Who is the most frustrating player to play against?

Most frustrating player to play against


  • Total voters
    125
Its a combination ..however voted karlovic because you struggle to get breakpoints and he serves a bomb to snuff it out
My combo is
Karlovic for his huge serve ....
Nadal for his retrieving ability and ability to convert defence to offense...
Santoro for his unpredictable shot making...
 
I can't believe no one has mentioned Stepanek. The guy's sneeky quick, hits a flat ball thats tougher to get under, mixes up spins and pace, he used to act like a cartoon but has gotten a bit better of late, and his face is......just plain distracting.
 
I wouldn't know as I've never played against any of them.

Saying that, it would depend a lot on your style of play and how you match up to your opponent, for example, Nadal isn't really a frustrating match for Del Potro as he is quite tall so Nadal's topspin sits up nicely for him.
 
You cant compare RG with other slams (in Federers case). That GS was way too important for him. He just couldnt resist and took the easy way out by breaking Del Potro's momentum.
And about Davy, he never stood a chance against Federer. Everyone knew he was gonna lose no matter how good he was playing. But Del potro on the other hand has prooved himself by beating Federer in the US open finals.

Easy way out? Outlasting DP in a 5-setter with massive baseline rallies and huge serving is in now way, shape or form easy. Federer was better that day and that's the end of it.
 
Easy way out? Outlasting DP in a 5-setter with massive baseline rallies and huge serving is in now way, shape or form easy. Federer was better that day and that's the end of it.

I totally agree......:(
 
Nadal. He's very hard to hit through. He refuses to play in any rythm other than his own. He also takes his sweet time in every point, making it harder for the opponent to keep any kind of streak. He's a lefty and his strokes feel weird. He plays every point as if it was a match point. He forces you to take the ball early. He'd be a total pain in the arse to play against, I reckon.
 
Last edited:
Nalbandian (type of player)

First of all, he has a good first serve. It isnt very good, but he doesnt miss many of them so he's guaranteed to almost always start the rally with him being in the offensive position. He's groundstrokes are soo good that he can go crosscourt or down the line equally well on both wings. He has a good return of service to place him in an offensive position. In almost every rally, with his ability to change the pace and direction of the ball, you are constantly moving.

Secondly, nearly every match he plays goes to a 5 setter. He may be up 2-0 sets and then let you come back with 2 straight sets only for him to win 10-8 in the 5th will dishearten anyone. He seems cranky mentally and you may think the momentum has changed but he usually pulls out the win anyway. The amount he sweats is insane and he always looks like he's about faulter physically but he's still battling it out in the 5th set to win it. He looks out of shape yet he never craps and probably rarely retires in a match. Might I also add that he has insanely good footwork his 'size'. Recently isnt valid because of his injuries. So you are up 2 sets to 0 and he's moaning and groaning, yet some how, 2 hours later, you lose in 5. Hell, you could be out there for 2 hours only to lose 6-3, 6-2.

He hits the ball early off the ground so that you dont have much time to rest, yet he doesnt have that 'kill' shot to consistently hit winners like federer or nadal, therefore, you'll be running even more, thinking you can rally back to win the point.

You put him on defense and what does he do? He either slows the pace down so much that you cant generate your own pace to hit winners or he just lets it go only to make you grind the next point, and subsequently have him win the following point.

He's like Davydenko but with the ability to pull out a tight match. He's kinda like Agassi except he doesnt blow you off the court as much as Andre. And he has the talents of a Federer or Safin to boot.

Oh, did I mention? He also has his drop shot and lob/passing shot to break up the long rallies and make you run vertically, not just horizontally.
 
Last edited:
Nadal, because of his spin and ability to just hit a banna shot when rushing the net. Also, Federer is a great choice because he's Federer. Davydenko Backhand is amazing.
 
i think it's nadal because of his insane returns and impossible winners .. and because he gives the impression that he's beatable ..

federer when he's in a good day is simply unbeatable .
 
Easy way out? Outlasting DP in a 5-setter with massive baseline rallies and huge serving is in now way, shape or form easy. Federer was better that day and that's the end of it.

Del Potro should have won in 4 sets, but guess who left? :twisted:
Federers FO win left many questionmarks behind and thats why hes still not considered as the Goat yet.
None of the top 4 wer in the semis and none of the claycourt specialist wer in the finals....


I totally agree......:(
shut up ATLANTIS
 
Del Potro should have won in 4 sets, but guess who left? :twisted:
Federers FO win left many questionmarks behind and thats why hes still not considered as the Goat yet.
None of the top 4 wer in the semis and none of the claycourt specialist wer in the finals....



shut up ATLANTIS

Fed won RG fair and square. It's obvious you hate Fed for some reason and it's OK, but blaming his need to pee for other players' losses is idiotic.
 
Nalbandian (type of player)

First of all, he has a good first serve. It isnt very good, but he doesnt miss many of them so he's guaranteed to almost always start the rally with him being in the offensive position. He's groundstrokes are soo good that he can go crosscourt or down the line equally well on both wings. He has a good return of service to place him in an offensive position. In almost every rally, with his ability to change the pace and direction of the ball, you are constantly moving.

