What's more impressive: winning the Calendar Year Grand Slam, or winning 6 Slams in a row?

What's more impressive: winning the Calendar Year Grand Slam, or winning 6 Slams in a row?

  • Winning the CYGS is more impressive

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Winning 6 Slams in a row is more impressive

    Votes: 9 75.0%

  • Total voters
    12

thomasferrett

Hall of Fame
It's possible to win a maximum of 6 Slams in a row without winning the CYGS. That's if you win French, Wimbledon, US, Australian, French, and Wimbledon.

Is that more or less impressive than winning the CYGS?
 

Lord Anomander

Professional
To me sheer numbers count whereas I couldn't care less if it's done with a two month break in between or not. However, I don't see either of it happening in the next couple of years.
 
D

Deleted member 77403

Guest
It's possible to win a maximum of 6 Slams in a row without winning the CYGS. That's if you win French, Wimbledon, US, Australian, French, and Wimbledon.

Is that more or less impressive than winning the CYGS?

Well Navratilova has done what you have stated, six slams in a row over two years. I guess the question is, what gets talked about the most as being more impressive, what she did, or the CYGS that Graf did. Personally, I would take six in a row, but historically, the CYGS seems to be given a deeper significance.
 
D

Deleted member 410229

Guest
I'm not impressed by djokovic so far, just your average pusher getting lucky cause proper fedal is not around.
 
Top