Which statement is more absurd? part 2 series - for tennis and Star Wars fans

Which statement is more absurd?

  • Djokovic is a better player today than he was in 2011

    Votes: 6 12.5%
  • The Rise of Skywalker is the greatest Star Wars movie of all time

    Votes: 26 54.2%
  • Both are equally absurd

    Votes: 11 22.9%
  • Neither is absurd

    Votes: 5 10.4%

  • Total voters
    48
Seeing the whole Star wars community pick apart everything that came after the originals is so funny to me lol. As if the originals are actually that good :X3: again..... They all suck lol, everyone critiquing to death a story that never made sense in the first place
 
Seeing the whole Star wars community pick apart everything that came after the originals is so funny to me lol. As if the originals are actually that good :X3: again..... They all suck lol, everyone critiquing to death a story that never made sense in the first place
I don't think the illusory truth effect can work with something as popular as Star Wars.
 
TLJ is easily the best of the bunch. What still makes me laugh are the Star Wars fanboys whining about that movie, it never gets old
I stand by my judgment of TLJ as a non sequitur.

Probably the best standalone film among the sequels, but at the same time the one that did the worst job as a Star Wars main saga entry.

TFA = all setup little payoff, cookie cutter plot
TLJ = AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
ROS = picking up the pieces and failing horribly, a total mess
 
Last edited:
I stand but my judgment of TLJ as a non sequitur.

Probably the best standalone film among the sequels, but at the same time the one that did the worst job as a Star Wars main saga entry.

TFA = all setup little payoff, cookie cutter plot
TLJ = AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
ROS = picking up the pieces and failing horribly, a total mess
It's the best in terms of directing, but in terms of writing, I find it much worse than TFA. And the writing is what I value the most in a story (not that TFA's writing is good).

7 > 8 > 9 imo.
 
TFA has a good first act, a very messy second act (starting with Han's appearance) and a formulaic/mediocre third act.

I can only give good marks for the first third or so of the movie.
 
I stand by my judgment of TLJ as a non sequitur.

Probably the best standalone film among the sequels, but at the same time the one that did the worst job as a Star Wars main saga entry.

TFA = all setup little payoff, cookie cutter plot
TLJ = AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
ROS = picking up the pieces and failing horribly, a total mess
Nah, TLJ was sheet even if we ignore the terrible characterisation of Luke which cements it as the worst "Star Wars" film.

- The whole premises e.g . the chase is just nonsensical.
- Canto Bight is boring af and terrible
- Rose is an awful and poorly written character, with the saving what we love line standing out as truly terrible
- The whole saga with Haldo and Poe was so forced and contrived.

These are massive parts of the film and they're all terrible.

Rise of Skywalker is a worse movie for sure but TLJ is bad too. The Force Awakens is basically just a worse version of ANH, which still makes it better than the other two imo.
 
TLJ isn’t a terrible movie on its own. I enjoyed it the first viewing, but a few of its flaws stuck out to me more on subsequent ones.
 
I would agree with the majority that the statement about Star Wars is more absurd.
Even though 2011 Djokovic is far better than 2023 Djokovic in terms of athleticism, endurance and backhand, at least 2023 Djokovic improved his serve and net game, and his forehand has even more pace compared to in 2011.

On the other hand, The Rise of Skywalker is significantly worse than any of the Original Trilogy films in every conceivable way, it's not even remotely close. Nothing about TROS stands out to me, except for maybe the visuals (which hardly matters in this context).
TROS vs the OT would be more like 2011 Djokovic vs USTA 4.0 player. Or, to make a Star-Wars-style analogy, it would be like Abeloth vs Reva Sevander, i.e. a totally effortless, one-sided annihilation. Whereas 2011 Djokovic vs 2023 Djokovic would be much closer, like Darth Vader vs Luke in Empire Strikes Back lol.
 
3 and 5 are the only movies that are actually great

3 aka 2005's Revenge of the Sith only was a slightly softer piece of feces than its Prequel predecessors, but the entire Anakin arc was so irritating that Kenobi cutting Entitled Space Zoomer into pieces felt more like the defeat of a deserving a-hole / villain than that of Maul, Dooku, or Grievous. Anakin was not sympathetic at all, so the "fallen hero" narrative Lucas said was the journey we would see in Anakin, never unfolded. That, and John Williams was just phoning in his scores at that point--completely uninspired.

