Like they've dominated court tennis?I think Padel will make it before pickleball. Honestly, all the Americans should hope that pickleball doesn't become an Olympic sport because that would result in a ton of Chinese table tennis players converting to the sport and dominating it.
Do you mean tennis or is "court tennis" a separate olympic sport I'm not aware of ? If you mean tennis I think that table tennis has a lot more in common with pickleball than it does with tennis, specifically the dimensions of a table are much closer to a pickleball court than to a tennis court. The top table tennis players in the world are phenomenal athletes, the top pickleball players in the world are decent athletes who for the most part are failed tennis players.Like they've dominated court tennis?
I think the concept there is that ping pong to pickleball is not a big leap whereas ping pong to tennis is.Like they've dominated court tennis?
Not sure that P'ball quite meets all the IOC requirements at this time. Even if it met the criteria of 75 countries & 4 continents in the very near future, the earliest that it might possibly be included as an Olympic sport is 2028 (Los Angeles). But it might be more likely that it qualifies for the 2032 OlympicsI don’t have an answer but probably check the iOC website to see if it’s on the agenda
Not so according to several sources. Currently there are more than 60 national organizations across the world in the International Federation of Pickleball. Last count I heard was more than 36 million players across the globe. Besides the US, Pb has taken off in Canada, India, Spain, UK, FranceYou guys do realise it is only played in the the US, and maybe Canada? Everywhere else it's Padel.
Padel Rackets - Tennis Warehouse Europe
www.tenniswarehouse-europe.com
I think the concept there is that ping pong to pickleball is not a big leap whereas ping pong to tennis is.
Do you mean tennis or is "court tennis" a separate olympic sport I'm not aware of ? If you mean tennis I think that table tennis has a lot more in common with pickleball than it does with tennis, specifically the dimensions of a table are much closer to a pickleball court than to a tennis court. The top table tennis players in the world are phenomenal athletes, the top pickleball players in the world are decent athletes who for the most part are failed tennis players.
Squash has been vying for Olympic inclusion since 1992 (if not earlier). I believe that there's been a significant push since 2012. Roger Federer, Andre Agassi, Kim Clijsters, Stefan Edberg & Andy Murray are some tennis players who've played and have given their support to including squash in the Olympicsonly after squash
Maybe it is a reaction to the reflex dinking of kitchen duels, which are extremely reminiscent, at least on the surface, of high level ping pong rallies.Not my experience. Started playing pickleball before the pandemic but overall have played maybe 2 dozen times.
OTOH, I've played ping pong, tennis & badminton for several decades. Pickleball combined elements of all 3 sports. I feel that my Tennis & Badm skills have transferred somewhat more than ping pong. The best players I've come across playing Pb are usually collegiate & pro tennis players.
Much more likely to hit dinks, net drops or touch shots in badminton. I'll hit dinks or drops shots in PP every once in a blue moon but I tend to use these in tennis a bit more (cuz of my competitive badm experience).Maybe it is a reaction to the reflex dinking of kitchen duels, which are extremely reminiscent, at least on the surface, of high level ping pong rallies.
I literally mean like the way a layperson sees PB players reaching out to get things at the kitchen and the noise they hear when contact is made feels the same as high level PP rallies do. It doesn't matter that the shotmaking is different because that is not the level of complexity it is being looked at.Much more likely to hit dinks, net drops or touch shots in badminton. I'll hit dinks or drops shots in PP every once in a blue moon but I tend to use these in tennis a bit more (cuz of my competitive badm experience).
Will use quite a bit of spin in tennis. Even moreso in ping pong. But considerably less in pickleball -- cuz Pb paddles are too slick to impart as much spin as a decent PP paddle does.
Tennis, badminton & pickleball incorporates volleys & overheads. PP does not allow volleys and overheads are extremely rare.
Huh?I literally mean like the way a layperson sees PB players reaching out to get things at the kitchen and the noise they hear when contact is made feels the same as high level PP rallies do. It doesn't matter that the shotmaking is different because that is not the level of complexity it is being looked at.
