Atennisone
Hall of Fame
Looking at the results since 2000, US Open has helped a lot of "inconsistent" players win Grand Slam/s.
Facts:
Safin has 1/2 of his slams in UO
Hewitt has 1/2 of his slams in UO
Roddick has his only Grand Slam in UO
It's the third toughest slam for Federer
del Potro has his only Grand Slam in UO , and his only finals.
It's the third toughest slam for Djokovic
Murray lost his 4 first slam finals against Federer/Djokovic, but as soon as he met one of them in UO final he won.
It's the only non-clay tournament where Nadal is much better than Djokovic
Cilic has his only Grand Slam in UO
Anderson came as a 31-year old who had reached 1 QF as his best in Grand Slams and seeded 28, and then reached his first Grand Slam final in UO.
It's the only slam where Nadal and Federer has not managed to go deep enough to meet each other.
Some facts, as the Safin, Hewitt, Murray etc. are not 1/1.000.000 rare but some of the facts tells us that UO is kind of the Grand Slam of suprises, what causes this?
Facts:
Safin has 1/2 of his slams in UO
Hewitt has 1/2 of his slams in UO
Roddick has his only Grand Slam in UO
It's the third toughest slam for Federer
del Potro has his only Grand Slam in UO , and his only finals.
It's the third toughest slam for Djokovic
Murray lost his 4 first slam finals against Federer/Djokovic, but as soon as he met one of them in UO final he won.
It's the only non-clay tournament where Nadal is much better than Djokovic
Cilic has his only Grand Slam in UO
Anderson came as a 31-year old who had reached 1 QF as his best in Grand Slams and seeded 28, and then reached his first Grand Slam final in UO.
It's the only slam where Nadal and Federer has not managed to go deep enough to meet each other.
Some facts, as the Safin, Hewitt, Murray etc. are not 1/1.000.000 rare but some of the facts tells us that UO is kind of the Grand Slam of suprises, what causes this?