Waterwater
New User
Wawrinka has an equally big weakness in his ROS
Stan didn’t have problem returning Andy’s serve in 2011 AO though
Wawrinka has an equally big weakness in his ROS
I wouldn't be so sure about that. I could see Roddick beating 2016 USO Djokovic if he brings a great level.Roddick would probably have no slams in Wawrinka's place. This is an unfair argument against both guys. Better just to evaluate their levels and their accomplishment.
2011 Roddick was one foot in retirement though.Stan didn’t have problem returning Andy’s serve in 2011 AO though
Fixed it for you.Avg. Roddick might be better than avg. Wawrinka, but peak Wawrinka might be GOAT-level.
Peak Wawrinka beats Djokovic
Roddick literally retired the next year. He was well on his way into retirement at that point.Stan didn’t have problem returning Andy’s serve in 2011 AO though
2011 Roddick was one foot in retirement though.
Post 2010 Sunshine Double was the beginning of the end for Roddick.Roddick just made the final at a tuneup tournament before AO. He was the No 8 seed at AO and that meeting was a 4th round so it’s not like Andy was playing bad stuff up until that point. Andy was still only 29 years old then. So he lost to Stan on the longevity front too
See plenty of underrating of him here as well.Wawa.
Rodick is overhyped here, and was back then by US media.
Almost certainly. Is there truth to it? Hmmm.....People keep overrating Roddick when he had more or less Juan Carlos Ferrero's career.
I don't get it. Is it because he was the last American hope?
Name | Overall Record W | Overall Record L | Winning % | Titles | Number of GS QF/SF/F | Number of GS SF/F | Number of GS Finals | Year End Final SF/F | Year End Finals Appearence | Year End Final Victories | ATP Master 1000 Finals | ATP Masters 1000 Victories |
Player A | 612 | 213 | 74.18% | 32 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 |
Player B | 662 | 312 | 67.97% | 34 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 7 |
Player C | 439 | 173 | 71.73% | 22 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
Player D | 575 | 319 | 64.32% | 20 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
Player E | 534 | 230 | 69.90% | 26 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 4 |
Player F | 479 | 262 | 64.64% | 16 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 |
Everyone suddenly gets injured when they meet a redlining Stanimal in a Slam final.Add the fact that Wawrinka played injured opponents in 2 of those 3 finals.
Wawrinka won his 3 major titles against Djokovic and Nadal, 2 GOAT candidates, when they were in top2 and prohibitive favorites against him. Roddick won his lone major against JC Ferrero.
And there were people disagreeing with me when I said Wawrinka had a much higher ceiling!
Everyone suddenly gets injured when they meet a redlining Stanimal in a Slam final.![]()
How can Stan be overrated considering he's beaten Djokovic 4 times in Slams?Both are so overrated in the last few months and this thread is such a good example.
The poll is very wide in his favour. And he doesn’t do so well vs Fedal or Djokovic outside slams even though 4-4 vs Djoker is something to be highly impressive.How can Stan be overrated considering he's beaten Djokovic 4 times in Slams?
Wait a minute! I didn't even mention yet that Stan has won 3 Grand Slams.The poll is very wide in his favour. And he doesn’t do so well vs Fedal or Djokovic outside slams even though 4-4 vs Djoker is something to be highly impressive.
Djokovic USO 15 >> Djokovic USO 16 when Stan beat him imo. I would pick Djokovic in 4/5. Stan was lesser than in RG anyway.Wait a minute! I didn't even mention yet that Stan has won 3 Grand Slams.
And if not for Federer in the SF, he probably would've gone and thrashed Djokovic in the 2015 US Open final. So it should be Stan having 4 Grand Slams to his name.
Wawrinka won 3 slams beating 5 times the Big3.
Roddick none.
About even.
Stan won two more slams because he faced Novak Djokovic, as opposed to Roddick who faced Federer.
Pretty sure Stan also faced someone called Rafa Nadal. And didn't Stan also face Federer himself?
Roddick has most likely played a better Federer but the rest is correct.Wawrinka played more matches than Roddick
against Federer: 26 vs 24
against Djokovic: 25 vs 9
against Nadal: 22 vs 10
against Murray: 20 vs 12
Total: 93 vs 55
Where does this belief that he had it easier and he doesn't deserve his 3 slams come from?![]()
But to get to that Rafa, Stan went through Djokovic.Pretty sure Stan also faced someone called Rafa Nadal. And didn't Stan also face Federer himself?
That is far better than 40-15.44-6 ouch.
Remains the most fully accurate comment in the whole threadRoddick better on grass and faster HC, Wawrinka better on clay and slow HC.
Remains the most fully accurate comment in the whole thread![]()
God, that match was painful to watch.Roddick getting passed in the he poll worse than his net approaches against Nadal at the USO in 2011.
That's the weird thing. Stan is only 3 years younger than Roddick and the 2 have barely played each other. Out of their 4 matches, 2 of them were not even completed first sets, let alone matches and their other 2 had expected winners: Roddick won in 2009 when Stan was not Stanimal yet and Stan won in 2011 when Roddick was one foot in retirement.at their best i think the roddick serve v wawrinka return gives andy the edge.
It is too much votes difference but oh well.Roddick getting passed in the he poll worse than his net approaches against Nadal at the USO in 2011.
2020 Thiem > 2008 Nadal because of the improving games ?Remember, Roddick in 2012 said the Big4 were too strong for him, and 1 year later Wawrinka started beating the Big4.
If that's not an admission that Roddick is inferior to Wawrinka I don't know what that is.
Maybe he could beat him, but Roddick didn't say that.2020 Thiem > 2008 Nadal because of the improving games ?
But do you think it based on the game getting better?Maybe he could beat him, but Roddick didn't say that.
Well, to be fair, Stan was also unable to beat Roddick's best player of his decade.Is this whole thread a proxy fight between Federer and Djokovic fans about whose ‘weak era’ in their prime was not so weak? Are Fed fans in general stating that Roddick is better and Djokovic fans voting for Wawrinka?
Hard to argue against Wawrinka who is a 3-time Slam winner at 3 different Slams who out-hit the best player of the decade and world#1 off the court from both wings in each of his Slam wins.
Roddick‘s style of play (big serve, big FH and not much else) has been cited by many as the model for why US tennis has declined on the ATP tour. He certainly was unable to beat the best player of his decade when it counted.
I begrudgingly will admit that 2012 Roddick is worse than peak Wawrinka. You really got me there Lew.Remember, Roddick in 2012 said the Big4 were too strong for him, and 1 year later Wawrinka started beating the Big4.
If that's not an admission that Roddick is inferior to Wawrinka I don't know what that is.