Who had it tougher?

Whose record breaking consecutive wins on Masters 1000 tournaments had tougher competition?

  • Novak Đoković

  • Jannik Sinner

Results are only viewable after voting.
AO13

AO13

Hall of Fame
Novak Đoković 2011 Masters 1000 run:

INDIAN WELLS

2R: Novak Đoković vs Andrey Golubev (39) - 6:0, 6:4
3R: Novak Đoković vs Ernests Gulbis (34) - 6:0, 6:1
4R: Novak Đoković vs Viktor Troicki (18) - 6:0, 6:1
QF: Novak Đoković vs Richard Gasquet (21) - 6:2, 6:4
SF: Novak Đoković vs Roger Federer (2) - 6:3, 3:6, 6:2
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 4:6, 6:3, 6:2

MIAMI

2R: Novak Đoković vs Denis Istomin (54) - 6:0, 6:1
3R: Novak Đoković vs James Blake (173) - 6:2, 6:0
4R Novak Đoković vs Viktor Troicki (17) - 6:3, 6:2
QF: Novak Đoković vs Kevin Anderson (40) - 6:4, 6:2
SF: Novak Đoković vs Mardy Fish (15) - 6:3, 6:1
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 4:6, 6:3, 7:6 (4)

MADRID

2R: Novak Đoković vs Kevin Anderson (35) - 6:3, 6:4
3R: Novak Đoković vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez (29) - 6:1, 6:2
QF: Novak Đoković vs David Ferrer (6) - 6:4, 4:6, 6:3
SF: Novak Đoković vs Thomaz Bellucci (36) - 4:6, 6:4, 6:1
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 7:5, 6:4

ROME

2R: Novak Đoković vs Lukasz Kubot (141) - 6:0, 6:3
3R: Novak Đoković vs Stanislas Wawrinka (14) - 6:4, 6:1
QF: Novak Đoković vs Robin Soderling (5) - 6:3, 6:0
SF: Novak Đoković vs Andy Murray (4) - 6:1, 3:6, 7:6 (2)
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 6:4, 6:4

MONTREAL

2R: Novak Đoković vs Nikolay Davydenko (30) - 7:5, 6:1
3R: Novak Đoković vs Marin Čilić (29) - 7:5, 6:2
QF: Novak Đoković vs Gael Monfils (7) - 6:1, 6:1
SF: Novak Đoković vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (16) - 6:4, 3:0 RET
F: Novak Đoković vs Mardy Fish (8) - 6:2, 3:6, 6:4

CINCINNATI

2R: Novak Đoković vs Ryan Harrison (78) - 6:2, 6:3
3R: Novak Đoković vs Radek Štepanek (29) - 6:3, 6:3
QF: Novak Đoković vs Gael Monfils (8) - 3:6, 6:4, 6:3
SF: Novak Đoković vs Tomaš Berdych (9) - 7:5 RET
F: Andy Murray (4) vs Novak Đoković - 6:4, 3:0 RET

31 consecutive wins, Nadal beaten 4 times in 4 finals, 2 of them on clay. Federer and Murray both beaten once, before Murray finally beating Đoković in the finals of Cincinnati. During the run he faced a top 10 player 13 times.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jannik Sinner 2025/2026 Masters 1000 run:

PARIS

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Zizou Bergs (41) - 6:4, 6:2
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Francisco Cerundolo (21) - 7:5, 6:1
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton (7) - 6:3, 6:3
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (3) - 6:0, 6:1
F: Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger-Aliassime (10) - 6:4, 7:6 (4)

INDIAN WELLS

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Dalibor Svrčina (109) - 6:1, 6:1
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Denis Shapovalov (39) - 6:3, 6:2
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Joao Fonseca (35) - 7:6 (6), 7:6 (4)
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Learner Tien (27) - 6:1, 6:2
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (4) - 6:2, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Daniil Medvedev (11) - 7:6 (6), 7:6 (4)

MIAMI

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Damir Džumhur (76) - 6:3, 6:3
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Corentin Moutet (33) - 6:1, 6:4
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Alex Michelsen (40) - 7:5, 7:6 (4)
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Frances Tiafoe (20) - 6:2, 6:2
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (4) - 6:3, 7:6 (4)
F: Jannik Sinner vs Jiri Lehečka (22) - 6:4, 6:4

