Why Roger's arm never increase any muscles?

cknobman

Legend
Who cares about Fed's arms I WANT HIS LEGS!!

Massively impressive leg muscles that are the foundation supporting his movement and power.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
Simple physics. Speed = acceleration + mass.
This evoked a really bad pun involving physicists of old collectively turning in their graves and producing a knock on effect disturbing a certain tectonic plate. I won't mention it for sensitivity's sake.
 

Bender

G.O.A.T.
This evoked a really bad pun involving physicists of old collectively turning in their graves and producing a knock on effect disturbing a certain tectonic plate. I won't mention it for sensitivity's sake.


Please, be my / our guest?
 

THE FIGHTER

Hall of Fame
Lol at all the people saying or implying that Nadal and freaking Andy Murray are too muscular/bulky. These cats are tremendous athletes in their own right, but I would wager that at least 75% of HIGH SCHOOL running backs who'll never play college ball are bigger and stronger than both of them. No wonder most people think tennis is for wusses.

90% of those said high school runningbacks will never make the high school tennis team.

Most power lifter hopefuls will never get into juliard.
 

DolgoSantoro

Professional
Easier to remove and cook as a giant noodle in case of emergency situations. Doing so wouldn't even hamper his tennis game much.
 

Moveforwardalways

Hall of Fame
1. These guys are swinging a racquet that is a max of 400 grams. We are talking about grams here. They are not power lifters by any stretch.

2. Power in tennis comes from RHS and timing. Winning comes from movement. Neither come from bicep curls.

3. If you want to get better at tennis - squat, deadlift, power clean.
 

Netspirit

Hall of Fame
^ LOL. Squatting and deadlifting make you better at lifting barbells up (and ruining your spine, eventually). If you want to get better at tennis - do more tennis drills, run sprints, do plyometrics and other anaerobic exercises.
 

scotus

G.O.A.T.
Why Roger's arms never get bigger?

Possibly because Milka uses them as her pillow every night, cutting off all circulations and sucking the life out of them. :)
 

HipRotation

Hall of Fame
^ LOL. Squatting and deadlifting make you better at lifting barbells up (and ruining your spine, eventually). If you want to get better at tennis - do more tennis drills, run sprints, do plyometrics and other anaerobic exercises.

Anaerobic exercises like weight lifting? Squatting and deadlifting are core stability exercises and are hugely applicable to tennis especially in the serve, it's the number one place where power is generated and every time you hit a shot or even move you're engaging your core. If you want to have a stronger core you exercise it and ironic to your post, unlike squatting and deadlifting which done correctly will never result in an injury, you're way more likely to injury yourself using tennis as the only means to build core due to the asymmetrical nature of the sport, it is not a continuous repetition sport and most of the time you're engaging one side of the body.
 

Netspirit

Hall of Fame
Squatting and deadlifting are core stability exercises

If you want an awesome core stability exercise that translates much better to tennis, try soccer or basketball.

squatting and deadlifting which done correctly will never result in an injury

Go to a gym and try finding a deadlifter/squatter over 50. There are lots of young guys there, there are some older guys there as well, but they are not deadlifting. Can you guess why? People do not just give up what they spend years and years to get better at.

People get injured, and "done correctly" is a myth that only works for robots. Someone who is progressively overloading their spine is one mistake, one freak accident away from a debilitating injury. Mistakes get exponentially more frequent if one is distracted, depressed, unfocused, not feeling well or is simply performing several repetitions and getting progressively more and more exhausted. Mandatory good form + exhaustion => recipe for a disaster.

Do not read bro-science on the web. Ask a physical therapist, and they will tell you if the delicate and fragile human spine is well-suited for top-down barbell overloads.

YdzwT.png


And hey, I am not stopping you.
 
Last edited:

Disputaciones

New User
He basically a baseliner (2003-2007) and he play one-handed. Why is his right arm so small and not muscular? :confused: . Unlike his leg, so muscular

I wonder the same too, and why he has no abs either.

You would think with all that HIIT-style running that tennis is, they would all be ripped, but this isn't the case.

But you can build super strength without adding little if any muscle at all actually; they call this "wiry strength".
 

Sysyphus

Talk Tennis Guru
If you want an awesome core stability exercise that translates much better to tennis, try soccer or basketball.



Go to a gym and try finding a deadlifter/squatter over 50. There are lots of young guys there, there are some older guys there as well, but they are not deadlifting. Can you guess why? People do not just give up what they spend years and years to get better at.

People get injured, and "done correctly" is a myth that only works for robots. Someone who is progressively overloading their spine is one mistake, one freak accident away from a debilitating injury. Mistakes get exponentially more frequent if one is distracted, depressed, unfocused, not feeling well or is simply performing several repetitions and getting progressively more and more exhausted. Mandatory good form + exhaustion => recipe for a disaster.

