Watcher said:What does what experts predict have to do with anything? "Experts" thought that Donald Young would beat Giorgio whatshislastname in the US Open round one last year.
Shamo said:most of the year he was a nobody himself!
and the favourite in the french open match was for many experts and nadal himself federer
In fact it was even not sure and that after nadal had a 59 match streak on clay
The Pusher Terminator said:NADAL 6 AND FED 2...this is not a tough decision guys.
simi said:BLAKE 2 AND NADAL 0 ... yup, not a tough decision at all.
Rabbit said:Nads 2 Grand Slam Titles and Fed 8.....I don't know, the plot thickens....
crazylevity said:Does anyone here take Brad Gilbert seriously?
They take him so seriously that they dumped him... , and it won't take more than 1 or 2 years for Murray to do so...The Pusher Terminator said:ANDRE AGASSI, ANDY RODDICK ...
The Pusher Terminator said:I would have to admit that Blake is definitely the player on hard courts this year...but not on Clay or grass.
dandy2fast said:Give us a break!
How many slams on hardcourts for blake in 2006? 0/1
How many slams on hardcourts for Federer in 2006? 1/1
How many master series won on hard for blake in 2006? 0/2
How many master series won on hard for Federer in 2006? 2/2
Do you want to insist about Blake beeing the player of the year on hardcourts? Or do I have to remind you the Blake Vs Federer head to heads?
The Pusher Terminator said:fed has had more time....what do you want Nadal to do? Would you have him turn pro at 12??
Federer has slams on two different surfaces. So far Nadal has only proven himself a champion on one surface.The Pusher Terminator said:fed has had more time....what do you want Nadal to do? Would you have him turn pro at 12??
The Pusher Terminator said:There is no need to debate because the US open will decide who is the better player this year once and for all
The Pusher Terminator said:Brad Gilbert says Nadal is better than Fed. Check out his rankings:
http://www.bradgilberttennis.com/index2.html
scroll down to: "scaps rankings"
Shamo said:WTF??? where exactly does he say nadal is better than federer????
this ranking is based on improvment and actual achievement of a player and because nadal at that moment played his best tennis his up there and federer played like always.
also this ranking wasn't updated since after the french so stop with your false facts, like when you said tracy austin said nadal is all-courter without any source that proves that, fanboy
The Pusher Terminator said:it says Nadal #1 and Fed #2...to me that means that Nadal is better.
The Pusher Terminator said:Finally are you fat or something? Why did you name yourself after a whale?
Shamo said:Is your girlfriend named shamo else I don't know why you would talk of a whale????
The Pusher Terminator said:Secondly I already proved Tracy Austins statement...
The Pusher Terminator said:Havnt you ever heard of shamo the whale? Why do you use that tag?
crazylevity said:Does anyone here take Brad Gilbert seriously?
dandy2fast said:They take him so seriously that they dumped him... , and it won't take more than 1 or 2 years for Murray to do so...
The Pusher Terminator said:ANDRE AGASSI, ANDY RODDICK AND NOW MURRAY AND ENGLAND
Are you freaking kidding me? Look these are the facts
Andre Agassi pre Gilbert...not even in the to 30 I believe.
Agassi with Gilbert: French Open winner and #1 in the world
Agassi Post Gilbert: Not even in the top 10 and no grand slams since the French
Roddick Pre Gilbert: No grand slams
Roddick w/Gilbert... US open, #1 in the world & 2 wimby Finals losing only to Fed
Roddick post Gilbert: Not even in the top 10
You better take Gilbert seriously
Breaker said:Roddick didn't get to any Wimbledon finals with Gilbert and is in the top 10 atm, and I think Agassi racked up a few more slams too if I'm not mistaken.
Breaker said:Yep my bad I thought he fired him at the end of 03 but it was indeed the end of 04. Gilbert may be a coaching genius and understands how to play the game well but sometimes I think he just talks for the sake of hearing himself talk, if he can take Murray to the top then I'll respect and listen to every word the man says. Until then it's hard to take him seriously because of some of the outlandish claims he makes in his commentating. For example,
"Andy is takin' Murray to da woodshed today!"
"I can feel it, here comes the break, a breeze over my left shoulder is telling me"
"And when I coached Roddick..."
"Oh yeah and when I coached Agassi"
He may be a great coach and ok analyst but sometimes he talks WAY too much.
crazylevity said:Isn't the whale Shamu? not Shamo?
Marat Safinator said:Federer is no.1, nadal is no.2. simple