MONTE CARLO

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Hugo Umbert (34) - 6:3, 6:0
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Tomaš Machač (53) - 6:1, 6:7 (3), 6:3
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger-Aliassime (7) - 6:3, 6:4
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (3) - 6:1, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Carlos Alcaraz (1) - 7:6 (5), 6:3

MADRID

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Benjamin Bonzi (104) - 6:7 (6), 6:1, 6:4
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Elmer Moller (169) - 6:2, 6:3
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Cameron Norrie (23) - 6:2, 7:5
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Rafael Jodar (42) - 6:2, 7:6 (0)
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Arthur Fils (25) - 6:2, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (3) - 6:1, 6:2

ROME

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Sebastian Ofner (82) - 6:3, 6:4
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Alexei Popyrin (60) - 6:2, 6:0
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Andrea Pellegrino (155) - 6:2, 6:3
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Andrey Rublev (14) - 6:2, 6:4
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Daniil Medvedev (9) - 6:2, 5:7, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Casper Ruud (25) - 6:4, 6:4

This is an active run. Sinner beat Alcaraz once and Zverev five times en route to new record of 34 consecutive wins on Masters 1000 tournaments. He faced a top 10 players 10 times during this run.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

So the question is, who had a tougher competition en route to making record? Please vote and feel free to leave thoughts and opinions.​
 
Last edited:
Djokovic at 2015 canada and cincinnati finals faced Murray and Federer, or he would have won 11 consecutive Masters with Sinner's competition
 
Record is record.
Sinner can only play with the opponent at the other side of court.
FEDERER won FO without beating Rafa .
Can we say his FO is weak.
Sinner is playing some TOP tier tennis . If you can enjoy it that is fine.
If somebody doesn't enjoy than take a break and come again when Alcaraz come back
 
Djokovic no doubt, but if Sinner somehow gets CYM1000, even without facing Alcaraz again, I think this will be considered harder to achieve than Djokovic's IW - Cincinatti trail, even though Djokovic had to face Nadal 4 times, Fed once and Murray once.
 
rigged said:
Djokovic no doubt, but if Sinner somehow gets CYM1000, even without facing Alcaraz again, I think this will be considered harder to achieve than Djokovic's IW - Cincinatti trail, even though Djokovic had to face Nadal 4 times, Fed once and Murray once.
Click to expand...
CYM 1000 winning 9 masters in a year.
I will say it is more difficult than CYGS.
Forget about competition the amount of matches one has to play ?
 
Numbers are numbers, but only when it is comparable in terms of draw sizes.

Sinner won more with the caveat being Rome and Madrid have 96 player draw now, making for one easy match with an unseeded player each.

Still it is a great run. But he's gonna have an asterisk over his career with the failed drug tests. So not much to say.
 
If we're talking about what we might consider the equivalents of the Masters 1000 tournaments in the 1980s and early 1990s, neither of the two players mentioned had it as tough as Lendl.

Until 1981, Lendl was up against the prime-form Borg. Then, until 1983, it was Connors, and finally, until 1985, McEnroe.

He also faced Wilander at his best from 1985 until 1989, plus the top-form Becker and Edberg from 1989 until the Czech retired.

From the early 1990s onwards, he also had to contend with Agassi, Sampras, Courier and Chang.
 
Last edited:
Hitman said:
Is the question irrelevant to YOU though?
Click to expand...

I surely find it irrelevant because Sinner is facing stronger competition than Djokovic did in the 2020-2023 era

Djokovic's competiton was Zverev and Mugvedev
Sinner's competition is Djokovic and Alcaraz

So it is an irrelevant question
 
Djokovic pretty clearly, but he also skipped MC which could have made the run considerably shorter.
 
Last edited:
Razer said:
I surely find it irrelevant because Sinner is facing stronger competition than Djokovic did in the 2020-2023 era

Djokovic's competiton was Zverev and Mugvedev
Sinner's competition is Djokovic and Alcaraz

So it is an irrelevant question
Click to expand...

Is the question being asked about 2020-2023 vs 2024--2026?
 
