Why is it that when Nadal loses early at a Slam, good things happen?

[tlm]

Exactly! Somehow that simple fact went right over Clarky's head.

Okay well at least you are honest.

 

[Clarky21]

You hate him and you love Federer, friggin face it. No need to be all diplomatic and eloquent. You know who you are, quit playing stupid games.

Stubborn old farts who think they are smart p*ss me off, seriously.

The bolded describes Poly perfectly.

 

[BreakPoint]

You hate him and you love Federer, friggin face it. No need to be all diplomatic and eloquent. You know who you are, quit playing stupid games.

Stubborn old farts who think they are smart p*ss me off, seriously.

I love Nadal even more when he loses early and allows others to make the final.

 

[BreakPoint]

Okay well at least you are honest.

I'm always honest.

Nadal is a far worse match-up for Federer than Federer is for Nadal. Who doesn't know that?

 

[15_ounce]

Good things happen, because the bad things disappear. No more time violations, no more on court coaching, no more loud grunting on top of your lung, no more Parera makarena.

 

[Clarky21]

Yes, you share the same sentiment with just about everyone I come into contact with.

You greatly overestimate your mental prowess,Poly.


Oh,and do you think Nadal would be able to beat 1.0's down at the local weekend warrior club if they banned poly strings?

 

[Sentinel]

The thing is I didn't even read his entire original post. I can't take someone like him seriously after reading his blather in the "BAN POLY STRINGS NOW!!" thread. Besides,I responded to what DRII said because I thought it was funny. Nothing more nothing less,Sentigif.

Quit getting baited, Clarky

 

[Clarky21]

Quit getting baited, Clarky

You're right,Sentigif. I should know better considering the thread starter.