When Novak Djokovic Turns Beast Mode On

#10
"Let's see you do better" is a bad argument.
I just picture the posters in here behind their computers leering off all this stuff. And it’s not nice pictures I get in the head to say it mildly.
Like in the other place two of the biggest fighters of the sport lacking anticipation. Hello.

Nah, and I love to see all of Nadals haters in here on court w Rafa. Let’s see if they would tell any of the crap they say every day to his face.

Nadal you looked really weak in Doha
Hahahaha
Don’t think that poster ever seen Rafa play live.
Rafa and weak in the same sentence is not a possibility, hasn’t been a possibility since Rafa was 16 years old.
 
#11
I just picture the posters in here behind their computers leering off all this stuff. And it’s not nice pictures I get in the head to say it mildly.
Like in the other place two of the biggest fighters of the sport lacking anticipation. Hello.

Nah, and I love to see all of Nadals haters in here on court w Rafa. Let’s see if they would tell any of the crap they say every day to his face.

Nadal you looked really weak in Doha
Hahahaha
Don’t think that poster ever seen Rafa play live.
Rafa and weak in the same sentence is not a possibility, hasn’t been a possibility since Rafa was 16 years old.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LetsSeeYOUDoBetter
 
#18
It wouldn't make much sense to laugh when he has a 5-19 record against him. Instead of laughing, let's see if he can rise from the ashes and replicate Djokovic's 2nd half of 2018. Highly doubtful at this point.
This 5-19 arguments is dumb because it has more to do with consistency than peak level. No one has said Wawa can keep a high level on for as long as Djokovic.

But Wawa brought his peak level to where it mattered the most.
 
#19
Some Federer fans try to potray as if Stan Wawrinka owns Novak ... Lol
Slam H2H - 3-3
Overall H2H 5-19.. ;)

If someone mentions Federer"s H2H in slams versus Djokodal ,you will bring up excuses ..

So if Slams are everything ,then why has Delpo beaten Federer and Nadal 4 times in slams , but Never won a Slam match against Djoker ??
Let the excuses begin .

What I want to say is if a Player peaks he can defeat any top ATG ,hence Delpo beat Fed and Nadal in slams and hence peak Wawrinka beat Djoker in slams ,Wawrinka also beat Rafa and Federer in slams irrespective of age ..
A peaking Cilic also beat Fed and Nadal in slams ,Kie beat Djoker ..
If an ATG is not great on a certain day ,and the Other player peaks He can win .
 
#22
This 5-19 arguments is dumb because it has more to do with consistency than peak level. No one has said Wawa can keep a high level on for as long as Djokovic.

But Wawa brought his peak level to where it mattered the most.
No it's not dumb, it's reality. I find the Wawrinka argument being thrown around, especially when Djokovic is complimented, rather dumb myself and pointless. Wawrinka is 2-14 against Djokovic in a BO3 and 3-5 against him in a BO5 so what exactly is in there where he should be laughing in comparison to Djokovic? Like I said, if he can replicate Djokovic's 2nd half of 2018 or make a comeback like that then we can talk. Posters who like to put Wawrinka on Djokovic's level need a reality check every now and then.
 
#25
Some Federer fans try to potray as if Stan Wawrinka owns Novak ... Lol
Slam H2H - 3-3
Overall H2H 5-19.. ;)

If someone mentions Federer"s H2H in slams versus Djokodal ,you will bring up excuses ..

So if Slams are everything ,then why has Delpo beaten Federer and Nadal 4 times in slams , but Never won a Slam match against Djoker ??
Let the excuses begin .

What I want to say is if a Player peaks he can defeat any top ATG ,hence Delpo beat Fed and Nadal in slams and hence peak Wawrinka beat Djoker in slams ,Wawrinka also beat Rafa and Federer in slams irrespective of age ..
A peaking Cilic also beat Fed and Nadal in slams ,Kie beat Djoker ..
If an ATG is not great on a certain day ,and the Other player peaks He can win .
Wawrinka denied Djokovic 3 slams in his very prime. Delpo didn't do the same to Fed. Flawed comparison.
 
