Which 10 non-point play strokes would you pick to guess a rec player's singles level?

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
Edit: Sorry, don't think I was clear enough in my title and OP. I am basically asking if you can feed a player you don't know 10 balls, or he/she can drop feed to themselves ... or hit serves ... what 10 shots would you have them hit. Think single shot ... not repetitive feeds where you could observe change of direction.

Talking singles, not doubles, and rec level (say 5.0 and lower).

Anyone who has played competitive singles knows you only really know a player's level by playing them ... or are at least watching them play a competitive match. But for this hypothetical, if you could only see a player that you have never seen or heard of before hit 10 strokes/shots to guess their level, what would you pick?

Note: let's call feeds, drop feeds, ball machine, etc all equal for this.

I will go first, here are my 10:

Setup: I have six cones, two in corners 3ft in from baseline and 3ft in from sideline, and one in each corner of both service boxes (also 3 ft in from service line and sideline).

First 3: I have player setup on baseline half way between the sideline and the center hash mark. I tell them I will feed the ball approx 3 ft inside the sideline, and they should hit their best controlled fh dtl trying to hit the cone in the fh corner near the baseline.

On 4th, I have them stand at center hash mark, and tell them to now hit their max fh pace dtl they would hit in a match at the cone near the baseline.

For 5,6,7,8 .... rinse and repeat with bh dtl.

Ball 9: have player hit their second serve to deuce court to either cone they feel best about hitting.

Ball 10: same on ad court ... their choice, 2nd serve pace.


OK ... here is my thinking on those choices.

The first 3 fh dtl and 3 bh dtl is a measure of control on the move. If they can hit decent on the move, have to assume they can hit good stationary (opposite not true). I will look at the worse miss of the 3.

The 4th and 8th will give me a clue about speed/court coverage and max pace they are likely to hit in a match. Also ... since I didn't tell them to hit flat or topspin, a clue about their swing preference (flat, ts).

We are only as good as our 2nd serve, so I let them pick their preference in each service box and show me their 2nd serve.

Final thoughts:

I would love to see their first serve, their volley, their overhead, etc ... but I'm picking my most informative 10 shots (that isn't many). If they can hit a decent 2nd serve, they will have a proficient 1st serve ... and most rec players aren't winning by blasting the 1st serve. The serve motion will also be a good indicator of overhead competency ... rare to see a good server not also have a good overhead.

Volleys ... would have included it if doubles, but with singles if they suck at volleys they aren't coming in anyway.

Edit: dtl groundstrokes will give me some guess about ros ... and assume if they can hit dtl they can hit cc. Would have liked to see cc, but the pattern of 3 balls to same target more important to me. Also ... I didn't tell them flat, topspin or slice on all ground strokes ... so if their best bh dtl control shot is a slice, that is what they will hit. (I guess I should tell them on the first three ... hit your best control stroke).


That's my 10 .... which would you guys pick?
 
Last edited:

atp2015

Hall of Fame
just find answer to one question to guess their level -

Question: When do you hit DTL? If the answer is like never, he is high level rec. If the answer is 'whenever the ball is short', he is a show boat and will miss it when the score is 30-40 serving at 4-4 and assume he is lower than his true potential.
 
Last edited:

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
just need 3 strokes/shots and answer to one question to guess their level -

CC forehand from baseline- can he hit deep CC forehand 3 in a row?
CC backhand - can he hit deep CC backhand 3 in a row?
1 serve each assuming the score is 30-30 and 30-40.
Question: When do you hit DTL? If the answer is like never, he is high level rec. If the answer is 'whenever the ball is short', he is a show boat and will miss it when the score is 30-40 serving at 4-4 and assume he is lower than his true potential.

It's based on my experience. The guys who beat me, when they see a short ball, they come up and rip another short angle FH which is high percentage - make 5 out of 5. The guys who I beat, try for a DTL winner - make 3 and miss 2. That's enough for a break.

You wasted 7 strokes and hypothetical wasn't a quiz for player? :p

Edit: I have hit dtl constantly in singles ... one of the reasons I was successful in singles tournaments.
 

Harry_Wild

G.O.A.T.
See how they play against Novak Djokovic! If they can get a game in two set match, at least 5.5 level. If they can get two or more games, at least 6.5. If they can get 4 games or more, probably 7.0 level! Djokovic got to be motivated too. Make sure match is videoed and tell him it go be posted on YouTube! LOL!
 
Last edited:

Dartagnan64

G.O.A.T.
I just need to see the second serve. As the saying goes, “you are only as good as your second serve”.

3.0 - patty cake slowed up version of the first serve
3.5 - slice or topspin slow roller
4.0 - slow kick serve
4.5 - fast kick serve
5.0 - fast kick serve placed to corners
 

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
I just need to see the second serve. As the saying goes, “you are only as good as your second serve”.

