What was the last movie you watched?

Discussion in 'Odds & Ends' started by jamesblakefan#1, Mar 22, 2010.

  1. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    8,391
    Skyfall. Say it yesterday. While it's pretty easy to pick holes in the plot - like the laughable computer security stuff - it was entertaining enough.

    The biggest disappointment with the film was that they put so much effort into painting it as being the best one yet - which it definitely was not.
     
  2. subz

    subz Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    366
    Ruby Sparks

    A pretty good movie. The theme is similar to "Stranger than fiction" but this one is more deep and serious affair. I looked it up on IMDB after watching and found an interesting fact: the actress who plays the lead role is also the screen writer ! Smart woman ...
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2012
  3. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    41,220
    What is your opinion of Deepak Chopra? Fraud/genuine guy/both?
     
  4. DRII

    DRII Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    7,470
    Genuine guy who somewhat fraudulently takes advantage of the naive...
     
  5. JRstriker12

    JRstriker12 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,398
    Saw Rise of the Guardians last week with my daughter.

    Decent kids flick. Loved the Elves, the Yeti, and they did a great job of refreshing the image of Santa and the Easter bunny.

    I mean Santa carries 2 swords and has tats. I would not want to be on his naughty list. LOL!
     
  6. Power Player

    Power Player Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    22,146
    Location:
    On my iPhone
    End Of Watch - Was loving this thing until towards the end when it just kind of became a cliche. The Mexican gangsters started off as somewhat legit, but that collapsed rather fast.

    The story basically built me up to expect more.

    That being said, it is a very solid rental.


    Also rewatched HEAT for the 10th or so time. Absolutely love it, even with Pacino's over acting. Just a great, great movie.
     
  7. 3fees

    3fees Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,954
    Location:
    NorCal
    Green Lantern
     
  8. Bobby Jr

    Bobby Jr Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    8,391
    More on this point... he gets shot with a depleted uranium round - gives it to the guy to analyse and they have a bios and photos on three people known to use those rounds ha ha.

    WTF?
     
  9. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    WTF??? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk7vgOU2Ho8
     
  10. Polaris

    Polaris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,320
    Chopra is either delusional or a fraud. I wish he was just the former, but I think he is the latter. Early on in his life, he seems to have realized that the Western world is ripe to be duped by his brand of Mysticism Lite, so he moved in for the jackpot.

    BTW, last movie: Lincoln. Daniel Day-Lewis is really, really good.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  11. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,463
    ^ I see no reason to consider him either delusional or fraudulent. He's a popularizer who tries to simplify the message a bit for the masses, not in itself a bad thing. Popularizers tend to be targets because of envy of their commercial success; Carl Sagan was a competent scientist (per my brother who was a friend and colleague of his) who also was ripped because he was able to cash in while simplifying things for the TV audience.
     
  12. JRstriker12

    JRstriker12 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,398
    Thanks for the info. Very badazz.
     
  13. Polaris

    Polaris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,320
    Wrong tree, I'm afraid. I've got no problem with Chopra being a popularizer, but a big problem with what he is popularizing and how he is doing it.

    I adored Carl Sagan. Your brother is right, he was a competent scientist who got ripped for being a popularizer of science rather than doing the lab/theoretical/experimental work that scientists do. That perception of Sagan was only accurate regarding his later years. Before Sagan became Mr. Science, he had several important contributions in astronomy, notably regarding the greenhouse effect on Venus.

    There is a big difference though: Sagan's populism was for scientific, i.e., properly verifiable, things. Deepak Chopra popularizes a warped and cherry-picked version of eastern culture. I grew up in India, and have a fairly good grasp of the things that Chopra appropriates from the culture and wraps into his own clarified bullshit. On related matters, it is entertaining to see people like Leonard Mlodinov or Sam Harris or Michael Shermer debate Chopra, but therein lies the problem. By associating their names with him, they give Chopra much-needed credibility. With them, he is an unusual spiritual thinker. Without them, he is just a fool.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  14. zapvor

    zapvor G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,285
    Location:
    tennis courts
    you know whats weird-iron fist isnt being released in most places?????
     
  15. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    41,220
    What Carl Sagan said was within the confines of known science. He had also published many papers before he took on the popularizer role.

    Deepak Chopra was also a successful doctor before he turned into a popularizer. But he does not confine himself to science. He injects spirituality and mysticism into his work and uses words like "quantum" in inappropriate situations. That does not mean that a holistic approach is not good. He also talks about many useful things. But he has ventured into domains where he cannot be rigorous about facts. When electrical activity in the brain was noticed after death, he proclaimed that evidence for the soul had been found. It turned out that rats also show the same "evidence." It is basically the residual electricity discharging through the neural circuits. For him, just the news was enough to talk about the soul.

