NO, Novak Djokovic the overall GOAT being better than Rafael Nadal the GOAT baseliner in more individual aspects of the game does not mean that novak djokovic is a better baseliner than nadal because it completely depends on how much quantitatively superior one is in every single aspect of the game and we must consider the ENTIRE careers of both novak djokovic and rafael nadal not just "after 2011". Novak djokovic has a slightly stronger backhand than rafael nadal but rafael nadal has a relatively even stronger forehand than novak djokovic which gives rafael nadal an overall edge over novak djokovic on average in pure baselining BUT novak djokovic has another advantage over rafael nadal in the first serve department which in totality neutralizes the slight baseline advantage that rafael nadal has over novak djokovic in terms of pure baselining. I believe you and many others are making a complete grave mistake in completely ignoring the fact that similar to roger federer though to a lesser extent, novak djokovic is dependent on the efficacy of his serve in order to beat rafael nadal. Even after 2011, novak djokovic has had many numerous close encounters with rafael nadal across all surfaces including grass, hard, and clay where without the efficacy of novak djokovic's serve, rafael nadal would have certainly defeated novak djokovic with rafael nadal's GOAT baselining. There is absolutely a mathematical objective reason why the head-to-head and grand slam count is so close between novak djokovic and rafael nadal since if novak djokovic was both better at serving and baselining compared to rafael nadal, rafael nadal certainly would never have reached 22 grand slams and would never have reached FOURTEEN ROLAND GARROS TITLES which all could have only happened due to the fact that Rafael Nadal is the GOAT of baselining with the best pure forehand and backhand combination ever!
Clay is the surface where the baseline game is exaggerated, but this does not mean that being a better clay player automatically means being a better baseline player.
Current example, Ruud is a better clay player than Medvedev, ditto Tsitsipas, but both are not better baseline players than Medvedev.
On clay the surface is slower and simply allows players to have more time available to hit the ball, which is the predominant thing for a player like Nadal and his such a wide movement with the forehand.
But on faster surfaces where he has less time to hit his forehand is much more faulty and is not as solid as Djokovic's.
The analyses must be extended to all surfaces, giving greater prevalence to hard surfaces since they are the most practiced on the circuit.
As for the primordial speech, I simply say that Djokovic peak against Nadal peak would have seen the Serb prevail in 3 out of 4 slams, and this cannot be justified only thanks to a more incisive serve.
I have taken the comparison into consideration since 2011 because Djokovic became the GOAT starting from that season.
23 of his 24 slams are enclosed in a time span of 13 years, while Nadal's 22 in a time span of 18 years.
This means that Nadal has been more consistent, and above all early , while Djokovic exploded much later, concentrating his successes in a shorter period of time, and yet in this shorter period of time he has won more than Nadal did from 2005 to 2022.
Since the aspects must be evaluated with the players at their peak, I find nothing anomalous in considering Djokovic superior to Nadal in most aspects, having had a higher peak.
