Who has the best record in wimbledon finals Federer or Sampras

[Amy Foster]

A tough question Federer is 8-3 in Wimbledon finals Sampras is 7-0 which record in finals is the better ?

 

[tennisaddict]

Sampras.

 

[Im(moral) Winner]

9-3

 

[Otacon]

7-100 will always be better than 7-0, just sayin'.

 

[FHtennisman]

9-3

 

[Mustard]

How is it a tough question? Federer has won more Wimbledons than Sampras and been in more finals overall, so Federer is the most successful.

 

[Deleted member 688153]

What do you mean by "record"?
If you mean winning %, it's obviously Sampras.

If you mean which is the more impressive record, then anyone who tells you it isn't Federer is kidding themselves. Making three extra finals is obviously better than losing earlier.

 

[Tennisanity]

Krajicek

 

[Mustard]

9-3

9-3

Have you two got into a time and relative dimension in space machine and travelled 8 days into the future, or something?

 

[Deleted member 688153]

How is it a tough question? Federer has won more Wimbledons than Sampras and been in more finals overall, so Federer is the most successful.

I suspect OP is just posting bait as usual

 

[parvasedpotens]

8 and 10 is better than 8 and 1...which is better than 7 and 0.

 

[Im(moral) Winner]

Have you two got into a time and relative dimension in space machine and travelled 8 days into the future, or something?

All according to keikaku.

 

[FHtennisman]

Nothing wrong with a bit of sarcasm .

OT, Fed's comfortably the greater Wimby Final's player and has been incredibly unlucky to bump into peak Novak when well past his prime.