This evoked a really bad pun involving physicists of old collectively turning in their graves and producing a knock on effect disturbing a certain tectonic plate. I won't mention it for sensitivity's sake.Simple physics. Speed = acceleration + mass.
This evoked a really bad pun involving physicists of old collectively turning in their graves and producing a knock on effect disturbing a certain tectonic plate. I won't mention it for sensitivity's sake.
Sorry, but you are wrong. And I repeated 6th grade three times, so trust me, I know a lot more about basic physics than majority who only go in one grade just for a year.
Lol at all the people saying or implying that Nadal and freaking Andy Murray are too muscular/bulky. These cats are tremendous athletes in their own right, but I would wager that at least 75% of HIGH SCHOOL running backs who'll never play college ball are bigger and stronger than both of them. No wonder most people think tennis is for wusses.
Agree. Djokovic as well has a good body for tennis.
Nadal and Murray are too bulked up.
Oh really? :lol:Simple physics. Speed = acceleration + mass.
You don't say...I don't know what I'm saying, I'm tired, hope at least some of it is true
Might as well stop running in case I injure my ankle
even nadal himself does not have much arm muscle compared to his old self.
^ LOL. Squatting and deadlifting make you better at lifting barbells up (and ruining your spine, eventually). If you want to get better at tennis - do more tennis drills, run sprints, do plyometrics and other anaerobic exercises.
Squatting and deadlifting are core stability exercises
squatting and deadlifting which done correctly will never result in an injury
Yes....curious that.
You mean it is curious that Federer has such a differential betweer arms. Much more so than Nadal, who plays his non-dominant arm.
I get why Fed fans believe fed is on roids.
The curios case of Roger Federer?
I get why Fed fans believe fed is on roids.
He basically a baseliner (2003-2007) and he play one-handed. Why is his right arm so small and not muscular? . Unlike his leg, so muscular
Fed is a lean and mean athlete!
If you want an awesome core stability exercise that translates much better to tennis, try soccer or basketball.
Go to a gym and try finding a deadlifter/squatter over 50. There are lots of young guys there, there are some older guys there as well, but they are not deadlifting. Can you guess why? People do not just give up what they spend years and years to get better at.
People get injured, and "done correctly" is a myth that only works for robots. Someone who is progressively overloading their spine is one mistake, one freak accident away from a debilitating injury. Mistakes get exponentially more frequent if one is distracted, depressed, unfocused, not feeling well or is simply performing several repetitions and getting progressively more and more exhausted. Mandatory good form + exhaustion => recipe for a disaster.
Do not read bro-science on the web. Ask a physical therapist, and they will tell you if the delicate and fragile human spine is well-suited for top-down barbell overloads.
And hey, I am not stopping you.
Roger is just made for tennis. A pair of strong legs and little weight on his upper body to carry around. Relatively thin arms yes, but reptile-fast.
A tortoise is a reptile. May win the race but not very fast.
With a nice little potbellyFed is a lean and mean athlete!
...Why is his right arm so small and not muscular?
Perhaps he's using other 'means' to achieve power ???He basically a baseliner (2003-2007) and he play one-handed. Why is his right arm so small and not muscular? . Unlike his leg, so muscular
I think Federer has considerably bulked up in the last couple of years. He looks stronger physically now than he did in 2013.
Because by then he was already with Mirka.
(if you know what I mean )
Yea you're right, most people are ignorant.UW_Husky88 said:Lol at all the people saying or implying that Nadal and freaking Andy Murray are too muscular/bulky. These cats are tremendous athletes in their own right, but I would wager that at least 75% of HIGH SCHOOL running backs who'll never play college ball are bigger and stronger than both of them. No wonder most people think tennis is for wusses.
I know it's counter-intuitive, but the heavier your racquet, the less muscles you need to swing it and hit the ball as hard. That's because you can have the heavier racquet do most of the work for you while with a lighter racquet you need to use more of your own muscles to hit the ball hard since you don't have as much momentum from the racquet itself when you swing it. That's why with a heavier racquet you can swing smoothly and let the racquet's momentum take over while with a lighter racquet you often end up "muscling" the ball.His raquet is heavier than Nadal's
big muscles are all but useless in tennis or Michael Muscles Russell would be top 10
Djokovic is trying to turn himself to a piece of rubber.Agree. Djokovic as well has a good body for tennis.
Nadal and Murray are too bulked up.
Lol @ goat wrist. But you are right, the guy is so incredibly flexible in his wrists. And has big calves, along with a strong core. His fh has been clocked at over 100mph, goes to show big muscles don't mean much.fed has very broad shoulders, much bigger than Nadal. Huge legs too. Tennis is more about wrist anyways and Federer has the GOAT wrist...arm muscles don't matter for tennis especially for a guy who hits with a straight arm and naturally generates leverage.
Safin was a BEAST out there, but he has slim arms as well: