on this website H2H is all that matters.
I mean, nearly 1/2 of nadal vs. djoker matches have been on clay.. many matches also before djoker's prime.
What in the world are nadal fans going to do when he does take over this H2H.
I think they are going to give up
Actually this is the surface breakdown
Hardcourt 16 matches (Djokovic leads 11-5)
Clay 15 matches (nadal leads 12-3)
Grass 3 matches (Nadal leads 2-1)
They've played one more match on Hard than clay, but it's pretty even. Djokovic just hasn't used his hc superiority as effectively as Nadal has used his on clay. But you really can't argue Nadal has benefitted from playing too many matches on clay.
Now, from this point on maybe Djokovic can take the lead in H2H. But slams matter most
You do realise Federer has been severely past his prime since 2007, and Djokovic has played Nadal quite a few times between 2006-2010 when for the majority of the time he was playing like crap. 2011 Nadal was even better than 2010, Djokovic just came to life. Again, I believe Djokovic stopped Nadal from becomign the most successful player ever in slams.
Djokovic will surpass Nadal's h2h and slam count when both are done.
Fed was past his prime after 2007 but I wouldn't say severely. He got a bit worse, Nadal got a bit better, that tiny margin was enough for Nadal toedge matches like Wimby 2008 and AO 2009. Also Djokovic was not crap from 2006-2010. He was a very good player in 2007, 2008 and even parts of 2009 (years in which he beat Nadal several times on HC and scared the life out of him on clay in 2009) but he had an awful 2010 (half of 2009 was bad too) and then became an extremely good layer in 2011. But he was still good before that.
Bear in mind, I'm a big fan of Djokovic, and not a Nadal fan, but I have to be fair on this.