Shapo.
What title says. We know next-gen players are not famous for their net skills. But among them, who’s the best at the net?
Lol what, tsitsipas and it's not close. Zverev has improve but no
Zverev
Yep. Every single one of the big 3 is a much stronger volleyer than any of the little 4. I will say that Shapo looks great at net though when he isn't in his unforced error modeI think it'll probably be Tsitsipas because he continues to show improvement there. Shapo as well (both are inconsistent but they come to net often).
It's funny but I actually believe all of them are currently inferior in terms of volleys/net play to Djokovic imo. So that should tell you enough.
I was joking lolDid you watch the match between him and Tsitsipas at Cinci? He was absolute garbage at the net. It got so bad that at one point it was pretty much the only reason he was losing.
Weirdly I think his volley has actually regressed. I thought it was a stronger shot 2 years ago than it is now.I think it'll probably be Tsitsipas because he continues to show improvement there. Shapo as well (both are inconsistent but they come to net often).
It's funny but I actually believe all of them are currently inferior in terms of volleys/net play to Djokovic imo. So that should tell you enough.
That’s a good point actually I think he had quicker hands and feet back then. Seemed to be better at those running stoop down volleys then.Weirdly I think his volley has actually regressed. I thought it was a stronger shot 2 years ago than it is now.
This may be simplistic, but I think he simply doesn't venture up there as much anymore and its made him rusty.That’s a good point actually I think he had quicker hands and feet back then. Seemed to be better at those running stoop down volleys then.
It’s still strong in big moments though which is really what I rate the most in comparison to next gen. He seemed to get every meaningful net exchange right in the AO/Wimby finals.
None of them. Even Federer was a poor volleyer compared to McEnroe, Edberg or Pete.
Serve and volley is dead, not because people cannot volley. It is because passing shots are much more precise with more power and more spin. That is due to poly strings. That makes people go less often to the net, and hence less skilled there, because they don't train it.None of them. Even Federer was a poor volleyer compared to McEnroe, Edberg or Pete. And Fed at 40 is still 100 times the volleyer of any next gen player.
Those saying Denis is a good volleyer must be on heavy drugs. He’s atrocious with the touch of a brick at net. Just because he approaches more often doesn’t mean he’s a good volleyer. They’re all absolutely terrible. Just ask yourself this: when do any of them serve and volley? The answer is “almost never.”
I think Hurkacz is pretty good. Going to actual Next Gen, I'd go with Alcaraz.
Well, there's a double definition of NextGen. Players that initially were labeled "NextGen" when they created the tournament (players born roughly 96-99), and the current players that are eligible for the NextGen tournament (players born 2000 or later).Why isn't Hurkacz NextGen?
Well, there's a double definition of NextGen. Players that initially were labeled "NextGen" when they created the tournament (players born roughly 96-99), and the current players that are eligible for the NextGen tournament (players born 2000 or later).
Nothing I said clashed with your points here lol.Not that it really matters, but...
I feel like they created the NextGen label for Coric and Zverev (see the article below from 2017). Hurkacz is the same age as Zverev, and Medvedev was born in the same year as Coric although he's several months older. Either way they were all 21 and younger in 2017, which is the definition of NextGen (in terms of the tournament at least).
By that definition Kyrgios is not NextGen, although I can see someone including him in that bunch since he's close enough. Thiem is definitely not NextGen.
Nothing I said clashed with your points here lol.
I will put Zverev into Tier 3 - other than that you are correct.Generally solid tier - Tsitsipas, Alcaraz, Popyrin, Musetti, Federer, Hurkacz, De Minaur, Humbert
Up and down tier - Zverev, FAA, Shapo, Tiafoe, Fritz
Pretty bad tier - Medvedev, Sinner, Rublev, Coric
Yeah, I agree. It's so easy to jump on the "it was so much better in the ol' days" bandwagon. I used think like that, especially as a former 5.0 serve and volleyer who played competitively in the early 90's, but once I started watching those old matches of yesteryear, I realized those old greats weren't as consistently great at volleying as we think. In the old days, the good volleyers would, on at least 1/3 of the approaches, just slice a ball in the middle of the court with enough depth and come in. Yet they could still count on winning over 50% of these points if they had the other player running a bit because the passing shot wouldn't be consistently low and hard. Watch any sampras match again with the expectation of today's passing shots and you'd start saying, "why would he come in on such a weak shot?" And yet he did, and he won many of them. These days no one can do that.Serve and volley is dead, not because people cannot volley. It is because passing shots are much more precise with more power and more spin. That is due to poly strings. That makes people go less often to the net, and hence less skilled there, because they don't train it.
Difference between good touch and good volleys: the only ones who I think satisfy both are Sock, Dimitrov, and Herbert. Close behind is Moutet, Musetti, Gaston, Tiafoe, Alcaraz, Demon.
Good touch but average volleys: Kyrgios, Benoit, Berrettini, Hurkacz, Schwartzman.
Bad touch bad volleys: Shapo, Med, Rublev, Kokk, Zverev, Fritz, Khach.