Who had the better peak at Wimbledon, Borg or Federer?

Peak Fed vs Peak Borg at Wimbledon; who’s better?


  • Total voters
    49
Still more plausible than any "injury" Nadal or Djokovic claimed they had while simultaneously winning slams in case of the former or knowing loss is imminent in case of the latter.
 
So let me get this straight the old time athletes would have wiped out all the new big man super athletes but if these new super robo athletes went back to the old courts and rackets they would be inept and invalids?
Ok got it.
Stopped reading esp after the statement "federer was not a premier grass court player after 2006".
The bias and convoluted circle jerk double standard. Bleeding from the eyes and ears now. Call 911.
It would be like putting Labron James on a tennis court with Diego Schwartzman, or Ash Barty.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
 
interesting to note that fraudsters in this thread are not downplaying borg at all with comments like 8>5.....full marks to op for putting them in a fix......
 
Federer, but I have an incredible amount of respect for what Borg did at Wimbledon. He is the only player in history who completely changed his natural game so completely for another surface and dominated. Arguably the greatest baseliner in history, coming to grass and serve and volleying on 1st and sometimes 2nd serves, not his natural game at all, and winning 5 Wimbledons in a row, and being nearly as dominant as he was on clay.

It is nothing like Djokovic and Borg who just play their natural excellent baseline only games on now phony rye grass.
 
Back
Top