Secondly, nearly every match he plays goes to a 5 setter. He may be up 2-0 sets and then let you come back with 2 straight sets only for him to win 10-8 in the 5th will dishearten anyone. He seems cranky mentally and you may think the momentum has changed but he usually pulls out the win anyway. The amount he sweats is insane and he always looks like he's about faulter physically but he's still battling it out in the 5th set to win it. He looks out of shape yet he never craps and probably rarely retires in a match. Might I also add that he has insanely good footwork his 'size'. Recently isnt valid because of his injuries. So you are up 2 sets to 0 and he's moaning and groaning, yet some how, 2 hours later, you lose in 5. Hell, you could be out there for 2 hours only to lose 6-3, 6-2.

He hits the ball early off the ground so that you dont have much time to rest, yet he doesnt have that 'kill' shot to consistently hit winners like federer or nadal, therefore, you'll be running even more, thinking you can rally back to win the point.

You put him on defense and what does he do? He either slows the pace down so much that you cant generate your own pace to hit winners or he just lets it go only to make you grind the next point, and subsequently have him win the following point.

He's like Davydenko but with the ability to pull out a tight match. He's kinda like Agassi except he doesnt blow you off the court as much as Andre. And he has the talents of a Federer or Safin to boot.

Oh, did I mention? He also has his drop shot and lob/passing shot to break up the long rallies and make you run vertically, not just horizontally.

This

His wide-angled shots make you look like a fool
 
Fed won RG fair and square. It's obvious you hate Fed for some reason and it's OK, but blaming his need to pee for other players' losses is idiotic.

Hate is a strong word for someone who really loves watching Federer play.
I have a lot of respect for Federer for winning 16 grandslams, making 23 constructive semifinals, and ofcourse his incredible endurance but that doesnt mean I'm rooting for him. I like Djokovic better and if Federer stands in his way il make him look like mine worst enemie :twisted:
 
Last edited:
Hate is a strong word for someone who really loves watching Federer play.
I have a lot of respect for Federer for winning 16 grandslams, making 23 constructive semifinals, and ofcourse his incredible endurance but that doesnt mean I'm rooting for him. I like Djokovic better and if Federer stands in his way il make him look like mine worst enemie :twisted:

Hate Federer for all I care (I don't). But discrediting some of his GS wins because of a bathroom break is idiotic.
 
Hate Federer for all I care (I don't). But discrediting some of his GS wins because of a bathroom break is idiotic.

Its like you didnt even read my post...
If Federer really wants to proove himself he needs to win against the likes of Nadal and Djokovic not against some one time grandslam finalist.
 
Its like you didnt even read my post...
If Federer really wants to proove himself he needs to win against the likes of Nadal and Djokovic not against some one time grandslam finalist.

1) You didn't write anything about Nadal in your post. Read what you write next time before telling others to do the same.
2) Federer has nothing to prove anymore, especially at slams.
3) Federer is 4-1 against Djokovic, so I don't get your point on Djokovic.
 
The thing with Nadal is that no matter how much you attack, you are almost never rewarded. You can dominate a rally, go for brilliant shots, and he'll still get everything back until you make an error or he starts dictating. This is part of the reason I dislike his game, I love to watch attackers get rewarded for their effort and risk taking.

I vote for Rafa as well: Basically my reasons are those you presented..still, to be fair, Rafa was a pure (quite boring) player till his best season, i.e. the '08-beginning of '09 there I was able to appreciate more (some) matches he did play, why? Because he was attacking and going for the shots (there was few matches in which he was even having the double digit UE but at the same time a lot of winners..)..Unfortunately, I really believe at the moment this Rafa is gone and the old (almost all defence one) is back on track ..A shame really..
 
1) You didn't write anything about Nadal in your post. Read what you write next time before telling others to do the same.
2) Federer has nothing to prove anymore, especially at slams.
3) Federer is 4-1 against Djokovic, so I don't get your point on Djokovic.

Federer is the 3rd best claycourt player out there at the moment. The reason why i chose Djokovic above him is because Djokovic has more talent.
At the age 20-22 Federer was invisible at RG. His results wer really disapointing , especially when you look at Djokovic's achiements at the age of 20-22. and in 2009 it was all Nadal-Djokovic show until they killed each other in Madrid. Federer knew that this was his only shot and took adventage of it and let me remind the *******s what happend when Rafa was still around
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ta7DqyFPPA :oops::oops:
A goat who couldnt even win one game against Nadal.
 
Last edited:
Federer is the 3rd best claycourt player out there at the moment. The reason why i chose Djokovic above him is because Djokovic has more talent.
At the age 20-22 Federer was invisible at RG. His results wer really disapointing , especially when you look at Djokovic's achiements at the age of 20-22. and in 2009 it was all Nadal-Djokovic show until they killed each other in Madrid. Federer knew that this was his only shot and took adventage of it and let me remind the *******s what happend when Rafa was still around
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ta7DqyFPPA :oops::oops:
A goat who couldnt even win one game against Nadal.

Djokovic has more talent? more talent than who, Robredo? Federer is 3rd on clay? what are you smoking, Yoda?
 
Djokovic has more talent? more talent than who, Robredo? Federer is 3rd on clay? what are you smoking, Yoda?

Let me guess, you think that Federer is better because he made 4 RG finals. The only reason why Djokovic hasnt made any finals is because he always draws Nadal. (4 times in a row!!!!) Federer must be the luckiest tennis player alive.
 
Back
Top