dking68
G.O.A.T.
Sinner had an injury laden year and he threw away a French open final and also this USO. Also I think he will do better next yearDelpo definitely showed more at 20-21 than Sinner has so far.
Sinner had an injury laden year and he threw away a French open final and also this USO. Also I think he will do better next yearDelpo definitely showed more at 20-21 than Sinner has so far.
Also pushed the three time defending Wimbledon champion to the limit, he will do better next year. Potro wasn’t good on 3 surfaces like Sinner was so I still see him as a better prospectDelpo definitely showed more at 20-21 than Sinner has so far.
Wouldn't say pushed him to the limit. Guy didn't put up any resistance in the final 3 sets.Also pushed the three time defending Wimbledon champion to the limit, he will do better next year. Potro wasn’t good on 3 surfaces like Sinner was so I still see him as a better prospect
So what did you expect from a guy who hasn’t played 10 grass matches in his career? He did damn good for his inexperience. Think it’s easy to take out a six time Wimbledon champion (now 7) without playing 10 matches on a surface?Wouldn't say pushed him to the limit. Guy didn't put up any resistance in the final 3 sets.
To put up better resistance. So what? After winning the first 2 sets, he suddenly forgot how to play on grass?So what did you expect from a guy who hasn’t played 10 grass matches in his career? He did damn good for his inexperience. Think it’s easy to take out a six time Wimbledon champion without playing 10 matches on a surface?
Man you’re such garbage man. The dude can’t just take out a multiple Wimbledon champion like thatTo put up better resistance. So what? After winning the first 2 sets, he suddenly forgot how to play on grass?
Why don’t you go out on Wimbledon center court and take out Djokovic? Someone who played hundreds of matches, been in high pressure situations, nobody expected Sinner to gon5 with himTo put up better resistance. So what? After winning the first 2 sets, he suddenly forgot how to play on grass?
Federer did.Man you’re such garbage man. The dude can’t just take out a multiple Wimbledon champion like that
Okay and so? Did Djokovic take out Federer en route to his first WB Title?Federer did.
No, but just saying that it is possible to beat a multiple Wimb champion while being very inexperienced. Federer did in 2001.Okay and so? Did Djokovic take out Federer en route to his first WB Title?
Federer was experienced on grass. He had a level of pedigree as he was the Junior WB champ in 98. Sinner didn’t play Juniors, had no grass level, he came into Wimbledon without winning a single match on grass. Stop the comparisons and enjoy tennis. What you achieve at 19/20/21 doesn’t matter, it’s how you finish.No, but just saying that it is possible to beat a multiple Wimb champion while being very inexperienced. Federer did in 2001.
And yet you’re bashing him for losing to Djokovic in 5 and the dude hadn’t won A SINGLE MATCH ON GRASSNo, but just saying that it is possible to beat a multiple Wimb champion while being very inexperienced. Federer did in 2001.
I'd say the way Delpo played at the French and USO in 2009 easily overrides Sinner's more completeness on all 3 surfaces.Also pushed the three time defending Wimbledon champion to the limit, he will do better next year. Potro wasn’t good on 3 surfaces like Sinner was so I still see him as a better prospect
How long it took him to get to a QF at Wimbledon??I'd say the way Delpo played at the French and USO in 2009 easily overrides Sinner's more completeness on all 3 surfaces.
What does that have to do with what I said?And yet you’re bashing him for losing to Djokovic in 5 and the dude hadn’t won A SINGLE MATCH ON GRASS
Man you’re such an idiot it’s laughable. It took delpo 25 years to get to a SF at WB, while it took Sinner 20 years to get to a WB QF. I’m sure by time Sinner gets to 25, he’ll be near complete the 4 slams if not all 4I'd say the way Delpo played at the French and USO in 2009 easily overrides Sinner's more completeness on all 3 surfaces.
I'd say winning a slam and being very close to win a second overrides that, don't you think?How long it took him to get to a QF at Wimbledon??
So what if Sinner didn’t have the injury nags earlier this year and made a French open final and coneverted the MP against alcaraz? HuhI'd say winning a slam and being very close to win a second overrides that, don't you think?
