ADuck
Legend
I personally believe Nadal *could* have lost 2011 if he had played Djokovic instead of Federer in the final. But still unlikely.
In 2014 I felt Nadal *should* have lost the title. He was playing quite miserably right through the clay season perhaps affected by his loss to Stan Wawrinka in the AO. But he somehow got some good form together right on time for the SF/F whilst Djokovic was somewhat affected by something (I forget). He was quite lucky that it worked out for him in the end and I was more happy for this than perhaps all his other RG victories.
Obviously people will have different definitions to what *should* means @vive le beau jeu ! But I don't mind that, just vote what it means for you
In 2014 I felt Nadal *should* have lost the title. He was playing quite miserably right through the clay season perhaps affected by his loss to Stan Wawrinka in the AO. But he somehow got some good form together right on time for the SF/F whilst Djokovic was somewhat affected by something (I forget). He was quite lucky that it worked out for him in the end and I was more happy for this than perhaps all his other RG victories.
Obviously people will have different definitions to what *should* means @vive le beau jeu ! But I don't mind that, just vote what it means for you