlooked: the richness of the film and its title is such that Pawlikowski might have taken a cue, however inadvertent, from the warfare of the heart in Laclos' masterpiece Dangerous Liaisons. The comparison would usually inspire instant howling, but not in this case. Hell, one could even argue that both suffer from the rare affliction of undue brevity.
As for the rest, I'm afraid Ash Is Purest White is not Jia's most masterful (among those I've seen I'd go with The World) and its parts are greater than their sum, especially when Transit beats it at its own game, but it's still good to see his ambitions unabated and I wish he will revisit his mythical environmentalism in a new feature. No such qualifications are necessary for lead actors Zhao Tao (Jia's off-screen wife and longtime collaborator) and Liao Fan, who are respectively flawless as the resilient heroine Zhao Qiao and her mousy boyfriend Guo Bin whose fall from street-justice grace propels the major plot turns:
With all due respect to Hou Hsiao-hsien, and despite my deep-seated reservations, I don't think it's arguable that Godard is the greatest filmmaker active today. Of course respect doesn't necessarily engender love, and the former again wins out in my appreciation of The Image Book which occasionally borders on obscurantist navel-gazing (Godard's own gravelly narration doesn't help). And while he's always been given to bursts of melancholy at the state of the world his swipes at cinema at large for its dereliction of responsibilities are out of step with the obvious love he retains for its greatest examples even as he attempts to distance himself with dizzying montages of dissociative alterations of said classics. Still a new Godard film is almost always a cause for celebration (the only work of his I've seen that didn't do anything for me is For Ever Mozart), and I invite all to see for themselves in their living room with speakers at a distance, as Godard meant it to be seen:
Blitz Bazawule's The Burial of Kojo, available on Netflix, is an exciting debut feature by the 37-year-old hip-hop and visual artist who has clearly not forgotten his Ghanaian roots despite having resided in the US since 2001 (the film is mostly told in Twi, with smatterings of English in between). Part magic realism, part Romeo and Juliet (which reminds me of Kenyan writer Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's The River Between, one of my few positive experiences in college), the film disappoints in its pat ending which dilutes its heartfelt critique of neoliberalism and neocolonialism, but this is a promising start by a young artist in his element. Let's hope he keeps on an even keel when Hollywood inevitably comes knocking:
#MeToo has its most bracing on-screen champion of the year in Working Woman, and Aviad is particularly perceptive in illustrating the folly and cruelty of discrediting women who "don't come forward" right away. Where the film falters is in the title heroine Orna's (Liron Ben Shlush) relationship with her chef husband Ofer (Oshri Cohen), which is mostly one cliche of man vs. woman after another. And this is decidedly a middle-class business world, with high-end clients to boot. But the focus is rightfully on the working woman everywhere, and as such it deserves a look:
Bi Gan's Long Day's Journey into Night (unrelated and clearly inferior to the 1956 Eugene O'Neill play of the same title) is my least favorite "must-see" of the year, and its troubles become evident early on when its hero Luo Hongwu (Huang Jue) muses in voiceover that films are always fake whereas memories are made of truth and lies, which almost stuns in its banality but seems to have been taken seriously by enough critics to have turned this into an indisputable arthouse hit (posting an impressive three-week gross of $41 million in China). And I'm still not sure if the film's much-hyped final sequence, an unbroken 59-minute long take, would've lost much if at all without the 3D treatment. That technical feat alone makes this worth seeing, just don't expect a life-changing romance because chances are you've seen it all before:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yPt3kQzxa8
And now some housekeeping:
Given that the original Gloria is arguably one of the best films of the century I was really surprised at how tame the remake was. I was still ready to give Lelio the benefit of the doubt as Disobedience, while a disappointing follow-up to A Fantastic Woman, had its moments and drew strong performances all around, but it does look like he's become too enamored with Hollywood. Hopefully this setback (at least at the box office) will make him rethink his career trajectory.
Not sure if you were being sarcastic, but I must say the Avengers bored me for the most part. I generally skip superhero movies and when I do go see 'em I'm acting less as an active spectator than as an anthropologist of sorts who's interested to find out what the fuss is about. But even I can appreciate the salubrious (if too reductive for adults) messaging and entertainment value of a Wonder Woman or Black Panther. Not here, and its climatic battle struck me as indiscriminate fan service to the max.
You make me want to see it again, as I find your interpretation interesting! I also saw Ordinary People long, long ago.Ordinary People, a 1980 movie. Sons in a well-off family have a boating accident, one lives, one dies. The family struggles to deal with the aftermath.
I'd seen it before, and would have described it as being about how a well functioning family tries to cope with a tragedy. Now I'd say that the tragedy doesn't so much cause trouble, as it reveals what has already been there. The trophy wife married the nerdy guy because she knew he'd bring home lots of money. As long as he makes money, and everyone does what they're supposed to do, she's down with the family. But if some turbulence comes along, she's like, "I didn't sign up for this, I'm outta here."
The boating tragedy creates a distraction which allows people to miss what it's really about, which is about class and money in America.
I read the book, and what the movie doesn't mention is that the Dad grew up in an orphanage. So he came from nothing, and is very pleased he does so well. The Mom is much more aware of social standing, they are kind of a strange couple. She was the beauty when they met, so what does she see in him? That he'll be a good earner, and that she can control him. He's never much thought about being popular, but she sure has. She loves having the image of the woman who's "got it all".You make me want to see it again, as I find your interpretation interesting! I also saw Ordinary People long, long ago.
Always be my maybe 8/10
''Always Be My Maybe is a 2019 American romantic comedy film, written by Ali Wong, Randall Park and Michael Golamco and directed by Nahnatchka Khan. It stars Wong and Park as childhood friends from San Francisco who have not been in touch since a brief teenaged fling ended badly.''
Been a while since I've watched an ol romcom. This was hilarious. Some tennis moments. We have tennis balls and goats in a world where nobody watches tennis. Keanu Reeves cameo as himself is as excellent as you would expect it to be. Two thumbs up.![]()
The TV wasn’t on, that was your reflection.Watched Godzilla
Watched Wes Anderson's The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (2004), featuring Bill Murray, Owen Wilson, Cate Blanchet, Willem Dafoe and others. With that, I have seen all of Anderson's movies save for his debut, Bottle Rocket (1996), which isn't as widely watched.
man.