What part is confusing? I'm just telling you that you understand the space really well but other people don't so they look at it differently than you.Huh?
Look again. I updated that postWhat part is confusing? I'm just telling you that you understand the space really well but other people don't so they look at it differently than you.
If two things feel the same on the surface and that is how you equate them it is natural to think they'll transfer.Look again
Thinly guised is being generous.Since the Olympics is simply a thinly guised outlet for nationalism that mostly sheds light on sports people don't regularly care much about, seems like a good fit ?
What day is hell expected to freeze over?
Don't see P'ball ever becoming an Olympic sport. I would rather see a higher-skill racket sport, like Squash or Padel, make it to the Olympics
Much more likely to hit dinks, net drops or touch shots in badminton. I'll hit dinks or drops shots in PP every once in a blue moon but I tend to use these in tennis a bit more (cuz of my competitive badm experience).
Will use quite a bit of spin in tennis. Even moreso in ping pong. But considerably less in pickleball -- cuz Pb paddles are too slick to impart as much spin as a decent PP paddle does.
Tennis, badminton & pickleball incorporates volleys & overheads. PP does not allow volleys and overheads are extremely rare.
Yeah this must be why the impression is left then, what stands out by far the most when watching higher level pickleball is the kitchen dueling. It seems, as you say, as if the entire game is oriented around that.Only in one area does the ping pong analogy hold … it just happens to be the thing that decides wins and losses in good intermediate pball and up … the kitchen. Even though the court dimensions have been shrunk from tennis … there is still tennis like movement from baseline including hitting baseline strokes and moving up to kitchen. There is no ping pong from pball baseline … other than I have seen intermediate hit good enough ping shot adjacent baseline shots (no torso rotation … arming punch shots like ping pong). You can play a very good level of pball and never hit a tennis stroke with torso rotation because the baseline isn’t even close to the important key doubles skills (everything kitchen).
So imo … ping analogy in pball is valid at the kitchen because most of the play at the kitchen is played hitting the ball with torso square to the net. In the tennis forum we call this arming the body without body/torso rotation … not to mention all kinds of hideous kinetic chain violations.I guess you could make the case that dinking is analogous to ping pong … but to me if you want to visualize ping pong just watch backhand volleys at at the kitchen. Watch two opponents in a firefight hitting backhand volleys
Yeah this must be why the impression is left then, what stands out by far the most when watching higher level pickleball is the kitchen dueling. It seems, as you say, as if the entire game is oriented around that.
It is still boring to watchYou can win at highest levels of pro pickleball singles with less kitchen/dink play … but even there a Ben Johns can force his opponents into kitchen dink play. But in pro doubles … in current state of the game … doubles is won by team that controls the kitchen (dinking and speed ups after much patience). Watch multiple Ben and Collin Johns doubles finals … opponents seldom beat their kitchen defense/control with kitchen offense. IMO pickleball is a way more tilted to defense than tennis.
A good 3.5 match where they haven’t perfected the kitchen dink game can be more enjoyable to watch than pro doubles. As rec players improve … often the matches look more boring (opposite of tennis). I think that’s why it’s hard to watch matches and judge level. We all know in tennis what someone looks like warming up in tennis often has little to do with who wins. In pickleball multiply that by 10. You can watch men’s rec 5.0 gold doubles matches from last pball US Open, and someone that doesn’t play would not know how to judge. Levels are decided by small margins at the kitchen … a dink one foot to high or long gets smashed. Many of those 5.0 matches will not look like what we are used to watching 5.0 tennis. But … if you know what you are watching for … you watch for how many mistakes are made leaving the ball up slightly to high for opponent smash … say in an hours play. Some of that visually slow boring looking play of 4.5/5.0 rec play is amazingly low kitchen error play. You don’t realize how hard the kitchen dinking game is until you play. I thought it would be frickin easy after tennis. And it is … if you are talking 5 in a row … without net clearance mistakes measured in inches against good teams. Personally … even after an enjoyable six months of pickleball, I think pickleball doubles would become more enjoyable if the baseline skills counted for more than they do now. Kitchen 9 … Baseline 1.