That is the curse of the innovators—what was fresh and new back then, now seems commonplace.

4 remains a great film without considering any of the sequels and spinoffs. In 1977, Lucas has no idea or belief that Star Wars would even be successful or lead to other film entries, so it was produced as a one-and-done, which is why it has the most complete narrative of any Star Wars movie.
 
Last edited:
One thing I will say is that I think The Last Jedi was probably the worst “2nd film in a trilogy” I can ever remember, because it backed Rise of Skywalker onto a corner from the very start. At the end of The Last Jedi it had:

  • A Mary Sue main character who was already powerful and had 0 room for character or skill development
  • Killed off the “Big Bad”, leaving us with a manchild (whom the hero had already defeated twice) as the only threat left
  • Killed off the main legacy character who older fans were invested in
  • 0 established subplot for romance, enmity or whatever between the 3 hero leads
  • Retconning of all the stuff from film 1 about Maz whatsherface, Rey’s parents, Luke’s sabre etc
Like how do you make a 3rd film after that? So they had to bring back Palpo and the rest is history

This is not to excuse what happened in ROS ofc because most of it was terrible regardless of the above
 
3 aka 2005's Revenge of the Sith only was a slightly softer piece of feces than its Prequel predecessors, but the entire Anakin arc was so irritating that Kenobi cutting Entitled Space Zoomer into pieces felt more like the defeat of adeserving ******* / villain thanthat of Maul, Dooku, or Grievous. Anakin was not sympathetic at all, so the "fallen hero" narrative Lucas said was the journey we would see in Anakin, never unfolded. That, and John Williams was just phoning in his scores at that point--completely uninspired.



4 remains a great film without considering any of the sequels and spinoffs. In 1977, Lucas has no idea or belief that Star Wars would even be successful or lead to other film entries, so it was produced as a one-and-done, which is why it has the most complete narrative of any Star Wars movie.
Totally disagree, episode 3 had a lot of great themes: Battle of the Heroes, Padme's Ruminations, Anakin's Betrayal, Anakin's Dark Deeds, etc. That was still peak SW in terms of scores, only the sequel's scores were very uninspired.

I never sympathized with Anakin either. Except when he was a kid in Episode 1, I never felt like he was a good guy. He looked like a selfish, childish, entitled and whiny brat. I felt like I was watching a teenager in his goth phase rebelling against his parents. And Christensen's acting really didn't help, he was a terrible actor.
 
The voice of reason!

Except for the saved in the edit video. That's just the ramblings of a YouTuber who doesn't know what an assembly edit it.
There’s a great rebuttal of that silly ‘Star wars was saved in the edit’ myth on YouTube now, highly encourage watching.
-edit someone already posted it lol.
 
Last edited:
TLJ isn't even that different, it's just bits of TESB, bits of ROTJ, bits of the Mortis arc from The Clone Wars, and a few tired movie clichés thrown in for good measure, all mixed together in a movie that wastes its entire middle act on watching a fuel guage go down.
 
I'm watching all the Nerdonymous videos now. That guy is ruthless lol
Honestly he does get a bit annoying after a while, I’ll be honest I only watched about 40 mins and was like: I get it. Dude you need another hobby.

Actually the uploader only made 3 videos and hasn’t posted in over 2 years so I suppose he did.
 
Honestly he does get a bit annoying after a while, I’ll be honest I only watched about 40 mins and was like: I get it. Dude you need another hobby.

Actually the uploader only made 3 videos and hasn’t posted in over 2 years so I suppose he did.
Haha yeah he's rather abrasive. The other channel with the Anti-Trilogy video (So Uncivilized) is far more pleasant, although not as well documented.

It helps that the latter deals with the finished product (which everyone can see) rather than the development process (which we only know by hearsay).
 