Do not read bro-science on the web. Ask a physical therapist, and they will tell you if the delicate and fragile human spine is well-suited for top-down barbell overloads.

YdzwT.png


And hey, I am not stopping you.

Wow, you are spreading some misleading info in this thread.

Firstly: No, squatting and deadlifting doesn't just make you better at lifting barbells. Not at all. They are maybe the two exercises with the best transitional value of all. Just look at pro track and field athletes. Even the longer-distance runners lift weights, and research supports the benefit of it even there. No reason some lifting in a tennis training program wouldn't be beneficial. Look at Azarenka's new training regimen for instance: plenty of compound and olympic lifting. Shouldn't be overdone in tennis of course, given that the focus should always be on practicing on court.

And secondly, squats and deadlifts aren't bad for your spine if done correctly. In fact, if done right, they simply strengthen the spine, core, and increase bone-mass/strength, and work tremendously for injury prevention. Actually, tennis in itself is much, much worse for the body.
 

Knife

Professional
Roger is just made for tennis. A pair of strong legs and little weight on his upper body to carry around. Relatively thin arms yes, but reptile-fast.
 

rossi46

Professional
As long as his arms are long enough to put them around Mirka that's all that should matter and the way things are going he needs to start doing some arm lengthening exercises if such a thing exists.
 

zep

Hall of Fame
I think Federer has considerably bulked up in the last couple of years. He looks stronger physically now than he did in 2013.
 

Krish872007

Talk Tennis Guru
I think Federer has considerably bulked up in the last couple of years. He looks stronger physically now than he did in 2013.

Yeah he does. He was actually stronger in the 2002-2006 period (visibly so) - he then thinned noticeably between 2007-2010, maybe increased slightly in 2011 but then went down again. Now he's almost back in muscular shape
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
One thing Fed also has are massive shoulders. His shoulders dwarf any other guy out there. It's also a big reason he wears his clothes so well and he looks so good in his clothes- the broad shoulders:
0cabca1b15534dec7d098df3d6866c79.jpg


Rafa has bigger biceps, obviously, but his shoulders are not especially big.
rafael-nadal-shirtless-01.jpg
 

Aretium

Hall of Fame
Legs are where it is at. I would kill for Fed's legs. They are all purpose muscles. Same goes for most tennis players. Their legs are perfect.
 

metsman

Talk Tennis Guru
fed has very broad shoulders, much bigger than Nadal. Huge legs too. Tennis is more about wrist anyways and Federer has the GOAT wrist...arm muscles don't matter for tennis especially for a guy who hits with a straight arm and naturally generates leverage.
 

Sander001

Hall of Fame
UW_Husky88 said:
Lol at all the people saying or implying that Nadal and freaking Andy Murray are too muscular/bulky. These cats are tremendous athletes in their own right, but I would wager that at least 75% of HIGH SCHOOL running backs who'll never play college ball are bigger and stronger than both of them. No wonder most people think tennis is for wusses.
Yea you're right, most people are ignorant.
 

Enga

Hall of Fame
The thing that should be noted is how developed his forearm and elbow area are. That is some extreme muscles when you consider how thick they are. I think such muscles must be perfect for avoiding injury, really allowing him to generate massive speeds without hurting his tendons.

I think tennis players are ideally lean. I think muscles create a lot of extra power, but its only good for a baseliner. Extra mass when at the net makes it difficult to change direction quickly, and you dont really need extra power at the net.
 

BreakPoint

Bionic Poster
His raquet is heavier than Nadal's:):):)
I know it's counter-intuitive, but the heavier your racquet, the less muscles you need to swing it and hit the ball as hard. That's because you can have the heavier racquet do most of the work for you while with a lighter racquet you need to use more of your own muscles to hit the ball hard since you don't have as much momentum from the racquet itself when you swing it. That's why with a heavier racquet you can swing smoothly and let the racquet's momentum take over while with a lighter racquet you often end up "muscling" the ball.

Sampras used a 14 oz., 400 SW racquet but he wasn't that muscular, either.

sampras-hairy.jpg
 

syc23

Professional
big muscles are all but useless in tennis or Michael Muscles Russell would be top 10

If there was anyone who looked more d-bag on the tennis court, Michael Russell is it. Yes wearing sleeveless tees will make him play like Rafa no?
 

Charlemagne

Hall of Fame
fed has very broad shoulders, much bigger than Nadal. Huge legs too. Tennis is more about wrist anyways and Federer has the GOAT wrist...arm muscles don't matter for tennis especially for a guy who hits with a straight arm and naturally generates leverage.
Lol @ goat wrist. But you are right, the guy is so incredibly flexible in his wrists. And has big calves, along with a strong core. His fh has been clocked at over 100mph, goes to show big muscles don't mean much.
 
Top