#26
Some Federer fans try to potray as if Stan Wawrinka owns Novak ... Lol
Slam H2H - 3-3
Overall H2H 5-19.. ;)

If someone mentions Federer"s H2H in slams versus Djokodal ,you will bring up excuses ..

So if Slams are everything ,then why has Delpo beaten Federer and Nadal 4 times in slams , but Never won a Slam match against Djoker ??
Let the excuses begin .

What I want to say is if a Player peaks he can defeat any top ATG ,hence Delpo beat Fed and Nadal in slams and hence peak Wawrinka beat Djoker in slams ,Wawrinka also beat Rafa and Federer in slams irrespective of age ..
A peaking Cilic also beat Fed and Nadal in slams ,Kie beat Djoker ..
If an ATG is not great on a certain day ,and the Other player peaks He can win .
Correct but 4-3 in Slams for Nole.
 
#27
Have to ask. Roddick v Wawrinka. Who will you back?
Wawrinka easily.

Although as Earth's Mightiest fan I am a little irritated by the outcome of certain matches, I have rooted for Stan in some big matches as well. Most of my comments regarding him have been responses to all the love he gets from TTW and other places, which in my cynical opinion is more of a result of him denying Djokodal occasionally than being genuine support.

Now that I mentioned that, I really miss @Garhi Shot First. She's an awesome fan of his and tennis in general.
 
#28
Wawrinka easily.

Although as Earth's Mightiest fan I am a little irritated by the outcome of certain matches, I have rooted for Stan in some big matches as well. Most of my comments regarding him have been responses to all the love he gets from TTW and other places, which in my cynical opinion is more of a result of him denying Djokodal occasionally than being genuine support.

Now that I mentioned that, I really miss @Garhi Shot First. She's an awesome fan of his and tennis in general.
Agree.
 
#29
Wawrinka denied Djokovic 3 slams in his very prime. Delpo didn't do the same to Fed. Flawed comparison.
Delpo beat 28 year old Federer at US open .
Stan beat 28 year old Nole at French ,29 yr old Nole at US open ..
So 29 year old Novak is prime Novak but 28 year old Fed is Old federer ??

Also between age 27 -29 Federer lost to Delpo Soderling Berdych at Slams .
Between age 27 -29 Novak lost only to Nishikori and Stan at Slams . (Ignore loses to Big 3 ).. everyone can use circular logic to expose other players ,but it doesn't give any conclusion ...
 
#30
Delpo beat 28 year old Federer at US open .
Stan beat 28 year old Nole at French ,29 yr old Nole at US open ..
So 29 year old Novak is prime Novak but 28 year old Fed is Old federer ??

Also between age 27 -29 Federer lost to Delpo Soderling Berdych at Slams .
Between age 27 -29 Novak lost only to Nishikori and Stan at Slams . (Ignore loses to Big 3 ).. everyone can use circular logic to expose other players ,but it doesn't give any conclusion ...
Delpo denied prime Fed only one slam, not 3. Stan denied prime Novak 3 slams.

And 29 year old Fed isn't prime Fed, just like 23 year old Djokovic wasn't prime Djokovic.
 
#31
Beast mode Nole is no match for peak Wawrinka
What is peak Wawrinka ?
Beating Nole after playing Murray 2 days in a row ?
Beating injured elbow Nole ?

Wawrinka: “ I have to play my best tennis. I have to hope that Novak is not in his best form. "

Only time Wawrinka has beaten Djokovic fair and square was AO 2014. Similar to one they had previous year when Novak won against Stan in similar fashion.
The only reason Stan's wins are overhyped is bcs of Fed fans - they wanted Nole to lose so much in 2015 RG final, even Fed himself was watching it while being on football game.
 
#32
Delpo denied prime Fed only one slam, not 3. Stan denied prime Novak 3 slams.

And 29 year old Fed isn't prime Fed, just like 23 year old Djokovic wasn't prime Djokovic.
Well in my opinion ,prime or peak age is subjective ..
Only the player can know what's his prime/peak age ,not us random fans .

Who would have thought Stan will enter peak after age 29+ ?

In my opinion 23 yr old djoker was prime Djokovic ,but he didn't had the fitness before 2010 US open to complete wid Fedal ..
He improved his fitness diet and started fighting better...

