TimeToPlaySets
Legend
Never understood why people post stuff like this. If I'm trolling, what are you taking the bait? Wouldn't it be smarter to ignore?Definitely trolling, or maybe just clueless?
Last edited:
Never understood why people post stuff like this. If I'm trolling, what are you taking the bait? Wouldn't it be smarter to ignore?Definitely trolling, or maybe just clueless?
How does a small head help control ?
Directional or distance?
I don't see how it affects direction.
You hit it somewhere on the strings.
It should not matter if the area outside of that contact point is 5 inches or 500.
Still don't understand the string deflection assumptions. Let's use a literal trampoline example. Drop a bowling ball into it from 100 feet above. Massive deflection. But, The ball should bounce exactly the same distance every time. Now tighten the trampoline. Now less bounce, but predictable less bounce every time. Both are equally controlled. Deflection has nothing to do with control since the result is identical every time. Predictable means control since the swing will adapt to the amount of deflection.
How does a small head help control ?
Directional or distance?
I don't see how it affects direction.
You hit it somewhere on the strings.
It should not matter if the area outside of that contact point is 5 inches or 500.
Most pros have an extra sweet spot built in to their racquet. The factory pro rooms build pros’ racquets in such a way that they play and feel larger, while still swinging smaller.What are they gaining by giving up a larger sweet spot ?
I did like your question, but then you kept deliberately missing the point in response to the good answers you were given? Presumably deliberately.Never understood why people waste their time and post stuff like this. Don't like my question? Then skip.
If you dropped said bowling ball in the exact center, the ball would bounce straight up. But, if you missed the center the ball would bounce at an angle, and the direction of the angle would change depending on which direction you missed the center. In the case of a tennis racquet, the more string bed deflection, the greater this 'off angle' is (this is physics, not my opinion). Now, assuming that you cannot create the situation where you strike the ball x millimeters from the center in a specific direction, you cannot possibly compensate beforehand to take advantage of the altered trajectory of the struck ball. It's just a mishit. The more string bed delection, and the greater distance the impact is from the center, the worse result from the mishit.
Also because of the racquet’s power points and extra stability fibers (depending on where the pro stock room placed them when they made the frame) also aid in evening out power and stability on pro stocks.Great explanation about off center hits.
I think this now makes sense.
Who does 93 have more control than 130 ?
You are still using the same 2 inches of string where the ball contacts.
In theory, the racket could be a mile wide. You're still only using that 1% of the strings.
So, why does extra unused string surface matter?
Still don't understand the string deflection assumptions. Let's use a literal trampoline example. Drop a bowling ball into it from 100 feet above. Massive deflection. But, The ball should bounce exactly the same distance every time. Now tighten the trampoline. Now less bounce, but predictable less bounce every time. Both are equally controlled. Deflection has nothing to do with control since the result is identical every time. Predictable means control since the swing will adapt to the amount of deflection.
Like I said just trolling
Massive deflection. But, The ball should bounce exactly the same distance every time. Now tighten the trampoline. Now less bounce, but predictable less bounce every time.
Never understood why people post stuff like this. If I'm trolling, what are you taking the bait? Wouldn't it be smarter to ignore?
People should qualify this with less control of off center hits
They think there's extra cool points, on these boards, for users of Mid size frames.What are they gaining by giving up a larger sweet spot ?
Most pros have an extra sweet spot built in to their racquet.
On a roll here!Also because of the racquet’s power points and extra stability fibers (depending on where the pro stock room placed them when they made the frame) also aid in evening out power and stability on pro stocks.
Haha, I’m still crackin up lolOn a roll here!
They think there's extra cool points, on these boards, for users of Mid size frames.
Also, they are legends in their own minds.
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
I've tried so many frames trying to find the perfect match - Mids, 100s, extended, stiff, soft, open patterns, closed patterns, light, heavy. All I know is that I am a hack at best and the 93-95 inch head with a fairly open pattern feels the best to me. It doesn't change my game, I'm still terrible, but at least the racquet feels right in my hand as I miss.They think there's extra cool points, on these boards, for users of Mid size frames.
Also, they are legends in their own minds.
