Big_Dangerous
Talk Tennis Guru
Does a win over Wawrinka yesterday count?
You can leave off the "soon" part.Useless mug, just like Raonic.
Has 0 chance at winning a grand slam anytime soon.
If Nishikori wins, it will not be against a top player but a 17th seed. If Fed wins, it means his form is solid and therefore Nishi has lost to a top player and it will be added to his losing tally.
Nishikori sucks. How is this clown a top guy?
Important lesson learned.Maybe deserves a bump after blowing 4 match points against Da Professor just a few minutes ago!
Important lesson learned.
Nishikori to win USO.
Can't find any.Don't know bout that.
Show me the two good ones.
With bones of glass, I don't see that happening, unless someone bangs a gong!![]()
Missing 60's Weed SoBad!Classic thread.
I miss AngieB.I miss 60's Weed!!!
Krygios beat Murray at Queens. He's 6-11 overall.Nishikori and Cilic are running as the best mug against Big 3 + Murray!
NISHIKORI
2 - 4 Federer
2- 10 Nadal
2 -15 Djokovic
2 - 9 Murray
TOTAL: 8 - 38
CILIC
2 - 15 Djokovic
1 - 9 Federer
2 - 6 Nadal
3 - 12 Murray
TOTAL: 8 - 42
Cilic is leading, but Nishikor only 4 matches behind.
Can't include Dimtrot and Crigioz as they haven't scored a win against all minimum 1.
Nishikori and Cilic are running as the best mug against Big 3 + Murray!
NISHIKORI
2 - 4 Federer
2- 10 Nadal
2 -15 Djokovic
2 - 9 Murray
TOTAL: 8 - 38
CILIC
2 - 15 Djokovic
1 - 9 Federer
2 - 6 Nadal
3 - 12 Murray
TOTAL: 8 - 42
OP would have suggested he just forfeit the match.He needs to retire at this point
I still haven't found the 2 good ones, sorry if that's what you're bumping for.bump
![]()
My sig shall never change!TTW will never forfeit 60s Weed.
#candleinthewind
As maligned as he is, Nick Kyrgios can boast he has 15 career wins vs top 10 players including Nadal (2x), fedr, Joe Kovic (2x) and Stanimal (2x), all multiple slam winners. The paper that covers his rock is The Muzziah.Like everyone else, pretty much.
yeah there's a fewAs maligned as he is, Nick Kyrgios can boast he has 15 career wins vs top 10 players including Nadal (2x), fedr, Joe Kovic (2x) and Stanimal (2x), all multiple slam winners. The paper that covers his rock is The Muzziah.
LMAO @ the Nishikori haters. If he had opportunity to remotely peak around 2003-2007, very different tunes would be sung///The views on Nishikori is obviously highly polarized. All the way from "total Mug" to "highly underrated"
![]()
Lol, Hewitt k1cked his a1s in Ninjas best year 2014, Im sure he could deal with the Ninja in his earlier days tooLMAO @ the Nishikori haters. If he had opportunity to remotely peak around 2003-2007, very different tunes would be sung///
Nishikori has the talent to beat everyone, but he is too kind to his fans and plays too much. Playing bunch of mickey mouse instead of spending quiet time at hospitals, ortho clinics, and rehabilitation resorts, even in the winter! Plus he refuses to bribe directors and gets stiffed on draws. After 8 years of hard work, 50 pounds of weight-loss, and tremendous improvement, Baghdatis has moved from slams in 2003 – 2007 to challengers these days. And YET, people wonder why the much-improved Federer was sailing slamless for many years, getting stomped repeatedly by the likes of injured Nishikori.Lol, Hewitt k1cked his a1s in Ninjas best year 2014, Im sure he could deal with the Ninja in his earlier days too. By the way - how was Nishikori supposed to get past Federer and Nadal 2003-2007?
.
Rogers slam-less years was because of one man, peak-Djokovic. If not for him Roger would have won slams every year sinse 2003, except injury-season 2013.Nishikori has the talent to beat everyone, but he is too kind to his fans and plays too much. Playing bunch of mickey mouse instead of spending quiet time at hospitals, ortho clinics, and rehabilitation resorts, even in the winter! Plus he refuses to bribe directors and gets stiffed on draws. After 8 years of hard work, 50 pounds of weight-loss, and tremendous improvement, Baghdatis has moved from slams in 2003 – 2007 to challengers these days. And YET, people wonder why the much-improved Federer was sailing slamless for many years, getting stomped repeatedly by the likes of injured Nishikori.
LOL...”getting stomped repeatedly by the likes of injured Nishikori.” The h2h is 6-2 fedr with both losses in three sets at MS1000s. In fact, the argument could be made that edging by fedr took so much out of Glassikori that he lost in straight sets the next round to Pablo Andujar at Madrid’13 and gave a walkover to Joe Kovic at Miami’14.Nishikori has the talent to beat everyone, but he is too kind to his fans and plays too much. Playing bunch of mickey mouse instead of spending quiet time at hospitals, ortho clinics, and rehabilitation resorts, even in the winter! Plus he refuses to bribe directors and gets stiffed on draws. After 8 years of hard work, 50 pounds of weight-loss, and tremendous improvement, Baghdatis has moved from slams in 2003 – 2007 to challengers these days. And YET, people wonder why the much-improved Federer was sailing slamless for many years, getting stomped repeatedly by the likes of injured Nishikori.
Is this about the 2003-2007 when one had to battle the likes of Ginepri in the semis to bag a cheap USO title?LOL...”getting stomped repeatedly by the likes of injured Nishikori.” The h2h is 6-2 fedr with both losses in three sets at MS1000s. In fact, the argument could be made that edging by fedr took so much out of Glassikori that he lost in straight sets the next round to Pablo Andujar at Madrid’13 and gave a walkover to Joe Kovic at Miami’14.
Please persist in your weak era revisionist history though...I find it rather amusing!
Are you on drugs? fedr faced Ginepri once at the USO in ‘01 2R. Ginepri made SFs there in ‘05 and lost in 5 to Agassi.Is this about the 2003-2007 when one had to battle the likes of Ginepri in the semis to bag a cheap USO title?
Agasi couldn't hang with Sampras, while Nishikori is on par with Nadal on clay.Are you on drugs? fedr faced Ginepri once at the USO in ‘01 2R. Ginepri made SFs there in ‘05 and lost in 5 to Agassi.
As I said, keep up your weak era revisionist history. It is getting even more hilarious by the poast.
Get back on your meds! This poast is signature worthy!Agasi couldn't hang with Sampras, while Nishikori is on par with Nadal on clay.
Saved for posterity!Agasi couldn't hang with Sampras, while Nishikori is on par with Nadal on clay.