Why does Berdych's GAME play into Nadal's hands?

[furryballs]

berdych is basically an oversized WTA player thats why..for all his power he doesnt seem to get anything on the ball if you know what i mean.

 

[Bender]

I love his tweet yesterday, he loves trolling the haters. Berdych is awesome.

What did it say?

 

[helloworld]

Berdych simply is a kind of a guy who is supposed a walkover for guys in their primes.

Federer, Nadal, Djokovic in their primes would school him everytime.

Berdych is no easy opponent for Federer even in his prime.

 

[SpinToWin]

Berdych is no easy opponent for Federer even in his prime.

right… Federer manhandled Roddick, Safin and Nalbandian and he would have difficulties with Berdych… Get a grip.

 

[NADALRECORD]

Slams;

Nadal - 13
Davydenko - 0

Just sayin'

Torpantennis - I gave nothing away. Note I said '15+ wins'. Still I have given nothing away.

Davydenko leads the h2h but its not convincing. Its only 6-5. And Davydenko has never beaten Nadal on clay, and Davydenko has never beaten Nadal at a slam (and Daydenko is known for being a completely ineffective player in slams compared to non-slams). And it looks like Davydenko is trying to dodge Nadal every time they're a round away from meeting. The only way they'll meet again is in the 1st Round of a slam.

 

[helloworld]

right… Federer manhandled Roddick, Safin and Nalbandian and he would have difficulties with Berdych… Get a grip.

The only one that Fed was able to manhandle was Roddick. Also, young Berdych did beat peak Federer in the Olympics.

 

[abmk]

Berdych is no easy opponent for Federer even in his prime.

yes, he was ... actually watch or check , federer won 9 matches in a row vs him, losing like 4-5 sets total ....

 

[helloworld]

yes, he was ... actually watch or check , federer won 9 matches in a row vs him, losing like 4-5 sets total ....

Federer capitalized on beating young and inexperienced Berdych. Once Berdych raised his game, Federer was no longer able to beat Berdych in slams. That AO victory was a fluke. Berdych had that one in the bag had he not miss that very easy volley.

 

[The Green Mile]

Federer capitalized on beating young and inexperienced Berdych. Once Berdych raised his game, Federer was no longer able to beat Berdych in slams. That AO victory was a fluke. Berdych had that one in the bag had he not miss that very easy volley.

Lets thank the heavens that he did

 

[abmk]

Federer capitalized on beating young and inexperienced Berdych. Once Berdych raised his game, Federer was no longer able to beat Berdych in slams. That AO victory was a fluke. Berdych had that one in the bag had he not miss that very easy volley.

what a load of BS.

federer beat berdych in straights @ FO 06, wimbledon 06, AO 08 without breaking into a sweat. Berdych got sh*t lucky with those wins vs past his prime federer in wim 10 ( had leg injury ) & USO 12

peak federer would've dominated berdych of 10-13 as well, barely losing sets, no question ...A match that amply demonstrates this is Paris 11 SF where Berdych himself said that when federer played like he did - like the federer of the old, he had very little chance.