3.0 - patty cake slowed up version of the first serve
3.5 - slice or topspin slow roller
4.0 - slow kick serve
4.5 - fast kick serve
5.0 - fast kick serve placed to corners

You would love watching the firefighters doubles at my park. 100 mph frying pan 1st serve ... 5 mph pooch 2nd.
 

IowaGuy

Hall of Fame
I just look at their shoes.

Momma always says there's an awful lot you could tell about a person by their shoes.

She's one step ahead of you :)

hingis02.jpg
 

S&V-not_dead_yet

Talk Tennis Guru
I just need to see the second serve. As the saying goes, “you are only as good as your second serve”.

3.0 - patty cake slowed up version of the first serve
3.5 - slice or topspin slow roller
4.0 - slow kick serve
4.5 - fast kick serve
5.0 - fast kick serve placed to corners

Then you'd be wrong about certain people. My friend, Mr. Grinder, has a 3.0 serve, an ugly looking BH, and not much of a net game. But he has a wicked FH and great mobility. Easily a 4.0 if not 4.5.

Then, on the opposite end of the spectrum, is Mr. Big, who has a 5.0-level 2nd serve...when it goes in.

If you have 9 other strokes to view, why limit yourself to just 1?
 

ChaelAZ

G.O.A.T.
With or without a racket?
.How are you going to see positioning with 10 non-point shots? Hardly matters anyway if they hit 50% out with grade A goat hopping. :p

I can watch them warm-up or train and get a feel for their play level. There are a lot of telling signs in movement and a distinct difference between lower players and trained players. And no, they don't even need a racquet.
 

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
I can watch them warm-up or train and get a feel for their play level. There are a lot of telling signs in movement and a distinct difference between lower players and trained players. And no, they don't even need a racquet.

Sorry, don't think I was clear enough in my title and OP. I am basically asking if you can feed a player you don't know 10 balls, or he/she can drop feed to themselves ... or hit serves ... what 10 shots would you have them hit. Think single shot ... not repetitive feeds where you could observe change of direction.

I just thought it would be a good "thought" experiment ... not so far. :p

Edit: I added more explanation in OP .... 8-B(y)
 
Last edited:

ChaelAZ

G.O.A.T.
Sorry, don't think I was clear enough in my title and OP. I am basically asking if you can feed a player you don't know 10 balls, or he/she can drop feed to themselves ... or hit serves ... what 10 shots would you have them hit. Think single shot ... not repetitive feeds where you could observe change of direction.

I just thought it would be a good "thought" experiment ... not so far. :p


I get ya. I am saying I could setup 10 different footwork/setup stations or exercises, have them run throug, and get a feel for their level more than 10 different shots would tell me about them, as far as match play is concerned and level.

If I see anyone being able to move very well, have proper corss-over steps, split steps, and shadow swings in drills or exercises I pretty much think 4.0+ match ability. I have seen plenty of great strokes that equate to a much lower match play level on court, including my own.

Just my .02.


If you saw this, what level would you assume the players are? Bit of an extreme example, but hopefully tis aligns my point.



Anyway, if I had to see a stroke I guess I would say serve.
 

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
I get ya. I am saying I could setup 10 different footwork/setup stations or exercises, have them run throug, and get a feel for their level more than 10 different shots would tell me about them, as far as match play is concerned and level.

If I see anyone being able to move very well, have proper corss-over steps, split steps, and shadow swings in drills or exercises I pretty much think 4.0+ match ability. I have seen plenty of great strokes that equate to a much lower match play level on court, including my own.

Just my .02.


If you saw this, what level would you assume the players are? Bit of an extreme example, but hopefully tis aligns my point.



Anyway, if I had to see a stroke I guess I would say serve.

Yeah ... we are thinking completely different player levels. I'm just thinking in terms of my rec adult peers 4.0-5.0, from 20s through now. We had very talented overweight middle age guys that could beat the hockey out of any 4.0 and never match any of this ttw footwork standard. And even though most had moved to mostly doubles, I've seen a couple of our heavier talented players (had played some college tennis way back when) beat some singles players that had better strokes and movement. I would have a different standard for jr or headed to D1 screening, by then they can all hit where they want without UE. But give me a 45 year old 4.0 ... I want to see if they can hit where they are aiming while moving, because this was guessing at singles ability. How many times have we seen someone post a video here hitting stationary and they look great, and then watch them hit moving even a little, and NOT GOOD. Hit where they are aiming on the move ... and get some guess (that is all this is) of consistency. The guys that win rec 4.0-4.5 singles don't miss much ... rarely the prettiest (or full) stroke ... and they have great balance and efficient movement, but most would not pass the ttw split step test.

Anyway ... this was not intended to be a "footwork" screening or test ... just a "if I could see you hit 10 shots to guess your level, what would they be".
 