Jonas78 said:
Djokovic pretty clearly, but he also skipped MC which could have made the run considerably shorter.
Click to expand...
Or longer, as a matter of fact. :D

Man was on a rampage. Add to this run AO and Wimbledon win and it's brutal how many times he defeated Nadal and won almost everything during the run apart from Rolan Garros because of the Swiss maestro.​
 
Cramerica said:
I don't know but Sinner is basically knocking all these out in an hour and a half each.
Click to expand...
Sinner has only dropped 2(!!) sets in his win streak compared to Djokovic's 8.
But Djokovic on the otherhand gave his opponents an impressive 7 bagel and 11 breadstick sets compared to Sinner's 3 and 8.
 
Razer said:
@Hitman told me that only numbers matter, who had it tougher is not relevant, so this question is irrelevant. @ND-13 would agree with me.
Click to expand...

I am already seeing the “Numbers are numbers” brigade embracing context now that records are beginning to evaporate .

It is funny to see the change in stance .

Some other folks characterize Sinner as boring , machine , clostobel all as coping mechanism
 
ND-13 said:
I am already seeing the “Numbers are numbers” brigade embracing context now that records are beginning to evaporate .

It is funny to see the change in stance .

Some other folks characterize Sinner as boring , machine , clostobel all as coping mechanism
Click to expand...

I hope Sinner erases all of Djokovic's numbers but he won't be able to, because he is not that good enough, but then who knows?... in this era of weak next gens he could if he finds great longevity into the 30s with no good rivals below him but it is a huge ask. He needs to work a lot on his stamina. Maybe he even needs to contact Nadal/Alcaraz's doctor Cotorro.

It will be fitting if Sinner/Alcaraz crush Djokovic's numbers because homogenization always produced better numbers, Fed tore Sampras's numbers, then Djokovic and Nadal went past Federer's numbers due to 90s gen. All we need is a 5th slam and then Sinner can do it for sure. Nobody will care if the past players did it with 4 slams, always the new guys will be rated ahead.
 
NachoGPT said:
Then any records broken will have a permanent asterisk so go ahead.
Click to expand...

There are no asterisks bud

The young guys don't care for context

You will be seen as an old geezer rambling, if you try to lecture kids born today about how the past guys did it in 4 slams setup etc .... for the younger crowd Djokovic is just stale air, they just want to open the windows and send him out.
 
Razer said:
There are no asterisks bud

The young guys don't care for context

You will be seen as an old geezer rambling, if you try to lecture kids born today about how the past guys did it in 4 slams setup etc .... for the younger crowd Djokovic is just stale air, they just want to open the windows and send him out.
Click to expand...

Numbers are numbers.

Djokovic knew there was talk of a 5th major coming up.

So may be he should stay on tour a little longer
 
Razer said:
There are no asterisks bud

The young guys don't care for context

You will be seen as an old geezer rambling, if you try to lecture kids born today about how the past guys did it in 4 slams setup etc .... for the younger crowd Djokovic is just stale air, they just want to open the windows and send him out.
Click to expand...
I think it’s a disrespect to the players of the past to create a fifth slam. Not to mention the lack of prestige. 4 slams is perfect.

We don’t need the Saudis to suck the soul out of tennis.
 
NachoGPT said:
I think it’s a disrespect to the players of the past to create a fifth slam. Not to mention the lack of prestige. 4 slams is perfect.

We don’t need the Saudis to suck the soul out of tennis.
Click to expand...

Disrespect to the past ???

Why did you promote the Australian Open into a regular slam, enhance careers into 30s of athletes by homogenization and then count Djokovic's numbers or Big 3's numbers ???

You disrespected the past, didn't you ? So we reap what we sow, future generatons don't owe the BIg 3 anything, I would say give 5th slam to Italy and give 6th slam to Saudi Arabia.

Lets have 6 slams !!!
 
Razer said:
Disrespect to the past ???

Why did you promote the Australian Open into a regular slam, enhance careers into 30s of athletes by homogenization and then count Djokovic's numbers or Big 3's numbers ???

