gasquet? pretty backhand
Agassi was owned by every truly great baseliner he played (Courier, Lendl, Federer), and was owned by all the top clay court baseliners (Muster, Kuerten, Bruguera) on clay as well. No way in hell is he the best baseliner ever.
federer doesn't have a back hand.Federer's backhand isnt strong enough to say he had the best groundstrokes of all time. My choice would be one of the following:
Nadal
Borg
Laver
Rosewall
Federer's backhand isnt strong enough to say he had the best groundstrokes of all time. My choice would be one of the following:
Nadal
Borg
Laver
Rosewall
The best combination of FH and BH? I'm in minority, but I choose Nalbandian. His serve is meh though.
LOL. Nalbandian? that has me in stiches, that guy must be the overrated player on here.
Nalby's forehand is overrated and I agree with TMOP's list
The best combination of FH and BH? I'm in minority, but I choose Nalbandian. His serve is meh though.
If anything, Nalbandian's forehand is underrated.
It's not a high percentage shot like Nadal or Djokovic's forehand, he hits it flat and sharp angled, with almost no margin for error. When Nalbandian's in form he can keep up in forehand rallys with anyone, including Federer.
Never disagreed here, Nalbandian doesn't have the results to be an objective choice for best ground-strokes of all time, but that doesn't change the fact that his forehand is probably rather underrated than overrated.we're not talking about whether someone can *keep up* with other players in a rally, we're asking who has the best flipping groundstrokes in history. the fact that he has to be in form to "keep up" in forehand rallies with federer suggests federer has a far better forehand. it doesn't put him in contention for best groundstrokes ever either. great player to watch, but he's nowhere in the history of the greats.
let's get safin out of there as well. "when on" means what? two matches in his life? not enough.
Never disagreed here, Nalbandian doesn't have the results to be an objective choice for best ground-strokes of all time, but that doesn't change the fact that his forehand is probably rather underrated than overrated.
Andre, when you look at pure groundies- power, consistent, accurate, reliable- was/is best, cleanest ball striker on men's side of all time.
And Lindsay Davenport, the same on the women's side.
Now this has to nothing to do with movement, which incidentally was both aforementioned players' weakness IMO.
Hypothetically, Agassi and Davenport with supreme mobility on the court would be nearly unbeatable IMO.
My $.02
Absolutely, his backhand made Nadal's forehand look average 3 times, so it's not surprising that his own forehand doesn't look too impressive compared to it.Agree. And the reason why Nalbandian`s forehand is underrated..well, take a look at his backhand! Thats why.
Two out of three ain't bad.Agassi Federer and Lendl
Questions like this need clarification. What do you mean by "best"? Biggest? Most efficient? Least error-prone? At least the serve is relatively straightforward, groundstrokes are not.
I can't believe nobody has metioned Marcelo Rios. He didn't care about tennis, and still got to number 1.
Nalbandian is not overrated, much less the most overrated on these boards. He results are just not on par with his tennis abilities.
Two out of three ain't bad.
A year ago, I would have agreed with you on all three, but somebody here pointed out that Rajah shanks and mishits a fair amount of groundstrokes. I started comparing him to his opponents and he does do it more than inferior opponents.
Lendl's constant power is forgotten nowadays.
Rios is way overrated. He was an underachiever I would agree, but it is not like he did that well anyway, so it isnt as if he would have had this fabulous career even if he had maxed out his so called potential. He only made it past the quarters of a slam once, where he was embarassed by a 30 year old Petr Korda in his 2nd and final slam final. He didnt care about tennis? That is simply not true as he would not have kept trying to come back from all those injuries if he didnt. More significantly perhaps he would not have played the Champions tour regularly when unable to compete at the pro level effectively anymore. People that dont care about tennis dont continue with it when their pro careers are over.
Safin cared about tennis alot less than Rios and still achieved alot more. Nalbandian also cares about tennis less than Rios and has achieved a bit more.
Exactly.Thanx I guess.
Although its a matter of opinions right ?
Federer's backhand isnt strong enough to say he had the best groundstrokes of all time. My choice would be one of the following:
Nadal
Borg
Laver
Rosewall