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
You can make this statement but you had better show the proof and results from lab research to back it up!...I would say though that is consensual that generally and all other things being equal - larger heads have more Power, if you have more power then inherently you have less control both directionally and depthwise...
I've tried so many frames trying to find the perfect match - Mids, 100s, extended, stiff, soft, open patterns, closed patterns, light, heavy. All I know is that I am a hack at best and the 93-95 inch head with a fairly open pattern feels the best to me. It doesn't change my game, I'm still terrible, but at least the racquet feels right in my hand as I miss.
When I strut onto the tennis court and pull out my P93, its instant stares from the ladies. I used to pull out a sissy-100 tweener and get laughed at, but now I just get showered with phone numbers from star stuck cougars.
This is clearly a rough and tumble manly game, and the only way too play it is with a man’s frame - that means midsize or less or go home.
I like the racquet I have and it happens to be a 95. I like its feel. Not its power or control or whatever, just the feel.
TC95 16x19 70RA
Doesn't qualify unless its a real man stick (TWSS). See below.wheres the meme of jolly using nothing but his GPMP to fight off the horde of teenagers w tweeners
This is clearly a rough and tumble manly game, and the only way too play it is with a man’s frame - that means midsize or less or go home.
This is clearly a rough and tumble manly game, and the only way too play it is with a man’s frame - that means midsize or less or go home.
As someone stated, its machismo.
When I strut onto the tennis court and pull out my P93,its instant stares from the ladies. I used to pull out a sissy-100 tweener and get laughed at, but now I just get showered with phone numbers from star stuck cougars.
This is clearly a rough and tumble manly game, and the only way too play it is with a man’s frame - that means midsize or less or go home.
It’s pretty much common knowledge that Fed never actually switched to a 97 and it’s simply a PJ crafted by Peter Fig to give the illusion that he did. This allows any common wuss to think he is playing with “Fed’s racquet”.
If anything, Federer sized down. But Ron Yu and the Tennis Elite will never tell you that because it’s a super secret that only the manliest of men (Breakpoint) will know.
Yep, still rocking my MaxplysThe size of your racquet head is inversely proportional to the size of your wang. #truth
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well in that case I’m swinging that Prince God racquet.The size of your racquet head is inversely proportional to the size of your wang. #truth
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The real size of the Prestige Mid molds before the Graphene was about 89 sqin.I used the Graphene Rev Pro all of last year and just recently decided to move (my arm thanks me) to the Youtek IG Prestige Mid (both 93").
Thats it in a nutshell.If you put a 93 over a 100 inch frame there differences are very slight. Further you gain maneuverability and precision. I love the 93 for my one handed backhand and for volleying.
idk what that has to do with anything but thanks for the info!The real size of the Prestige Mid molds before the Graphene was about 89 sqin.
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
In your post above, you said "both 93" in parenthesis for the Graphene Rev Pro and Youtek IG Mid. I think @BlueB was simply clarifying that Youtek IG Mid in reality was actually 89 and not 93. I understand the point you were making though.idk what that has to do with anything but thanks for the info!
lol, had to Google it. There really is such a thing!Well in that case I’m swinging that Prince God racquet.
What are they gaining by giving up a larger sweet spot ?
Its the less bounce. Remember you have to get the ball IN. If the bounce is too much the ball goes out. In the analogy of the trampoline imagine that there was a ceiling and if the ball bounce too high it would hit the ceiling? Which trampoline are you going to pick to not hit the ceiling?Still don't understand the string deflection assumptions. Let's use a literal trampoline example. Drop a bowling ball into it from 100 feet above. Massive deflection. But, The ball should bounce exactly the same distance every time. Now tighten the trampoline. Now less bounce, but predictable less bounce every time. Both are equally controlled. Deflection has nothing to do with control since the result is identical every time. Predictable means control since the swing will adapt to the amount of deflection.
Its the less bounce. Remember you have to get the ball IN. If the bounce is too much the ball goes out. In the analogy of the trampoline imagine that there was a ceiling and if the ball bounce too high it would hit the ceiling? Which trampoline are you going to pick to not hit the ceiling?
this explains it
In theory, the racket could be a mile wide.