Commentators are a huge part of the tv tennis experience. This is why I like and dislike some. Who's your fave? Patrick Mcenroe: good for technical/tactical reviews. too many davis cup allusions and self promotion, its gagging. pretty good commentating except when he tries to suck up to people he wants in his team. Mac: good with the technical like his bro. needs to realize this is 2004. you learn a lot of stuff you shouldn't do on the court listening to this guy. mary carrillo/malivai washington: good in repeating the obvious. i don't learn anything from them though. bud collins: just maybe.....why tennis is not the COOLEST sport around. just weird and old and too much nostalgia. get him off my tv! shriver/fernandez: sewing circle anyone? so-so analysis and a whole bunch of estrogen infested babbling. needs to know when to shut up. cool with the tier 2 events. stay away from the slams. chris evert: somehow hingis and kournikova are brought up from all sorts of tangents. good analysis and technical reviews. needs to know when to shut up. has an opinion and sticks to it. navratilova: smart and witty. good analysis. can be a bore.