Alcaraz won Wimbledon against a healthy version of the most solid grass player ever, denying him a CYGS, and was 20 when he did it.Well at this point it's obviously Sinner... Alcatraz proving to be too limited and vulnerable. Sinner will always be rock solid with the improved serve.
Also Sinner is kind of mini Djokovic and Alcaraz mini Federer. But Alcaraz doesn't have near the Federer talent and it's much harder to be successful with their playstyle than rock solid consistent Sinner/Djokovic kind
In the wind against the robot who hates unstable conditions (same thing with daytime AO)... when himself alcaraz specializes in wind.Alcaraz won Wimbledon against a healthy version of the most solid grass player ever, denying him a CYGS, and was 20 when he did it.
Limited and vulnerable.
In the wind against the robot who hates unstable conditions (same thing with daytime AO)... when himself alcaraz specializes in wind.
And since then just been on a roll of losing nonstop exposed for the limited and vulnerable he is
He said in interview he likes playing in wind and thinks he's abnormally good at itAlcaraz specializes in wind, since when?
He said in interview he likes playing in wind and thinks he's abnormally good at it
I'm sure he knows himself better than some guy on ttw lmfaoWell I disagree with him, he didn't handle it well at Indian Wells vs. Nadal. Although that was extreme wind, maybe he means moderate wind.
I'm sure he knows himself better than some guy on ttw lmfao
That's not a prediction it's him knowing his own play in various conditions which pros know themselves extremely well in that regardI never really understood this notion. Athletes have never proven to be better predictors than the general public, whether regarding themselves or their fellow players. Most 'expert' predictions from pros or former pros turn out to be laughably wrong. I read better analysis on TTW than I ever would from following the top "experts."
I've seen Alcaraz struggle with the wind, so I disagree with his take, and the evidence favors me.
That's not a prediction it's him knowing his own play in various conditions which pros know themselves extremely well in that regard
I am baffled that alcaraz is dominating the pollSon, you're still asking this question? seriously!
I am baffled that alcaraz is dominating the poll
https://theracquet.substack.com/p/airbending-in-the-desert (TL;DR he wasn't; he was error-prone in the first and non-windy set)Then why was he so error-prone in the wind at Indian Wells?
Not to mention sinner has the closest to the djokovic style which got the most resultssinner has the best coach
alcarazs coach didnt even show up
sinner uses a professional spec racket
alcaraz uses the same racket people at the park play with
Lol perfecthttps://theracquet.substack.com/p/airbending-in-the-desert (TL;DR he wasn't; he was error-prone in the first and non-windy set)
https://theracquet.substack.com/p/airbending-in-the-desert (TL;DR he wasn't; he was error-prone in the first and non-windy set)
Lol perfect
yeah i misremembered the progression. seems like it was average IW wind in first set, to heavy mid way through first, to super heavy mid way through second. wouldn't say the article is totally incorrect - Alcaraz adjusting his play from the 1st set and playing better than Nadal in the 2nd set, with the heavier wind, should probably be recognized and weighed at least as much as his sloppier start. sure, maybe it could have done without implying the other sets weren't windy. anyway, think my point about him not being particularly error-prone in the wind still stands considering your original focus:There was a lot of wind in the first set. The article is totally incorrect - it went to a comical level of wind in set 2, but was certainly present in set 1.
he didn't handle it well at Indian Wells vs. Nadal. Although that was extreme wind, maybe he means moderate wind.
yeah i misremembered the progression. seems like it was average IW wind in first set, to heavy mid way through first, to super heavy mid way through second. wouldn't say the article is totally incorrect - Alcaraz adjusting his play from the 1st set and playing better than Nadal in the 2nd set, with the heavier wind, should probably be recognized and weighed at least as much as his sloppier start. sure, maybe it could have done without implying the other sets weren't windy. anyway, think my point about him not being particularly error-prone in the wind still stands considering your original focus:
I kind of agree.Well at this point it's obviously Sinner... Alcatraz proving to be too limited and vulnerable. Sinner will always be rock solid with the improved serve.
Also Sinner is kind of mini Djokovic and Alcaraz mini Federer. But Alcaraz doesn't have near the Federer talent and it's much harder to be successful with their playstyle than rock solid consistent Sinner/Djokovic kind
Ah yea it's easy to forget this is just hard court where Sinner is clearly superiorAt this point it’s quite equal tbh. Sinner ofcourse has become a super solid player, while Alcaraz is also improving YoY. His 2023 was better than 2022 which was better than 2021.
Same goes with Sinner in YoY development so far.
We don’t - where they plateau eventually. Both are work in progress.
Sinner has to still improve quite a lot on natural surfaces I believe and Alcaraz has quite a few areas of improvement himself - notably his backhand and point construction.
So it's surprising to see Alcaraz's big lead in the poll. Sinner hasn't proven yet that he will win many slams. Djokovic played one of the worst matches of his career, but Sinner still lost the only competitive set to him. Medvedev was very tired, but he still managed to lose 2 sets to him and brought the score to 4:4 deuce on his serve in the 3rd set. Before that, he lost YEC final without a chance in front of the home crowd.By TTW logic Sinner, because he won last slam. In reality, nobody knows for now.
Nadal and Federer in windy conditions are both insane. I remember Nadal absolutely slaughtering Murray in horrible winds at IW one year.That's fair. The bottom line is, it was a messy match that was basically ruined by the wind in terms of quality. The time I saw Alcaraz play in wind, it's not as though he proved to be particularly adept, he lost, so based on that, I'm not impressed by his wind prowess.
8 would be realistic.Sinner will win 10 slams this year.
I agree. Alcaraz doesn’t like windy conditions either. It just Djokovic hates them more. Alcaraz is error prone even on good day but that’s made much worse in windy conditions.Then why was he so error-prone in the wind at Indian Wells?
Alcaraz has won most matches with extreme wind involved, he won indian Wells, he got to the finals of cincinatti beating Tommy Paul in a match where the ball was doing crazy crazy things, to say that he isnt a a good wind player says that you havent watched enough of himI agree. Alcaraz doesn’t like windy conditions either. It just Djokovic hates them more. Alcaraz is error prone even on good day but that’s made much worse in windy conditions.
Don’t forget the Masterclass he put on against Soderling at the 2010 U.S. Open when the wind was ridiculous:Nadal and Federer in windy conditions are both insane. I remember Nadal absolutely slaughtering Murray in horrible winds at IW one year.
And Federer even as an older guy on his worst surface can hang with almost anyone in horribly windy conditions. The RG match he played against Rafa in 2019…. Obviously not peak Rafa by any means but that match was played in horrible conditions and it was amazing how well even Older Federer’s high risk game held up in that weather.
Players were repeatedly having to re-toss after gusts blew the ball out of their reach when they were about to serve. Just landing the ball on the court became an achievement.
It lent itself to some comical moments but for tennis purists, it was a day to forget. The only consolation was that Mother Nature did not claim any victims and the four favorites all won easily.
Federer alone seemed unaffected by the conditions, thumping 18 aces past a bewildered Soderling. The fifth seed ended a run of 12 straight losses to Federer when he beat him at Roland Garros in June but normal service resumed on the hardcourts of New York.
US Open is a good example because of how swirly it gets.Don’t forget the Masterclass he put on against Soderling at the 2010 U.S. Open when the wind was ridiculous:
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6880F8/
A timely reminder that in by-age terms Carlitos Alcaraz is a complete freak.It's important to remember that Jannik is 2 years ahead of Charlos in development.
I am going to stick with my guy here, he is still the One from this generation to me. However, I believe Jannik is capable of winning double digit Slams as well.