I’ll come back to this when Sinner achieves more than what Delpo achieves his whole entire career at the end of 23’I'd say winning a slam and being very close to win a second overrides that, don't you think?
Sinner performed decently this year, but Delpo was better at his age. It's not rocket science.So what if Sinner didn’t have the injury nags earlier this year and made a French open final and coneverted the MP against alcaraz? Huh
Since you brought up injuries, I'm sure you're well aware of Delpo's history with them.I’ll come back to this when Sinner achieves more than what Delpo achieves his whole entire career at the end of 23’
Okay and what if Sinner surpasses Delpos 30 year career at the end of 23’?Sinner performed decently this year, but Delpo was better at his age. It's not rocket science.
On all surfaces? I don’t think so. Sinner is the youngest player since big 3 to make second week at all slams. Delpo never achieved that until 24Sinner performed decently this year, but Delpo was better at his age. It's not rocket science.
Just the fact you call a player "midget" makes me want to stop discusssing
If he avoids injuries, sure. Delpo spent half of his career injured.Okay and what if Sinner surpasses Delpos 30 year career at the end of 23’?
I know and that's a point for Sinner. But he wasn't as close to a slam title as Delpo, which is what matters more.On all surfaces? I don’t think so. Sinner is the youngest player since big 3 to make second week at all slams. Delpo never achieved that until 24
Point I’m trying to make, doesn’t matter what you achieve at 20/21 etc, it’s how you endIf he avoids injuries, sure. Delpo spent half of his career injured.
Anyways I’m not arguing anymore. When sinner hangs up the rackets when it’s all said and done, Sinner will laugh at delpos careerI know and that's a point for Sinner. But he wasn't as close to a slam title as Delpo, which is what matters more.
Curious: why do you always reply twice to my same pot every time?Anyways I’m not arguing anymore. When sinner hangs up the rackets when it’s all said and done, Sinner will laugh at delpos career
True, did I even argue that? I just said Delpo was better at 20-21 than Sinner which is a fact.Point I’m trying to make, doesn’t matter what you achieve at 20/21 etc, it’s how you end
And so what if Sinner will be better at 21-22, like how Federer was? It’s how it ends, the point I’m trying to makeTrue, did I even argue that? I just said Delpo was better at 20-21 than Sinner which is a fact.
The dude started playing competitive tennis only 8 years ago, how long has Alcaraz been playing? Who is more physically developed out of the two? Name two things apart from the serve and focus that Alcaraz can improve?Fact is theres not a single thing that sugests that sinner will have a better career, he is definetly not more talented and has achieved a lot less being a year older, plus alcaraz is more complete, he has many ways to win matches, the moment sinner is not working from the baseline he doesnt have much more, he is improving tough, but alcaraz is not gonna get any worse either, first full year on tour and 5 titles and a slam (he can win more titles yet) also he is number one and will have easier draws now, we hadnt seen that in a lot of time
Alcaraz can improve everything, its nosense to think otherwise, also, you say sinner has been playing since not long ago, ok, what makes you think he can catch up for the time he wasnt playing? He is not gonna train more ghan alcaraz, and alcaraz is almost two years younger, look, its okey that you preffer sinner, but you argjments are weak, ive been watching A LOT of matches from both in the last years, i know where their games stand, sinner is great, great groundstrokes and big potential, but alcaraz is something i hadnt seen since nadal, and more complete, not such surface oriented since the begining, the sky is the limit for alcaraz, the fact that he is so complete doesnt mean he cant improve, doesnt work that way, the guy hasnt really even put his game together and is youngest number one with 2 masters and slam in first season, sinner hasnt proved really anything, he is improving steady but doesnt put great performances together day in day out, thats why he barely has titles, alcaraz has been able to do that from the get go, to think that he is not gonna get better having such an arsenal is really a misjudgementThe dude started playing competitive tennis only 8 years ago, how long has Alcaraz been playing? Who is more physically developed out of the two? Name two things apart from the serve and focus that Alcaraz can improve?