    He has done a great job of picking pieces of Eastern philosophies and packaging them for Western consumption. Many have done that before him, but as a doctor, he has to be held to a higher scientific standard compared to a Swami or a Yogi who has simply studied scripture all his life as part of a monastic tradition and has not had exposure to modern education.
     
  16. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,463
    Che Guevara was a physician too but it has little to do with his career of political activism. Likewise Chopra, who's really well into a second career that his little to do with science. Sure, he uses and abuses scientific jargon at times, but what philosopher or religious zealot doesn't. That he deviates from standard eastern dogma is immaterial; his own explanation of things is not necessarily any less legitimate than anyone else's.
     
  17. sureshs

    sureshs Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Messages:
    41,220
    But what is his own explanation?
     
  18. Polaris

    Polaris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,320
    Legitimate from what standpoint? From the point of view of a man's right to freedom of speech? From the point of view of a man's lawful right to his own livelihood in whatever manner he chooses? Yes, of course. It is his right to say and do whatever he wants. It is mine to claim that he is, nevertheless, either fraudulent or delusional, and that his views have no basis in observable reality.

    He doesn't have one. He has what can only be described as an obfuscation. In a less civilized but altogether more accurate vein, one may say that Deepak Chopra is full of shit. :)

    Yes, he routinely invokes quantum theory and non-local phenomena and claims that these prove the existence of the soul or the infinite or some silly thing like that. He has shown repeatedly, under scrutinizing questions from physicists, that he does not understand even a whit of quantum mechanics yet he shamelessly appropriates terms from it, with the deliberate aim of misleading the public. And the public is, mostly, ready to be misled.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2012
  19. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,463
    ^ Well, no, strictly speaking you have a right to BELIEVE but no right to CLAIM that a person is fraudulent or delusional unless the majority of the evidence supports you. As religious or philosophical beliefs have always been held excempt from a diagnosis of delusional, and expression of religious/philosohical beliefs are not considered fraud, you would have no legal protection and could be cited for slander or defamation.
     
  20. johndagolfer

    johndagolfer Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    871
    Lincoln! Didn't think I would like it, but was pulled in from the very beginning.

    Thought it might have been 5-10 minutes too long, but otherwise now on my allt-time favorite list. Daniel Day Lewis will win best actor
     
  21. ga tennis

    ga tennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,710
    I agree......
     
  22. JoelDali

    JoelDali G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    11,728
    Silver Linings Playbook.

    Meh.

    7.5/10

    If you are suicidal over a chick don't see this movie.
     
  23. adamX012

    adamX012 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    311
    dance with waltz. boring...
     
  24. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,624
    The last movie I watched was Piranha. It was pretty good.
     
  25. Bartelby

    Bartelby G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    17,254
    Was it fish and chip night?


     
  26. chrischris

    chrischris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,359
    Where did the movie take Plaice?
     
  27. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,624
    It took place I believe in Arizona. Its the 2010 version. It had a lot of blood and gore but there was quite a bit of comedy mixed in.

    Bartelby, it makes me not want to go swimming. lol I'd rather be eaten by a shark than be shredded by hundreds of piranhas.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2012
  28. Ronaldo

    Ronaldo G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    17,650
    Lake Havasu, Arizona. Did not want to use the real name of the lake in the film to avoid loss of tourism.
     
  29. JoelDali

    JoelDali G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    11,728
    They found high concentrations of water herpes in the lake last summer. Be careful swimming there.
     
  30. chrischris

    chrischris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,359
    Ok, so it wasnt in the ground water outside W. Street when stocks flounder.
     
  31. Polaris

    Polaris Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,320
    Understood. And I agree with every word of that post.
     
  32. FuriousYellow

    FuriousYellow Professional

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,484
    Agreed. The ending had that same last minute re-edit feel of Spielberg's A.I. It looked like he originally planned to end the film with Lincoln leaving the White House for Ford's Theatre.

    Lewis' performance was outstanding. I was really surprised by the casting of Sally Field as well as the portrayal of Mary Todd Lincoln. I also couldn't help but notice how much of "Saving Private Ryan's" score was re-used in this movie.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2012
  33. TennisLovaLova

    TennisLovaLova Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2011
    Messages:
    3,127
    Sherlock Holmes: Game of Shadows
    Stopped after 40 minutes: boring, bad acting, stupid fight scenes and weird time anticipation system used by director made it seem weird.
    1/10
     
  34. gamerx52986

    gamerx52986 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Clearwater,Florida
    Watched Dark Knight Rises on my new tv last night and it was pretty good. Not my favorite of the Christopher Nolan Batman movies but decent none the less. Picked up The Bourne Legacy today but have not watched it.
     
