- What was striking about 2013 is that all tier 1 events were won by only 3 players. All 4 slams, all masters, WTF, 3 players only: Nadal, Djoko and Murray.
In 2013, not only did Fed win 0 tier 1 event but he reached only 1 final the whole year (Rome). That must have been his worst season since...forever. So it looked like Fed was the one of the big 4 on his way out (which also seemed consistent with his age.)
Bang, 2014 comes and what happens? It is Murray who vanishes with not even one tier 1 final to his name.
Question: Murray seems so far from his best level.
Temporary situation or worse?
-For the first time in their respective careers, the most successful Swiss of the year was not Federer! With 1 slam title and 1 master title, Wawrinka- rather out of the blue- outdoes Fed in achievements in 2014! (Fed won 2 masters). Can you feel the angst between the 2?
(aka WTF locker room saga)
- Both Fed and Nadal achieved mitigated results: consistency was there but more finals lost than won: 2/5 for Fed and 2/3 for Nadal. For Nadal at least 1 of the 2 was a slam. Fed will be happy to have recovered consistency at least after his disastrous 2013.
The question is: after recovering consistency, can he still get success in his mid-30s and with all his mileage?
- After his stunning run on both hard and clay in 2013, which led some fans to marvel about how he had become better on hard than on clay, it was back to good old clay this year for Rafa with his 2 titles coming on that surface.
(9th RG being nothing short of huge though)
Rafa's season also suffered a tough blow when he had to withdraw from summer hard court altogether. This is now the 3rd season in a row that Rafa has played the big events sort of part time with no USO and WTF in 2014, no AO in 2013 and no USO and WTF in 2012.
A legit concern now for his fans is: will Rafa play a full season on the tour ever again?
Given all he skipped, finishing the season at #3 is rather remarkable.
- Djokovic is still looking for another 2011. While he was the unambiguous dominant player for the season and the year end #1 in 3 out of the last 4 years, his season was still less dominant than Nadal' s 2013, 2010, 2008 and even 2005 (when Nadal had only 1 slam but overall titles in the double digits). It was also less dominant than all 4 years of Fed's prime (2004 to 2007).
So the main concern about Djoko is: despite the fact that this is rightfully seen as his era, will he ever have another multiple slam season?
- Finally, 2014 was a bit less "exclusive" than 2013 with guys like Cilic, Wawa and Tsonga managing to sneak some big ones away from the usual same old.
Question: does that mean we are transitioning to new players taking charge? Not convincing yet with both Tsonga and Cilic wins being a "one off".