NLBwell

Legend
1 - first serve deuce side
2 - second serve deuce side
3 - first serve ad side
4 - second serve ad side
(really don't need deuce and ad side, would just want to see the serve from more than one angle)
5 - overhead (or not) off deep lob
6 - show me their forehand motion without the ball or a racket
7 - show me their backhand motion without the ball or a racket

that's all I'd need
 

J011yroger

Talk Tennis Guru
1 - first serve deuce side
2 - second serve deuce side
3 - first serve ad side
4 - second serve ad side
(really don't need deuce and ad side, would just want to see the serve from more than one angle)
5 - overhead (or not) off deep lob
6 - show me their forehand motion without the ball or a racket
7 - show me their backhand motion without the ball or a racket

that's all I'd need

My backhand shadow swing is a thing of beauty.

In a match it looks like something you scraped off the bottom of your shoe.

J
 

NLBwell

Legend
My backhand shadow swing is a thing of beauty.

In a match it looks like something you scraped off the bottom of your shoe.

J
Well, with one or two easy ball feeds, I wouldn't be able to tell too much - I wouldn't be able to tell what's going on when you are pressured by a shot in a match, for example. Forcing the student to do a shadow swing lets me at least be aware of if they understand the stroke and if they understand what they are trying to get their body to do.
 

2good4U

Professional
Just watch them do some serious hitting.

IF you need more than that, it's you not them.
(your lack of perceptiveness)
 

Bender

G.O.A.T.
I just look at their shoes.

Momma always says there's an awful lot you could tell about a person by their shoes.

J
This is true

Eg if a player wears Vapor X and plays with a 1HBH, he is either a 3.0 or 5.0+

Granted I'm guilty of buying tennis gear as well, but I wear Cages so my ceiling is probably 4.5
So we can add limited reading skills to your ... uh ... trouble making. 8-B
> doesn't read the question
> accuses you of lacking perceptiveness
> rip in peace my sides
 

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
My backhand shadow swing is a thing of beauty.

In a match it looks like something you scraped off the bottom of your shoe.

J

Worked the opposite for me ... an endless list of tournament opponents brimming with confidence after warm up ... shaking their head as I left with the balls. I think tennis is unfair when the prettiest strokes don't win ... they obviously put a lot of time into them.
 
Last edited:

Bender

G.O.A.T.
Worked the opposite for me ... an endlist list of tournament opponents brimming with confidence after warm up ... shaking their head as I left with the balls. I think tennis is unfair when the prettiest strokes don't win ... they obviously put a lot of time into them.
I make my strokes look pretty in case I have a stalker who takes photos of me when I'm playing. If I have to testify in court I want to make sure the jury has flattering shots of my forehand.
 

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
This is true

Eg if a player wears Vapor X and plays with a 1HBH, he is either a 3.0 or 5.0+

Granted I'm guilty of buying tennis gear as well, but I wear Cages so my ceiling is probably 4.5

> doesn't read the question
> accuses you of lacking perceptiveness
> rip in peace my sides

@2good4U is a provocateur ... a provocateur with limited reading skills. I would like to hit with him somewhere with a lot of traffic noise. :p
 

ByeByePoly

G.O.A.T.
I make my strokes look pretty in case I have a stalker who takes photos of me when I'm playing. If I have to testify in court I want to make sure the jury has flattering shots of my forehand.

Even if my strokes became pretty ... still playing in Kirkland white shoes and a sweat gutter.

I'm like the new Sam Adams Superbowl beer promotion:

Too Old, Too Slow, Still Here

Can you hurry up and finish that school stuff ... you are the only young guy here that speaks BBP.
 

onehandbh

G.O.A.T.
I would probably just feed the first 7-8 balls more or less continuously and tell them to hit each ball crosscourt.
1st one to the left or right. 2nd one in the opposite direction. Mix in a shorter ball, then deeper one to make them back up. Then a dropshot and then a high lob.

Then hit two a 2nd serve to deuce middle and ad backhand.

Last shot. Choice of either attempting to hit a baseline dropshot that spins back over the net or attempt a tweener off a topspin lob.
 

Dartagnan64

G.O.A.T.
Then you'd be wrong about certain people. My friend, Mr. Grinder, has a 3.0 serve, an ugly looking BH, and not much of a net game. But he has a wicked FH and great mobility. Easily a 4.0 if not 4.5.

Then, on the opposite end of the spectrum, is Mr. Big, who has a 5.0-level 2nd serve...when it goes in.

If you have 9 other strokes to view, why limit yourself to just 1?

Oh I'm sure there are snowflakes out there. But my second serve rule holds for about 90% of the population. If I needed a second stroke to determine your level it would be the BH:
3.0 - lob
3.5 - flat 2HBH or floaty slice 1HBH
4.0 - Modest topspin 2HBH or low bouncing slice 1HBH
4.5 - good topspin 2HBH or mix of slice/topspin 1HBH
5.0 - Solid driving 2HBH or 1HBH, uses slice well as change of pace or approaches
 
Top