Hitman
Bionic Poster
Lots of fans simply can’t let go
It's been a pretty decent AO so far also.
Lots of fans simply can’t let go
Nadal USO 10 vs Roddick USO 03 10 match series?Why must you always troll lol.
I am not sure about the first one tbf it's kinda irrelevant as well.Why must you always troll lol.
Murray AO 10 QF FTW
I guess just putting up a fight wasn’t enough anymore if it wasn’t gonna lead to a win after the previous 3 years.
Ferrero played very poorly and Safin arrived exhausted.
His biggest rival was Nalbandián in that edition.
Wimbledon 2014 was pretty tough for Djokovic.
Stepanek, Simon, Tsonga, Cilic, Dimitrov and Fed, all of them in great/solid form and dangerous on grass
Lol Wawrinka on grass, u're laughable. Tsonga and Cilic above him anyday on grass.No Nadal. No Murray. No slam-nemesis Wawrinka. Take out old Federer and it looks like the path of a 250/500 event, lol
And Djokovic was #1, Nadal was #2, Murray was #3 and Fed #4, it's impossible to play against all of them, it's a simple math really lolNo Nadal. No Murray. No slam-nemesis Wawrinka. Take out old Federer and it looks like the path of a 250/500 event, lol.
Lol Wawrinka on grass, u're laughable. Tsonga and Cilic above him anyday on grass.
And Djokovic was #1, Nadal was #2, Murray was #3 and Fed #4, it's impossible to play against all of them, it's a simple math really lol
Are u trolling or what, Wawrinka on grass is Kuerten/Ferrero level at best. Non factor reallyWawrinka was somewhat laughable on clay and hard as well, but that didn't stop him from beating peak/prime Nole at the AO and RG and the USO.
Yes, he could only face two of them, but he ended up facing only one...and it wasn't his contemporary Nadal or Murray, but PastGen Federer.
Djokovic would have liked his chances against Nadal at Wimbledon in 2012-2015 period but Nadal wasn't good enough to beat players outside of top 100
Well Djokovic was not on the same level as Kyrgios or Darcis but I'm pretty sure he would take a set or two against Nadal in those years lolI'm sure he and his fans much preferred his chances against the likes of Tsonga/Cilic/Dimitrov, lol.
He really was.Ferrero was far from poor lol.
That's why I said it, Federer fans remember something different to praise the victory of their favorite player.He also saw Nadal's level until the SF and knew there was no chance. Before the event, he fancied his chances more probably after the close match they had on Hamburg, but Nadal was playing incredible tennis aside from that dip in the 3rd vs Djokovic and it was clear as day he was winning the final regardless of the opponent.
Ferrero was good until 4-4 in the first when he had BP to serve for it. Federer saved it and broke in the following game to take the set and then Ferrero threw in the towel.
A similar situation happened in the match vs Nalbandian when Federer was serving 5-5 15-40 and won it 7-5, although Nalbandian stayed in the match and made it competitive all the way through.
How did you come to that conclusion exactly? It was only set 2 where he was relatively poor. Unless Federer was distinctly average or something there's no way Ferrero was poor. He had more break chances in the first set, just got outclutched and in set 3 Federer was in full flight but Ferrero kept the scoreline respectable.He really was.
Nalbandian was as good as AO 2012 Murray thoughFerrero played very poorly and Safin arrived exhausted.
His biggest rival was Nalbandián in that edition.