One thing I will say is that I think The Last Jedi was probably the worst “2nd film in a trilogy” I can ever remember, because it backed Rise of Skywalker onto a corner from the very start. At the end of The Last Jedi it had:

  • A Mary Sue main character who was already powerful and had 0 room for character or skill development
  • Killed off the “Big Bad”, leaving us with a manchild (whom the hero had already defeated twice) as the only threat left
  • Killed off the main legacy character who older fans were invested in
  • 0 established subplot for romance, enmity or whatever between the 3 hero leads
  • Retconning of all the stuff from film 1 about Maz whatsherface, Rey’s parents, Luke’s sabre etc
Like how do you make a 3rd film after that? So they had to bring back Palpo and the rest is history

This is not to excuse what happened in ROS ofc because most of it was terrible regardless of the above

1 - The First Order had all but "won" at the end of TLJ. The supposed great saviour of the galaxy had gone for good, the resistance was down to dying embers and no-one was showing up to help them.
2 - Killing off Snoke set up the final film to avoid a lame repeat of RoTJ* and setup tension between Hux (the competent fascist really in charge) vs Kylo Ren (an unstable mess but in charge because of magic powers).
3 - Luke dying is simply the classic hero journey where the mentor has to die to allow the story to be about the actual hero.
4 - Rey's parents being nobody important moved the story away from this small galaxy nonsense where every powerful force user has to be related to an existing one** and it allowed the character to move on from being defined by her past.
5 - It didn't retcon anything, it just refused to play ball with JJ Abrams' bullsh*t mystery boxes. Good.
6 - It setup Poe Dameron to be the leader of the resistance.

TLJ had issues but overall I really enjoyed it and it left the story teed up the final film just fine for any writer with a vague imagination, which you'd assume is a fundamental skill for a professional writer.

The big problem with the non-Lucas trilogy was there was no plan for the trilogy, it was just three films bolted together hoping it'd all work out in the end and when they decided Treverrow's script wasn't going to cut it they were already into production and on a deadline so we got what he'd written morphed into the insulting mess Abrams delivered on a tight schedule and somehow Palpatine returned (and Anton Chekhov rolled over in his grave a dozen times).

* we got a lame repeat of RoTJ.
** sigh...
 
The Rise of Skywalker is easily the worst movie in Star Wars franchise, and close behind are the previous two.

For me, Star Wars saga began with the Empire Strikes Back and ended with the Revenge of the Sith. In my head, the next three movies didn't happen.

About the other series, I have only watched Rogue One and Obi-Wan Kenobi, and both were good. Didn't watch Ahsoka, nor Mandalorian, and I don't wish to watch them tbh.

About Djokovic, it's irrelevant if he was better in 2011 or now. He's was winning everything in 2011, and he is winning everything in 2023.
 
The big problem with the non-Lucas trilogy was there was no plan for the trilogy, it was just three films bolted together hoping it'd all work out in the end and when they decided Treverrow's script wasn't going to cut it they were already into production and on a deadline so we got what he'd written morphed into the insulting mess Abrams delivered on a tight schedule and somehow Palpatine returned (and Anton Chekhov rolled over in his grave a dozen times).
There was a plan, Lucas had it written. They just decided to scrap it and put together a hasty soft reboot lolololol

The story problems started with 7 make no mistake. They're just better hidden because it's all setup, no answers.
 
Call me a zoomer, but I haven't watched any of the OG star wars movies because the VFX looked cringe.
I didn't like the Mary Sue ones either but I thoroughly enjoyed the shows such as Clone Wars, The Mandalorian and Rebels. Rebels is goated.
 
I'm old enough to have seen the original three SW movies when they were released. To me, they were, respectively, great, excellent and quite disappointing. Since then, I may have watched Star Wars and TESB once more apiece and hit the theatre for one sequel - which was kind of underwhelming for me.

I can't weigh in on the poll, other than the tennis part, and it's not ridiculous to assert that Novak's slam level in 2023 was very close to his level in 2011, or 15/16. Any physical drop has been negligible, and essentially offset by improvements in aspects of his game, greater experience and tailoring his schedule to peak at slams. Not a tough concept when we've seen it happen.
 
Enjoyed TFA. Same for Last Jedi on first viewing in the cinema. On rewatches you can see huge flaws with it, in particular the entire plot of the film and characterisation of Luke. We all wanted a Luke saber battle as a Jedi master but didn’t get anything, just a lame, pound shop throne room.

Rise of Skywalker did its best to correct mistakes of TLJ but comes across as very bad fanfic. “Somehow palpatine returned” never fails to crack me up so there’s that.


