I mean, that’s the point of the thread
Well if one has to guess it will be Sinner at 2025 USO or later at a HC slam.I mean, that’s the point of the thread
Djokovic's name was not part of the OP. This was your moment to shine, and show its got nothing to do with Djokovic, but tennis as a whole, and you let it go, because lets be honest, Federer was made to look good in the OP, so why would you come into the thread and say - Hey, inflated numbers for Federer here.
You spoke immediately about Djokovic, which says everything. And we both know, if Federer had won the most slams, your account would be named a little different. Tell me your agenda, without telling me it, right?
Anyways, that's me done here.
As evidenced by the fact a 37 yo player with a busted knee made it to the final.
This proves nothing. Do not play dumb as Djokovic also made AO semifinals recently and won Olympics on clay.
He didn't reach the final, did he? He had to withdraw that year and got dismantled by Sinner last year when he wasn't even injured, and that's where he's at his best.
He reached final but his QF opponent was injured and played just 5 matches to final.
He was nowhere near his 2014 level and went deeper in the tournament. Look at the best players in recent years: Zverev? Did nothing on grass. Med? Did nothing. Ruud? Did nothing. Tsitsipas? Did nothing. Sinner? He has potential, but he's still trying to find his groove. The reason they were so unsuccessful isn't because they dealt with grass monsters, it's because they're not remotely as good on grass as they are on HC or clay. As of now, only Djoker and Raz are good on grass.
What you say is again completely wrong. Medvedev just last year beat world number 1 sinner in five sets. And pushed Raz as well.
He beat a sick Sinner who's yet to become a truly good grass player. And he only took a single set off Raz by the skin of his teeth, before Raz took the 3 remaining sets without much trouble.
His level of play at Wimbledon was higher in 2014.
Sinner was number 1 favorite to win the tournament. This is very easy to NOW come and be brave saying how he was sick. Sick nothing. He beat Sinner fair and square.
The same can be applied to posts on TTW…
Him holding his serve and breaking serve more easily against a much weaker field, without even having to play the SF, makes his level higher in 2022?
I never said anything about highest level ever, but ok. Him being better at Wimbledon at 19 than he was at 27 isn't that strange, considering we're talking about a lazy-ass player who never trained properly in his life and never took tennis seriously.
So what if it wasn't part of the OP. No law in expanding the discussion to the one who has gained the most from inflation era. Actually in the OP Nadal was made to look the best, and I am no Nadal fan. So no point in talking about Fed here, but rather to mention Djokovic as the surprising one who couldn't accomplish this feat in the weakest era of all time.Djokovic's name was not part of the OP. This was your moment to shine, and show its got nothing to do with Djokovic, but tennis as a whole, and you let it go, because lets be honest, Federer was made to look good in the OP, so why would you come into the thread and say - Hey, inflated numbers for Federer here.
You spoke immediately about Djokovic, which says everything. And we both know, if Federer had won the most slams, your account would be named a little different. Tell me your agenda, without telling me it, right?
Anyways, that's me done here.
This is completely BULL ****
I'm not pretending to be part of a group of super knowledgeable fans who understand the game better than everyone else, I just give my opinions. If you get your knickers in a twist over this, I'm not the problem. You're way too invested in this. It's not war, there's no line to hold.
Ok? But he beat better opponents later on in the tournament and won the whole thing for a 2nd year in a row winning in straights in the final? He's 21 years old and had an off match. When he's 24/25 I don't see him having as many issues.