And of course Stan took 3 slams from djoker ..but at the same time period Delpo Soderling n Berdych beat Federer in slams . noone talks about it ..
Even 31 yr old Nole beat delpo at Slam final who took out Nadal this year..
Its about matchups too..
 
#34
Well in my opinion ,prime or peak age is subjective ..
Only the player can know what's his prime/peak age ,not us random fans .

Who would have thought Stan will enter peak after age 29+ ?

In my opinion 23 yr old djoker was prime Djokovic ,but he didn't had the fitness before 2010 US open to complete wid Fedal ..
He improved his fitness diet and started fighting better...

And of course Stan took 3 slams from djoker ..but at the same time period Delpo Soderling n Berdych beat Federer in slams . noone talks about it ..
Even 31 yr old Nole beat delpo at Slam final who took out Nadal this year..
Its about matchups too..
It's not subjective. How a player performs objectively tells you whether he is prime or not. 2010 Fed played way too bad after AO to label him prime. Just like Djokovic played way too bad in 2010 to label him prime. Fitness has little to do with his 2010 performances since it wasn't Fedal who was stopping him in majors.

It would be silly to put 2010 Fed in the same category as 2014-2016 Djokovic.
 
Last edited:
#36
I don’t want to do anything better.
I’m just so happy it’s something I care about watching and that interest me.
Actually something to be thankful for.

If this was 50 years ago I wouldn’t probably be interested in tennis at all.
I just picture the posters in here behind their computers leering off all this stuff. And it’s not nice pictures I get in the head to say it mildly.
Like in the other place two of the biggest fighters of the sport lacking anticipation. Hello.

Nah, and I love to see all of Nadals haters in here on court w Rafa. Let’s see if they would tell any of the crap they say every day to his face.

Nadal you looked really weak in Doha
Hahahaha
Don’t think that poster ever seen Rafa play live.
Rafa and weak in the same sentence is not a possibility, hasn’t been a possibility since Rafa was 16 years old.
Same old ******** from this hypocrite when she does the exact same thing to Federer.
 
#39
What is peak Wawrinka ?
Beating Nole after playing Murray 2 days in a row ?
Beating injured elbow Nole ?

Wawrinka: “ I have to play my best tennis. I have to hope that Novak is not in his best form. "

Only time Wawrinka has beaten Djokovic fair and square was AO 2014. Similar to one they had previous year when Novak won against Stan in similar fashion.
The only reason Stan's wins are overhyped is bcs of Fed fans - they wanted Nole to lose so much in 2015 RG final, even Fed himself was watching it while being on football game.
What a joke you people are. Stan > Nole at the FO. Period.
 
#40
Delpo beat 28 year old Federer at US open .
Stan beat 28 year old Nole at French ,29 yr old Nole at US open ..
So 29 year old Novak is prime Novak but 28 year old Fed is Old federer ??

Also between age 27 -29 Federer lost to Delpo Soderling Berdych at Slams .
Between age 27 -29 Novak lost only to Nishikori and Stan at Slams . (Ignore loses to Big 3 ).. everyone can use circular logic to expose other players ,but it doesn't give any conclusion ...
He lost to Querrey at Wimbledon.
 
#46
Some Federer fans try to potray as if Stan Wawrinka owns Novak ... Lol
Slam H2H - 3-3
Overall H2H 5-19.. ;)

If someone mentions Federer"s H2H in slams versus Djokodal ,you will bring up excuses ..

So if Slams are everything ,then why has Delpo beaten Federer and Nadal 4 times in slams , but Never won a Slam match against Djoker ??
Let the excuses begin .

What I want to say is if a Player peaks he can defeat any top ATG ,hence Delpo beat Fed and Nadal in slams and hence peak Wawrinka beat Djoker in slams ,Wawrinka also beat Rafa and Federer in slams irrespective of age ..
A peaking Cilic also beat Fed and Nadal in slams ,Kie beat Djoker ..
If an ATG is not great on a certain day ,and the Other player peaks He can win .
Nobody said Stan owns Novak. That's what people interpret wrongly.

Stan is just a guy who has denied Novak a substantial amount of majors, but that doesn't mean he owns him.
 
Top