Wrong forum.
There's a pickleball forum where you can make this and any other questions about this intruder passtime which is parasitizing the sport which this forum is about.
Reported this time. Next time I will propose a permanent ban on you.
Please, feel free of discussing all matters related to PB in that forum. Why deprive yourself of the integral experience?chill … we mainly talk about paddles in that forum that shall not be named.
It is still boring to watch
Please, feel free of discussing all matters related to PB in that forum. Why deprive yourselves of the integral experience?
I heard from a competitive pickleball player that a good paddle costs between $250-$350. That's fine, about the same as a good racket these days and you don't have to restring....but then he told me the paddle will only last 2-3 months before becoming "de-laminated" and illegal to use in tournament play. If that's true then that's possibly the stupiest thing yet about pickleball.
I heard from a competitive pickleball player that a good paddle costs between $250-$350. That's fine, about the same as a good racket these days and you don't have to restring....but then he told me the paddle will only last 2-3 months before becoming "de-laminated" and illegal to use in tournament play. If that's true then that's possibly the stupiest thing yet about pickleball.
I would only wish to clarify that when I enjoy my precious vintages, the last thing I think of is pickleball. It ruins my Malbec.I can’t give you more information here or my brother Sud goes into a viscous spiral (hate pickleball spasms -> profess hatred -> drinking -> hate pickleball spasms -> profess hatred -> drinking).
I love my brother Sud … so I can’t say the following:![]()
- big deal $$$ for pro pballers to get a paddle sponsor … not making tennis $$$
- only bigger paddle manufacturers can afford to sponsor many pro players
- rec market buys what pros play with
- small number of big paddle companies allowed premium pricing
- flood of top quality lower priced ($90-$170) have hit the market in last six months
- at the front end of rapid paddle evolution … paddle might become obsolete before it wears out
The recent carbon faces were a big evolution (in context of paddles) … allowed additional spin and control. The problem has been the carbon faces (actually resin layer over carbon cloth) wears down over time … lose that new paddle smell (spin). Also … another problem has been some of the popular gen 1 expensive paddles (Joola) were known to snap at the handle. Since no one is providing me a free paddle
… seems like the smarter choice is a quality $100 paddle that might have to be replaced every 6 months (either wear or better new paddle tech), than any more expensive paddle with marginal difference (if any) regardless of warranty length.
Wow … extra information you did not want, that Sud did not want me to discuss … all posted in the wrong forum … ttw trifecta.
For my bro @Sudacafan
how I picture Sud:
I would only wish to clarify that when I enjoy my precious vintages, the last thing I think of is pickleball. It ruins my Malbec.
You don't need to get a full set of new clubs every year, you know...Also … compared to golf I no longer play … I could buy an expensive paddle once a month and still be cheaper than golf (the true evil … not pickleball).
You don't need to get a full set of new clubs every year, you know...
Oh yeah belonging to a club changes the cost paradigm. But it's not as if there aren't tennis and pickleball clubs...That was never my golf problem … it was golf club monthly Selkirk $$$ bill. I only remember changing my full set of clubs once ... but of course everyone has to change out their putter and driver on occasion (it’s a rule).
Oh yeah belonging to a club changes the cost paradigm. But it's not as if there aren't tennis and pickleball clubs...
I have actually never changed my putter. It is a proper antique (late 60s Ping, when Karsten Solheim was at the peak of his creative majesty with the flat sticks) so I've never seen any real reason to. Maybe the "I should have variety" will hit at some point but when most other people are using modern putters there is a real ego boost to playing something 50 years old.
I have plenty of years yet for the doubt to seep into my mind...never changed putters … wow … that’s Roy McAvoy level respect![]()