Alright imma come back to this when he blows this midget off the court in 23’. Being 5’4, he will lift many runner up dishes on a fast surfaceAlcaraz can improve everything, its nosense to think otherwise, also, you say sinner has been playing since not long ago, ok, what makes you think he can catch up for the time he wasnt playing? He is not gonna train more ghan alcaraz, and alcaraz is almost two years younger, look, its okey that you preffer sinner, but you argjments are weak, ive been watching A LOT of matches from both in the last years, i know where their games stand, sinner is great, great groundstrokes and big potential, but alcaraz is something i hadnt seen since nadal, and more complete, not such surface oriented since the begining, the sky is the limit for alcaraz, the fact that he is so complete doesnt mean he cant improve, doesnt work that way, the guy hasnt really even put his game together and is youngest number one with 2 masters and slam in first season, sinner hasnt proved really anything, he is improving steady but doesnt put great performances together day in day out, thats why he barely has titles, alcaraz has been able to do that from the get go, to think that he is not gonna get better having such an arsenal is really a misjudgement
Ok, at the moment is him who has been blown out the court from a slam quarter and been surpased months ago in titles and in ranking by a younger guy, now alcaraz is number one, you can even come back when he wins his first masters 1000, that would be an improvement, until then, im gonna enjoy a lot watching carlos play, i hope you enjoy your baseline rallies and mental blowoutsAlright imma come back to this when he blows this midget off the court in 23’
What happened to the three delicious breadsticks at Umag And Wimbledon? Sinner had a match point on him at USO, he barely won his match while Sinner beat him twice and beat him convincingly on his best surface too! The midget didn’t have a chance against him those two times and he played Sinner being tired after 2 5 setters and still struggled to winOk, at the moment is him who has been blown out the court from a slam quarter and been surpased months ago in titles and in ranking by a younger guy, now alcaraz is number one, you can even come back when he wins his first masters 1000, that would be an improvement, until then, im gonna enjoy a lot watching carlos play, i hope you enjoy your baseline rallies and mental blowouts
"Barely beat" haha, yeah man, alcaraz also had match point, only that he made it, thats how it works, he had to serve for the match and had the balls to do it like a champ, sinners game to close the match was lame at best, also, you remember sinners first wimbledon? Compare it to alcaraz... exactly, he went into wimbledon having played 2 pro matches on grass ever, clay isnt alcaraz best surface, but what would you know, 1 uso, 2 masters, 5 titles, number 1, thats how it is, and its like that for a reason, byeWhat happened to the three delicious breadsticks at Umag And Wimbledon? Sinner had a match point on him at USO, he barely won his match while Sinner beat him twice and beat him convincingly on his best surface too! The midget didn’t have a chance against him those two times and he played Sinner being tired after 2 5 setters and still struggled to win
Alcaraz actually played Wimbledon Juniors while sinner didn’t so I don’t get your point"Barely beat" haha, yeah man, alcaraz also had match point, only that he made it, thats how it works, he had to serve for the match and had the balls to do it like a champ, sinners game to close the match was lame at best, also, you remember sinners first wimbledon? Compare it to alcaraz... exactly, he went into wimbledon having played 2 pro matches on grass ever, clay isnt alcaraz best surface, but what would you know, 1 uso, 2 masters, 5 titles, number 1, thats how it is, and its like that for a reason, bye
I can’t wait for Sinner to come into his own and blow this deluded clown off the court"Barely beat" haha, yeah man, alcaraz also had match point, only that he made it, thats how it works, he had to serve for the match and had the balls to do it like a champ, sinners game to close the match was lame at best, also, you remember sinners first wimbledon? Compare it to alcaraz... exactly, he went into wimbledon having played 2 pro matches on grass ever, clay isnt alcaraz best surface, but what would you know, 1 uso, 2 masters, 5 titles, number 1, thats how it is, and its like that for a reason, bye
you better wait on a chairI can’t wait for Sinner to come into his own and blow this deluded clown off the court
Gladlyyou better wait on a chair
Imagine in a few years from now, when the Alcaraz-Sinner gap increases to 6-0 (don’t forget that Alcaraz is 2 years younger) and the fanboys still say this.I can’t wait for Sinner to come into his own and blow this deluded clown off the court
This was a great lineyou better wait on a chair
Aged wellCan't believe 27 people have voted for Sinner when Sinner has done practically nothing in tennis except winning 250?