BorgTheGOAT
Legend
Even Berdych has a better slam H2H against the big three than Murray (16-5). I think we discussed that once and you excluded him because one win against Djokovic was the retirement at Wimbledon 2017. Anywho, all this shows that Murray didn’t do any better against the big three at slams than less successful players (mostly worse), so this is definitely something to hold against him.1.
Murray vs big 3 in slams: 5-20 combined (20%)
Wawa vs big 3 in slams: 6-14 combined (30%) - clearly better
Tsonga vs big 3 in slams: 4-13 combined (23.52%)
Del potro vs big 3 in slams: 4-15 combined (21%)
Agree with all here especially about Newcombe and Murray.2. Courier > Vilas.
and Newk > Murray
Courier was #1 in a tough field for quite some time and won 4 slams. Vilas won 2 full majors RG 77, USO 77. and YEC 74 which can be considered to be a major. Vilas had a great 77, but not 3 years like Courier's 91-93.
Newk is like nearing Becker/Edberg/Wilander level. Above Murray. higher peak level and clearly better mental strength.
Won Wim 70, Wim 71, USO 73. the WCT tour in 74 ( a big deal, somewhat similar to a major).
did win AO 75 (weak field, but beat Connors) and amateur slams in Wim 67 and USO 67.