Ranking:
Return of the Jedi > Revenge of the sith > Empire > ANH >>>>> phantom menace > TFA > AOTC >>>>>>>>>> ROS > TLJ
 
Enjoyed TFA. Same for Last Jedi on first viewing in the cinema. On rewatches you can see huge flaws with it, in particular the entire plot of the film and characterisation of Luke. We all wanted a Luke saber battle as a Jedi master but didn’t get anything, just a lame, pound shop throne room.

Rise of Skywalker did its best to correct mistakes of TLJ but comes across as very bad fanfic. “Somehow palpatine returned” never fails to crack me up so there’s that.


Ranking:
Return of the Jedi > Revenge of the sith > Empire > ANH >>>>> phantom menace > TFA > AOTC >>>>>>>>>> ROS > TLJ
Nah, I’d rank AOTC higher than TFA. The epic battle of Geonosis alone makes this movie better than TFA. Plus Ewan McGregor, Samuel L. Jackson and Christopher Lee > the entire TFA cast save for Harrison Ford.
 
Enjoyed TFA. Same for Last Jedi on first viewing in the cinema. On rewatches you can see huge flaws with it, in particular the entire plot of the film and characterisation of Luke. We all wanted a Luke saber battle as a Jedi master but didn’t get anything, just a lame, pound shop throne room.

Unfortunately the whole plot around finding Our Lord And Saviour Luke in TFA seems to mean that people don't pay attention to being told explicitly in TFA, by Han, that the Last Jedi version of Luke is what to expect. TLJ's characterisation of Luke was what JJ Abrams set it up to be, it just wasn't what certain people were fantasizing it would be (including Mark Hamill, who'd forgotten about ESB and RoTJ).

TLJ has issues - the slow motion chase is visually interesting but even in-film the logic of it is broken by Finn/Rose coming and going and Rey shuttling in later on, and the Holdor manoeuvre was very dramatic but had to be justified better given its implications... though neither of those bits annoy me as much as Yoda interacting physically with the world did!
 
I previously posted a thread asking "Which statement is more absurd, "peak Djokovic at AO is better than peak Nadal at RG" or "Pete Sampras benefitted from a weak era"?
Apparently, the discussion was very interesting, filled with diverse opinions.

And now, I posted a part 2 to this. I hope you guys won't feel too annoyed. And to make things more interesting this time, this thread is for both tennis AND Star Wars fans.

I included what I thought were two of the most ridiculous and nonsensical claims for the tennis community and the Star Wars universe.
What is your choice? See the poll above :)
Another poll fell flat.
 
I think Kylo could have been an effective main villain in episode IX as @Wurm pointed out. Certainly creates the possibility for an interesting dynamic and power struggle between him and Hux. A shame JJ believed that he needed a new “shadowy big bad” in place of Snoke and just resurrected Palpatine.
 
I think Kylo could have been an effective main villain in episode IX as @Wurm pointed out. Certainly creates the possibility for an interesting dynamic and power struggle between him and Hux. A shame JJ believed that he needed a new “shadowy big bad” in place of Snoke and just resurrected Palpatine.
They should have kept Kylo as the villain instead of doing a half baked redemption story. He was lost the moment he killed his own father Han.
 
They should have kept Kylo as the villain instead of doing a half baked redemption story. He was lost the moment he killed his own father Han.
Agreed. In a sequel with Kylo as the true villain, we could see TLJ as him suppressing the last bit of vulnerability he had before committing fully to the dark side. It’d make him a tragic villain but still a villain.
 
Kylo Ren's character was ruined the moment he got trashed by a character who was using a lightsaber for the first time in her life. The way his fall to the dark side was explained was the final nail in the coffin.
 
I think Kylo could have been an effective main villain in episode IX as @Wurm pointed out. Certainly creates the possibility for an interesting dynamic and power struggle between him and Hux. A shame JJ believed that he needed a new “shadowy big bad” in place of Snoke and just resurrected Palpatine.
You could have built a decent story around the premises of the characters of Rey/Finn/Kylo as initially introduced.

Not only they didn't, but they kept shooting themselves in the foot, squandering every bit of potential they ever had.

No wonder John Boyega was sick of Star Wars by the time they were done.
 
