No such thing as "better". Only what YOU "prefer".
Yeah, I also prefer the 2014 version because it has a slightly crisper feel and swings a tad heavier than the 2012/2013 version.I preferred the 2014. It seemed to be a little softer with a lot more control. Which is weird considering I love the RF97, which is definitely stiffer with not as much pinpoint control.
what strings are best for pro staff 90s?
gut/poly hybrids, must you ask?![]()
They don't last long do they?
Use the right poly in the crosses and they last forever. Much longer than full poly for me, especially if you add string savers where you see fraying.
Which strings specifically do you recommend?
also, never heard of string savers, I'll have to look into that
Which strings specifically do you recommend?
also, never heard of string savers, I'll have to look into that
Tennis string gauges range from 15 (thickest) to 19 (thinnest), with half-gauges identified with an L (15L, 16L, etc), which is short for "light". A 15L string is thinner than a 15 gauge but thicker than a 16 gauge string.
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/LC/StringReference.html
No such thing as "better". Only what YOU "prefer".
Better for YOU does not mean better for everyone.Of course there is such thing as better. If what you prefer is better, than IT IS better.
Better for YOU does not mean better for everyone.
Which is better? Blue or red? Vanilla or chocolate? Tennis or basketball?
Great! But does that mean Red, Vanilla, and Tennis is better for EVERYONE?To answer your question: RED, Vanilla, and Tennis
Great! But does that mean Red, Vanilla, and Tennis is better for EVERYONE?
Besides, you may "prefer" the full-fat, high calorie, high sugar, high carb, full of artificial colors and flavors version of that Vanilla ice cream, but is it really "better" for you? Often times, people "prefer" things that are not actually "better" for them.