Why Federer will be regarded as better than even Pete

Now you're just invoking the VB hymn.

Who exactly was Pete's competition on grass? Ivanisevic? Rafter? Pioline?

Nadal was anything but a baby on grass in 2006 and 2007.

So unless you have a better argument than "muh Fed beat mugs", this conversation is over.

Will you consider Djokovic a better Wimbledon player than Fed if he wins 2 more Wimbledon ? if not for COVID he would have been gunning for his 8th title, that's crazy.
 
The questions will remain and be argued forever. Pete didn’t let two guys bully him all across the circuit at the end of the day and sit there while they left him in the dust on the raise of the road. He ripped out their hearts and destroyed their confidence on the big stage. Fed just let his rivals gain more momentum and confidence every time they played him. Whether people want to admit or not, Nadal/Nole surpassing Fed only increases Pete’s legacy even more. Pete was the undisputed BEST of his era. Fed isn’t even 2nd anymore after Nadal won Australia

you can’t compare the 3rd greatest to the
greatest. Just doesn’t work that way. The 4 best are now Pete, Laver,djokovic and Nadal. I don’t know who’s gonna win the GOAT race between Nadal and djoker but we know one thing is certain now…. Fed won’t
 
Last edited:
220px-Bolivian_rose_salt.jpg
A much needed suppository. Enjoy the cleanse.
 
fed is better than pete. petes main rival was doing meth for goodness sake and who knows what else for a time..
compare that to how seriously rafa and djoko take it... no contest
 
Are we allowed (morally speaking) to completely change the content of a post a long time later? It's rewriting history. Besides it f*cks up the discussion.
The original text is cited in post #16.
It is grossly immoral! Ban thread. Delete OP
 
Back
Top