You disrespected the past, didn't you ? So we reap what we sow, future generatons don't owe the BIg 3 anything, I would say give 5th slam to Italy and give 6th slam to Saudi

Lets have 6 slams !!!
Click to expand...
You’re just ragebaiting now lol
 
Neptune said:
2011 Nole farms Rafa
2026 Sinner farms Zverev

Not much difference, I guess? ;)
Click to expand...
images
 
credits to djoker defeating much tougher opponents
well
it just shows again that these statistics are meaningless and cannot objectively show the reality of competitiveness
crybabies
either accept
your idol sooner or later will not be the greatest as records show or
greatness should not be measured by statistics
 
Razer said:
I hope Sinner erases all of Djokovic's numbers but he won't be able to, because he is not that good enough, but then who knows?... in this era of weak next gens he could if he finds great longevity into the 30s with no good rivals below him but it is a huge ask. He needs to work a lot on his stamina. Maybe he even needs to contact Nadal/Alcaraz's doctor Cotorro.

It will be fitting if Sinner/Alcaraz crush Djokovic's numbers because homogenization always produced better numbers, Fed tore Sampras's numbers, then Djokovic and Nadal went past Federer's numbers due to 90s gen. All we need is a 5th slam and then Sinner can do it for sure. Nobody will care if the past players did it with 4 slams, always the new guys will be rated ahead.
Click to expand...
sinner is difficult to break most records of djoker who does have the most successful career despite the shxt era since 2020
however, sinner has a big chance of winning the slam race
i look forward to how those crybabies flooding statistics to explain djoker is greater (though i dont agree greatness conparison is meaningful)
 
The thing is, with Alcaraz recovering and then 39 y/o Djokovic not caring a single bit about Masters, Sinner is gonna be an even bigger favorite during the indoor HC season.
 
AO13 said:
Novak Đoković 2011 Masters 1000 run:

INDIAN WELLS
2R: Novak Đoković vs Andrey Golubev (39) - 6:0, 6:4
3R: Novak Đoković vs Ernests Gulbis (34) - 6:0, 6:1
4R: Novak Đoković vs Viktor Troicki (18) - 6:0, 6:1
QF: Novak Đoković vs Richard Gasquet (21) - 6:2, 6:4
SF: Novak Đoković vs Roger Federer (2) - 6:3, 3:6, 6:2
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 4:6, 6:3, 6:2

MIAMI
2R: Novak Đoković vs Denis Istomin (54) - 6:0, 6:1
3R: Novak Đoković vs James Blake (173) - 6:2, 6:0
4R Novak Đoković vs Viktor Troicki (17) - 6:3, 6:2
QF: Novak Đoković vs Kevin Anderson (40) - 6:4, 6:2
SF: Novak Đoković vs Mardy Fish (15) - 6:3, 6:1
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 4:6, 6:3, 7:6 (4)

MADRID

2R: Novak Đoković vs Kevin Anderson (35) - 6:3, 6:4
3R: Novak Đoković vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez (29) - 6:1, 6:2
QF: Novak Đoković vs David Ferrer (6) - 6:4, 4:6, 6:3
SF: Novak Đoković vs Thomaz Bellucci (36) - 4:6, 6:4, 6:1
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 7:5, 6:4

ROME

2R: Novak Đoković vs Lukasz Kubot (141) - 6:0, 6:3
3R: Novak Đoković vs Stanislas Wawrinka (14) - 6:4, 6:1
QF: Novak Đoković vs Robin Soderling (5) - 6:3, 6:0
SF: Novak Đoković vs Andy Murray (4) - 6:1, 3:6, 7:6 (2)
F: Novak Đoković vs Rafael Nadal (1) - 6:4, 6:4

MONTREAL

2R: Novak Đoković vs Nikolay Davydenko (30) - 7:5, 6:1
3R: Novak Đoković vs Marin Čilić (29) - 7:5, 6:2
QF: Novak Đoković vs Gael Monfils (7) - 6:1, 6:1
SF: Novak Đoković vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (16) - 6:4, 3:0 RET
F: Novak Đoković vs Mardy Fish (8) - 6:2, 3:6, 6:4

CINCINNATI

2R: Novak Đoković vs Ryan Harrison (78) - 6:2, 6:3
3R: Novak Đoković vs Radek Štepanek (29) - 6:3, 6:3
QF: Novak Đoković vs Gael Monfils (8) - 3:6, 6:4, 6:3
SF: Novak Đoković vs Tomaš Berdych (9) - 7:5 RET
F: Andy Murray (4) vs Novak Đoković - 6:4, 3:0 RET

