Which racquet lines have the most slams?

Dunlop 200 line (mac, steffi, and more) would be my guess.
prestige, pro staff, and radical probably also up there.
 
Id say single Grandslams in the modern era? Rafa's Aero no doubt.


Djokovic never really used a retail line under the paint (don't say liquid metal radical) and his string pattern and therefore "frame" changed cutting his GS numbers below Rafa's tried and true 22 grand slams
 
Id say single Grandslams in the modern era? Rafa's Aero no doubt.


Djokovic never really used a retail line under the paint (don't say liquid metal radical) and his string pattern and therefore "frame" changed cutting his GS numbers below Rafa's tried and true 22 grand slams
Who beside Rafa and wozniaki won slam with aero?
 
The Pro Staff was used by Federer, Sampras, Courier, Edberg, Graff, Evert. That's like ~70 singles slams just from them? Wilson's website counts 117, but they are probably including doubles.

Unless there was another line that was used for 30 years by multiple players at one point in the GOAT conversation, that's gotta take the crown.
 
Last edited:
Id say single Grandslams in the modern era? Rafa's Aero no doubt.


Djokovic never really used a retail line under the paint (don't say liquid metal radical) and his string pattern and therefore "frame" changed cutting his GS numbers below Rafa's tried and true 22 grand slams
Radical line has at least 40+ slams, as asked in the OP - the line of rackets — ND based on LM Radical, Cilic, AA, Murray, Guga…all types of radicals…

If the question was specific mode, not line of rackets, then probably Aero.
 
Radical line has at least 40+ slams, as asked in the OP - the line of rackets — ND based on LM Radical, Cilic, AA, Murray, Guga…all types of radicals…

If the question was specific mode, not line of rackets, then probably Aero.
Do we count murray? I know PT57A is based off of the original radical mold but it was always a different line, no? But I do think Radical is up there for sure. May be the highest.
 
29 Mens singles titles alone between Djokovic and AA for the radical alone. and that's just singles. Will do some research to see who else.
 
The Pro Staff was used by Federer, Sampras, Courier, Edberg, Graff, Evert. That's like ~70 singles slams just from them? Wilson's website counts 117, but they are probably including doubles.

Unless there was another line that was used for 30 years by multiple players at one point in the GOAT conversation, that's gotta take the crown.
Shame they're now trying to axe the pro staff... without a doubt one of the most legendary racket lines in tennis history.
 
Radical line has at least 40+ slams, as asked in the OP - the line of rackets — ND based on LM Radical, Cilic, AA, Murray, Guga…all types of radicals…

If the question was specific mode, not line of rackets, then probably Aero.
Hi dr325i- why Guga Radical? Wasn't it a PT 630?
 
You had the Jack Kramer Pro Staff (came out in 1970) and the Chris Evert Pro Staff (that was released in 1982). The Pro Staff Midsize had nothing to do to do with those wood rackets
i think mac won one or two with the pro staff didn’t he? or was it all dunlop?
 
I know it's beside the point, but I just felt it was interesting enough to share.

big_panther_07.png
 
i think mac won one or two with the pro staff didn’t he? or was it all dunlop?
McEnroe won the 1979 and 1980 US Open with the JACK KRAMER Pro Staff which is a mono shaft wood racket. The only racket that just said Pro Staff was the graphite and Kevlar racket that Pete Sampras, Stefan Edberg, Jim Courier made famous and John never used that frame.
 
McEnroe won the 1979 and 1980 US Open with the JACK KRAMER Pro Staff which is a mono shaft wood racket. The only racket that just said Pro Staff was the graphite and Kevlar racket that Pete Sampras, Stefan Edberg, Jim Courier made famous and John never used that frame.
yeah i meant the wood one. i’d still count it as part of the pro staff line personally.
 
Many racquet lines really bear no resemblance to their predecessors apart from name. It seems a bit ridiculous to claim they are the same thing in any way apart from just being a tennis racquet.
 
Many racquet lines really bear no resemblance to their predecessors apart from name. It seems a bit ridiculous to claim they are the same thing in any way apart from just being a tennis racquet.
All racquet lines evolve over time. this is not a thread of which specific mold has the most titles over time. as that would be boring. max 200g, tk57, or pro staff 85 would maybe win that though if i had to guess.
 
Yes and that's why I think the name shouldn't carry on past a certain point. It becomes meaningless.
names carry brand recognition. they carry on for a reason. if companies gave a new name for every new mold that came out it would be one of the stupidest business decisions they could make.
 
yeah i meant the wood one. i’d still count it as part of the pro staff line personally.
I wouldn’t and it isn’t. It was part of the Jack Kramer line of rackets. There was also Chris Evert Pro Staff that was part of the Chris Evert line. You’re confused.
 
I wouldn’t and it isn’t. It was part of the Jack Kramer line. There was also Chris Evert Pro Staff that was part of the Chris Evert line. You’re confused.
I’m not confused, i mean it still has the pro staff moniker, but that’s totally fair that one wouldn’t.
 
I’m not confused, i mean it still has the pro staff moniker, but that’s totally fair that one wouldn’t.
It was the Jack Kramer Pro Staff and had nothing to do with a graphite midsize racket. The Jack Kramer Pro Staff along with the Jack Kramer Autograph, Jack Kramer Autograph Midsize were part of the same line of wood racket endorsed by Jack Kramer. It was part of his line of rackets. You’re confused.
 
It was the Jack Kramer Pro Staff and had nothing to do with a graphite midsize racket. The Jack Kramer Pro Staff along with the Jack Kramer Autograph, Jack Kramer Autograph Midsize were part of the same line of wood racket endorsed by Jack Kramer. It was part of his line of rackets. You’re confused.
i totally get it. but i’d lean loose and if it has pro staff in the name i’ll add it to the tally. you’re not wrong. PS97 and the PS6.1 are unbelievably different for graphite racquets as well.
 
i totally get it. but i’d lean loose and if it has pro staff in the name i’ll add it to the tally. you’re not wrong. PS97 and the PS6.1 are unbelievably different for graphite racquets as well.
Better add Chris Evert Pro Staff to the list.
And the Pro Staff 6.1 95 and Pro Staff are evolutions on the them of graphite and Kevlar composite frames inspired by the original Pro Staff Midsize graphite and Kevlar. The wood rackets aren’t even loose.
 
Last edited:
Better add Chris Evert Pro Staff to the list.
And the Pro Staff 6.1 95 and Pro Staff are evolutions on the them of graphite and Kevlar composite frames inspired by the original Pro Staff Midsize graphite and Kevlar. The wood rackets aren’t even loose.
i don’t disagree about the frames not being close. i’m willing to bend the rules because, (although there really are no rules for this lol) they just all have the words “pro staff” in their name.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top