Today, I watched the Vader and Obi-wan fight from the Kenobi series. It is the only scene from Kenobi I have watched. I have seen about three short clips of The Mandalorian of about a minute or less each. Other than that, I gave up on Disney Star Wars with the non-existent episode IX.

The Anakin and Obi-wan fight confirmed my sense that the Star Wars universe has become rather unmoored from the clear implications of the originals in ways that don’t quite rise to the level of official retconning. This is obviously an issue in the prequels, which does away with Leia’s memories of her real mother, memories that, because Luke doesn’t share them, suggest in very strong terms that their mother lived at least a few years after giving birth, with Luke separated from both her and Leia, but them not separated from each other. (Sure, fans have ad hoc accounts of how to make these accounts compatible, but they are basically incompatible).

Having Vader and obi-wan meet in between the fight that injured Vader and the fight that killed obi-wan seems to me to do the same. I don’t know how to reconcile Vader’s opening remarks (“the circle is now complete”…) on seeing obi-wan on the Death Star with any meetings since (very shortly after) he became Vader. Moreover, if they were to fight ten years after their previous fight, I don’t see how the fight would result in anything other than an easy win for Vader. That leads to another point at which the series has diverted from the original track: nowadays, it is a commonplace in fan communities to accept that Vader has much less power than Anakin had. Well, maybe he lost potential, but I don’t see how anyone could watch the originals and not believe that Vader had much more actual power than Anakin ever achieved. He is presented in the first couple of films as all but unbeatable. (he thinks he can’t beat the emperor - but experience later proves him wrong). For example, the occasion of Luke asking Yoda whether the dark side is more powerful is mention of Vader. Logical implication of the concurrence, it seems to me, is that Vader really was more powerful than any Jedi, or so at least Luke believed.

@Kralingen @aldeayeah As a followup to this, the prequels coming out after the originals result in a weird chronology in which fans often discuss events in the originals as though they show character development (which they do, in-universe, in a way) but that are actually the result of the writers of the prequels back deepening (to coin an ugly neologism) parts of the originals. The obvious example of this is how "you are on this council, but we do not grant you the rank of master" doesn't really explain Vader's inability to let things go in "when I left you, I was but the learner, now I am the master" so much as it creates it. Another example is this social media post that I just saw. In fact, Obi-Wan did the maneuver so that Boba Fett could later be said to have learned from it, not the other way around.

Movie and Entertainment Sphere


What is a hidden detail in Star Wars that no one knows about?
Not sure if this is a “hidden” detail, but when I saw this question, this was just the first thing that came to mind.
This isn’t exactly a physical detail on screen, but it is a detail that might blow your mind…. or might not. We shall see.
To begin, let’s go back to Attack of the Clones. Recall the asteroid scene with Jango—and Boba—and Obi-Wan Kenobi.
George Lucas actually inserted an interesting callback (or should I say call forward) to The Empire Strikes Back in Attack of the Clones.
Recall when Obi-Wan was trying to follow Jango Fett while on his way to Geonosis. He was trying to avoid detection, so he hid among the asteroid field.
Now remember how Obi-Wan was successful and followed Jango Fett all the way through?
Well…. there’s something significant about this.
Boba Fett was with his father Jango when Obi-Wan pulled this move. That, we all know.
What’s interesting is that years later when Han Solo maneuvers a similar “trick” if you will in The Empire Strikes Back as Obi-Wan, Boba Fett is easily able to find him. He essentially learned and remembered what Obi-Wan did all those years back in Attack of the Clones.
And to be clear, George Lucas did in fact confirm that this mini “connection” was intentional. He wanted to make it clear that Boba discovered Han decades later BECAUSE of his childhood experience with Obi-Wan.
In some ways this is hidden since we sort of just overlook this fact, but if you actually cared about this detail… that’s up to you I guess haha.
 
Nah, I’d rank AOTC higher than TFA. The epic battle of Geonosis alone makes this movie better than TFA. Plus Ewan McGregor, Samuel L. Jackson and Christopher Lee > the entire TFA cast save for Harrison Ford.
good point, Count Dooku as well. Felt like TFA was a good setup film without the answers, had a great first act and Han pretty much carried much of it.

AOTC was terrible for dialogue other than Christopher Lee and Ewan McGregor, but did have good action scenes.
 
Back
Top