31 consecutive wins, Nadal beaten 4 times in 4 finals, 2 of them on clay. Federer and Murray both beaten once, before Murray finally beating Đoković in the finals of Cincinnati. During the run he faced a top 10 player 13 times.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jannik Sinner 2025/2026 Masters 1000 run:

PARIS
2R: Jannik Sinner vs Zizou Bergs (41) - 6:4, 6:2
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Francisco Cerundolo (21) - 7:5, 6:1
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Ben Shelton (7) - 6:3, 6:3
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (3) - 6:0, 6:1
F: Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger-Aliassime (10) - 6:4, 7:6 (4)

INDIAN WELLS
2R: Jannik Sinner vs Dalibor Svrčina (109) - 6:1, 6:1
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Denis Shapovalov (39) - 6:3, 6:2
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Joao Fonseca (35) - 7:6 (6), 7:6 (4)
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Learner Tien (27) - 6:1, 6:2
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (4) - 6:2, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Daniil Medvedev (11) - 7:6 (6), 7:6 (4)

MIAMI

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Damir Džumhur (76) - 6:3, 6:3
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Corentin Moutet (33) - 6:1, 6:4
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Alex Michelsen (40) - 7:5, 7:6 (4)
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Frances Tiafoe (20) - 6:2, 6:2
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (4) - 6:3, 7:6 (4)
F: Jannik Sinner vs Jiri Lehečka (22) - 6:4, 6:4

MONTE CARLO

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Hugo Umbert (34) - 6:3, 6:0
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Tomaš Machač (53) - 6:1, 6:7 (3), 6:3
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger-Aliassime (7) - 6:3, 6:4
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (3) - 6:1, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Carlos Alcaraz (1) - 7:6 (5), 6:3

MADRID

2R: Jannik Sinner vs Benjamin Bonzi (104) - 6:7 (6), 6:1, 6:4
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Elmer Moller (169) - 6:2, 6:3
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Cameron Norrie (23) - 6:2, 7:5
QF: Jannik Sinner vs Rafael Jodar (42) - 6:2, 7:6 (0)
SF: Jannik Sinner vs Arthur Fils (25) - 6:2, 6:4
F: Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev (3) - 6:1, 6:2

ROME
2R: Jannik Sinner vs Sebastian Ofner (82) - 6:3, 6:4
3R: Jannik Sinner vs Alexei Popyrin (60) - 6:2, 6:0
4R: Jannik Sinner vs Andrea Pellegrino (155) - 6:2, 6:3
QF: Jannik Sinner - Andrey Rublev (14) - 6:2, 6:4
SF: Jannik Sinner - ???

This is an active run. Sinner beat Alcaraz once and Zverev five times en route to new record of 32 consecutive wins on Masters 1000 tournaments. He faced a top 10 players 9 times during this run.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

So the question is, who had a tougher competition en route to making record? Please vote and feel free to leave thoughts and opinions.​
Click to expand...
All of the folks chosing "option 2" are just doing it because they hate Djokovic. There is no chance in hell you believe in it.
 
accidental said:
Will be hilarious when his run is ended by Casper Ruud
Click to expand...
I actually think Medvedev will beat him in the semis. :-D

On the other hand, I see many users who don't like Djokovic came here to say how numbers are numbers. The topic is not which run is longer, obviously it's Sinner's and I am not discrediting him. One of the users is actually a guy who in his signature says money, fame, popularity matters when we determine who is the greatest ever, so he is a little bit hypocritical it seems about this topic. In my opinion, numbers are numbers, especially in Djokovic's case because he obtained those numbers while competing directly against his main opponents in the GOAT race.

But if Sinner, or Alcaraz, or whoever, succeeds in obtaining 25 slams, with more than 40 masters, more than 428 weeks at number 1, more than 7 ATP finals titles, he will clearly be the greatest of all time, even if he comes from Djibouti and has 73 supporters around the world. That's the point of sport, being the best amongst competitors, not how popular or famous you are, this isn't Hollywood.