  35. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,624
    I saw the human centipede 2 last night, it wasn't that great. I preferred the first one more. The main character is just really messed up and he doesn't even talk in the entire movie. It was gory but it was also really goofy at the same time. Also the picture quality is kind of weird in terms of colors used, its very bland maybe to tone down the blood and gore.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2012
  36. PrincessAdam

    PrincessAdam Rookie

    Joined:
    May 8, 2012
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Shreveport, Louisiana
    Red Lights. I got it at redbox. Anybody else see this? I thought it was really good. Had a lot of popular actors in it. De niro was in it
     
  37. Hood_Man

    Hood_Man Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,459
    Location:
    Wales
    Thursday night was Great Expectations, which apart from an impressive cast was decidedly meh.

    Tonight was The Hobbit, which was a lot of fun but felt like a filmmaker compelled to do something out of loyalty rather than passion. A very pleasant return to Middle Earth, and a very very good film too, but it just doesn't have the magic that the LOTR trilogy had.

    Martin Freeman is an excellent Bilbo though.
     
  38. accidental

    accidental Professional

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,008
    Watched Skyfall last night.

    Was ok. Not bad for a Bond movie, but the plot didnt make a great deal of sense. Felt more just like a standard action movie.
     
  39. Hood_Man

    Hood_Man Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,459
    Location:
    Wales
    I also saw Skyfall, second viewing. I enjoyed it a lot more this time round, and I'd enjoyed it a lot the first time I saw it a few weeks ago :)

    Fantastic to see it doing so phenomenally well around the world too.
     
  40. Crisstti

    Crisstti Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,354
    Location:
    Chile
    I watched Ted a few days ago. Loved it. Thought it was hilarious and sweet :)
    People even clapped at the end, and that's very unusual in my experience.
     
  41. maleyoyo

    maleyoyo Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Messages:
    419
    Finally watched The Hunger Games to understand all the hype with the books and movie. Wow this is how adults entertain our youth today…by glorifying kids killing kids. Can’t wait for more sequels, prequels, reality shows.
     
  42. LanEvo

    LanEvo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,654
    I thought the same thing, they didn't really tailor it to the ones who did not read the books, I haven't. And I felt lost when I watched it, I was like wth is going on...?
     
  43. zapvor

    zapvor G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,285
    Location:
    tennis courts
    man with iron fists!
     
  44. DRII

    DRII Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    7,470
    The whole movie seemed put together and scrambled at the last minute.

    Don't get me wrong it was above decent, but it did not gel. Some of the performances were Oscar worthy.

    Tommy Lee Jones stole the show!
     
  45. MomentumGT

    MomentumGT Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    637
    Location:
    Riverside/Stockton CA
    How was it? I'm very interested in seeing it

    -Jon
     
  46. johndagolfer

    johndagolfer Professional

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    871
    I disagree. I thought 95% of the movie was outstanding. I just think that the ending was pieced together in a way that made if obvious there was a different ending point. Besides that I think this was an excellent movie.
     
  47. Cormorant

    Cormorant Professional

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,222
    A Christmas triple bill of 'A Midnight Clear'(http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RcLFX5Ymac), 'Comfort and Joy'(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsw1I15Fj9I), and 'O Henry's Full House'(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q10izkMlXP0) has nudged me a little closer to getting into the spirit of things.

    The latter movie was underwhelming, but the first two were more interesting. One's a war film about some Germans and Americans based on the periphery of the Battle of the Bulge, and the other ('Comfort and Joy') is a wry comedy about a radio DJ who's entangled in a dangerous dispute between Italian families who are at each others throats over territory to sell...ice cream. It's going to take a hell of an Xmas film to supplant the enjoyable lunacy of a comedy-drama that sets a war over gelato at Christmas time, as 'Comfort and Joy' is probably now my favourite holiday picture. In order, I'd rate the films 3/5, 4/5, and 2/5.
     
  48. quest01

    quest01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,624
    Delete.....
     
    Last edited: Dec 25, 2012
  49. ollinger

    ollinger Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,463
    Lincoln

    Political hardball -- remarkable how little things have changed. Kudos to Spielberg for having the guts to shoot an 1860s indoor film with the lousy lighting of that era. Well acted but needed a little more juice to justify 2 1/2 hours.
     
  50. Pacific lefty

    Pacific lefty Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    272
    Location:
    Europe
    Miracle on 34th Street

    Sometimes it's fantastic just to believe in things we can't disprove....
     

Share This Page