What's the most impressive men’s tennis match winning streak in Open Era?

5555

Hall of Fame
Interesting take by by Carl Bialik http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2011/05/16/the-dominant-djokovic-streak/



"If Novak Djokovic wins seven matches in Paris at the French Open, which starts next week, he’ll have tied Guillermo Vilas’s Open-era record for most consecutive wins, with 46 — and he’ll have his first French Open crown. But by some measures, he already has the most impressive men’s tennis winning streak in modern history.

Djokovic extended his streak, which began six months ago with his two wins in Serbia’s triumph in the Davis Cup, by beating Rafael Nadal in the Rome final on Sunday. He has now won all 37 matches he’s played this year, and 39 straight overall. That ranks sixth best all time, and second best in the past 15 years, behind Roger Federer‘s 41 consecutive match wins between fall 2006 and spring 2007. Comparing Djokovic’s run to Federer’s 41 straight — and to his 35 straight in 2005, the next best streak in the past 15 years — makes more sense than comparing Djokovic’s run to Vilas’s, which came when top pros played many more small tournaments. Twice in finals during his run, Vilas beat players ranked outside the Top 25 — and one of them was outside the Top 100. (The most recent streak of 35 or more wins besides Djokovic’s and Federer’s was Thomas Muster‘s in 1995, with all 35 wins coming on clay.)

Federer’s streaks were certainly impressive, and dominant: In each he won two Grand Slam tournaments and one Masters event, the next tier down; the later streak also included a tour final, a once-a-year event somewhere in between a Masters event and a major. Djokovic, though, has won a major and four Masters events during his streak. Winning those may be even harder than winning a major, judging from top players’ records in those events: Though there are nine each season, Federer has just 17 titles compared to 16 at the four-times-a-year majors, while Nadal has the most Masters titles ever — 19, just three more than Federer’s record for most majors. With four Masters events left in the calendar, Djokovic has four chances to break the record for Masters titles in a single season (four), which Federer and Nadal each have accomplished.

Moreover, Djokovic has been more dominant in his streak than Federer was in his, and against tougher competition. He’s won 90% of his sets and 65% of games, while serving up a bagel set every 10 sets. In Federer’s first streak he won 89% of sets and 61% of games, with a bagel every 19 sets. His second, longer streak, was closer to Djokovic’s level, with 93% of sets won and 63% of games, and a bagel every 12 sets. Even more impressively, Djokovic has faced and beaten top competition repeatedly. Just three of his opponents ranked outside the Top 100 (and one of those, James Blake, is a former Top Five player.) Federer faced four players outside the Top 100 in each streak. Djokovic’s opponents’ median ranking has been 21, compared to 25 in Federer’s more recent streak and 35 in his earlier one. And Djokovic particularly has stared down his top competition, beating Top Five players 10 times and fellow Top Three players seven times — Nadal four times and Federer three times. That’s more than Federer’s number of matches against competition that good in his two streaks combined: Just nine matches against Top Five players and just two against players in the top three, including, crucially, just one against Nadal, who has won two-thirds of their career meetings. Djokovic had a losing record against both Federer and Nadal before the streak, and still does, but he’s significantly narrowed the gap against both of them.
"
 
"John McEnroe believes that the 37-match winning streak that Novak Djokovic has put together in 2011 is even more impressive than the record-breaking run of 42 wins that the American registered in 1984.

McEnroe, who revealed that he is to return to the Royal Albert Hall in London for the AEGON Masters Tennis tournament in December, has been amazed by what he has seen from the Serbian player.

“Given that there’s more competition, more athleticism and deeper fields now, I’d say his record is even more impressive than mine”, said McEnroe.

“Especially given that in 1984, the major in Australia was played at the end of the year, whereas he had to win it (as part of his streak). I was coming into my first Grand Slam of the year at the French, where the streak was broken (in the final against Ivan Lendl). So things are different. Also, he came into the year at No.3 and to be able to dominate [higher ranked players] the way he has, well, to put it mildly, it’s been quite amazing to see what he’s done and how much more confidently he’s playing.”
" http://novakdjokovic.com/en/news/tennis/mcenroe-novaks-winning-streak-is-more-impressive-then-mine/
 
Last edited:
Most impressive in my opinion with regard to quality of competition are Djokovic's and Federer's, then McEnroe's.

Vilas used to be considered to have the longest streak with 46 in 1977. But in the wikipedia page listing open era tennis records, they now list Borg at 49 in 1978. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Open_Era_tennis_records#Men_2

Borg's streak in officially recognized ATP matches is 43, from early March till the USO final of 1978, but if you add some non-ATP/invitational/special event wins he had that summer it brings the total up to 49. Those are listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjorn_Borg_career_statistics
 
Vilas has the record with 50. ATP should include the Rye tournament. Pre open Emerson had a streak of 55 in 1964, Budge of 92 in official matches.
 
Most impressive in my opinion with regard to quality of competition are Djokovic's and Federer's, then McEnroe's.

Vilas used to be considered to have the longest streak with 46 in 1977. But in the wikipedia page listing open era tennis records, they now list Borg at 49 in 1978. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Open_Era_tennis_records#Men_2

Borg's streak in officially recognized ATP matches is 43, from early March till the USO final of 1978, but if you add some non-ATP/invitational/special event wins he had that summer it brings the total up to 49. Those are listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjorn_Borg_career_statistics

Borg had walkover losses, didn't he? That snaps any winning streak, even though it doesn't count on head-to-head and win-loss records.
 
Borg had walkover losses, didn't he? That snaps any winning streak, even though it doesn't count on head-to-head and win-loss records.

Yes, he does have a couple of walkover losses. I am not sure what the general consensus is on whether they snap winning streaks or not.
 
I’ve been thinking about this topic of winning streaks and walkover losses. There was a post by Moose Malloy where he asked the ATP this question. They replied that WO losses do indeed break winning streaks. Yet during Nadal’s clay winning streak, when he felt dizzy in Rome and it wasn’t certain if he was going to play his next match, an ATP spokesman commented that "a withdrawal is not considered a loss or a win," which of course it isn’t for the W/L record, but he didn’t specify whether it breaks the winning streak or not. http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=2270648&postcount=2

Other posters have commented that the streak is broken because during such a streak you have to be the winner of the tournaments within it (except the last one where you lost). You can’t have a winning streak containing tournaments you didn’t win.

Maybe. I don’t know. To me, the walkover loss becomes more important the later it occurs, as obviously if you are on a potentially record-breaking streak you might be more tempted to withdraw from a match just to protect it. I haven’t found any clear official statements about this topic.

Maybe these streaks should be clasiffied in two groups, those with WO losses and those without them. Then there is the issue of what kind of matches count as official. All very subjective, as these guys were playing all kinds of special events, exos, etc. If you count them, there may be wins or losses in those events that would change the outcome.
 
Yes, he does have a couple of walkover losses. I am not sure what the general consensus is on whether they snap winning streaks or not.

You can't pull out of a scheduled match, and then say the winning streak is still ongoing.
 
Back
Top