I am happy with my life and my life isn't shaped by Djokovic's success. I rooted for him when he was slamless and I doubt he would ever win a slam. I never imagined he would win 10, or that he could even come close to any of Federer and Nadal's record by that time. I was lucky my favorite player become a monster and ended up as the greatest ever and I am happy for Novak. Boy he did deserve that after all he endured during both his childhood years and professional career. But I would be more than willing to acknowledge if in the future new tennis star smash all his records, to me he will be the greatest tennis player of all time, and Djokovic would simply be one of the greatest, as Nadal and Federer are. But there can only be one on the top at any given time, and today, yesterday and many days to come, that is for now Novak Djokovic.​
 
AO13 said:
I actually think Medvedev will beat him in the semis. :-D

On the other hand, I see many users who don't like Djokovic came here to say how numbers are numbers. The topic is not which run is longer, obviously it's Sinner's and I am not discrediting him. One of the users is actually a guy who in his signature says money, fame, popularity matters when we determine who is the greatest ever, so he is a little bit hypocritical it seems about this topic. In my opinion, numbers are numbers, especially in Djokovic's case because he obtained those numbers while competing directly against his main opponents in the GOAT race.

But if Sinner, or Alcaraz, or whoever, succeeds in obtaining 25 slams, with more than 40 masters, more than 428 weeks at number 1, more than 7 ATP finals titles, he will clearly be the greatest of all time, even if he comes from Djibouti and has 73 supporters around the world. That's the point of sport, being the best amongst competitors, not how popular or famous you are, this isn't Hollywood.

I am happy with my life and my life isn't shaped by Djokovic's success. I rooted for him when he was slamless and I doubt he would ever win a slam. I never imagined he would win 10, or that he could even come close to any of Federer and Nadal's record by that time. I was lucky my favorite player become a monster and ended up as the greatest ever and I am happy for Novak. Boy he did deserve that after all he endured during both his childhood years and professional career. But I would be more than willing to acknowledge if in the future new tennis star smash all his records, to me he will be the greatest tennis player of all time, and Djokovic would simply be one of the greatest, as Nadal and Federer are. But there can only be one on the top at any given time, and today, yesterday and many days to come, that is for now Novak Djokovic.​
Click to expand...

It cannot be said with a straight face that Djokovic is the greatest when right in front of our eyes Sinner has won last 7 out of 8 matches
 
ND-13 said:
It cannot be said with a straight face that Djokovic is the greatest when right in front of our eyes Sinner has won last 7 out of 8 matches​
Click to expand...
Yeah and you are trolling again. Age gap is not 14 months, it's 14 freaking years. When Sinner was born Djokovic might have lost his virginity for God's sake.​
 
AO13 said:
Yeah and you are trolling again. Age gap is not 14 months, it's 14 freaking years. When Sinner was born Djokovic might have lost his virginity for God's sake.​
Click to expand...

That's not the actual part of the troll though....

He is still counting 2 exho matches as legit official matches to give Sinner the 7 matches, when we all know the real H2H between them is 6-5....so if Sinner didn't even beat Djokovic 7 times in total ever, how did he win 7 matches in a row?

I don't know if you want to call it trolling or just flat of lying, take your pick.
 
AO13 said:
Yeah and you are trolling again. Age gap is not 14 months, it's 14 freaking years. When Sinner was born Djokovic might have lost his virginity for God's sake.​
Click to expand...

Djokovic would have won 5-6 majors last 2 years without SinneraZ. No age excuses please
 
Era comparisons are useless and never work.
Who's better?
2001 Ravens defense or the 2014 Seahawks Legion of Boom
2001 Lakers or 96 Bulls team vs Warriors 2015 team

Put Djokovic back in the 90s he wouldn't have that type of defense, backhand or serve. He'd lose to Becker, Goran, Chang, etc.

Players can only play those who are in the same draw or era.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

tennis_error
Guess QF matches, ATP AO...
Replies
1
Views
272
Aabye5
Aabye5
JennyS
Players who blew the multiple 2 sets to 0 leads in Grand Slams during the decade
Replies
4
Views
1K
vbranis
vbranis
sometennisdot
Since 2020 US Open, Djokovic is 14-2 (87.50%) after losing first set
Replies
6
Views
633
pj80
P
AnOctorokForDinner
A list of Big 4 ATP level matches without them creating a BP
Replies
8
Views
919
AnOctorokForDinner
AnOctorokForDinner
jm1980
Djokovic has the fewest retirements and W/O among Top 10 players (last 300 matches)
Replies
32
Views
3K
MichaelNadal
MichaelNadal
Back
Top