Corrections happen all the time, no? At least in tennis matches I watch. I feel that people are too emotionally invested in what happened to have a detached look at it. The points were replayed, no harm no foul, great chance to get a first serve in and win the point if you're a good player. What would the Mighty Ancic say? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fWh7O6c6dc
It's inconsistent. I think that's what gets to the players - the chair is only supposed to intervene if he/she thinks it's a glaring error. When proved wrong it becomes obvious 'glaring' means different things to different people.
Come on Hawk-eye company! Advances in computing should allow every close call to be quickly analyzed and the results sent to the chair's tablet.
Corrections happen all the time, no? At least in tennis matches I watch. ..The points were replayed, no harm no foul, great chance to get a first serve in and win the point if you're a good player
Well, in Dimitrov's case the first point was replayed when he should have won it outright since the wrong 'out' call cam after Murray had played his shot. I don't think that serve was even replayed since Dimitrov has already moved to the ad side to serve.
Replaying a point should be used as a last resort, not as a crutch for bad umpires.