Why the most weird looking FH is actually the most natural

acintya

Legend
Try it because:

1. This motion has inbuilt racquet drop - you dont need to worry about dropping the racquet - its auto if you hold the racquet with small pressure

2. it is the most efficient if you are using a heavier racquet (remember Sampras and Lendl)

3. it is a continuous motion - unlike manny other forehands which can be broken down in different parts (Macy lessons)
All pro forehand are a continuous motion -dont get me wrong but this one is the one with most elbow lead involved.this is the continuous motion of the natural body.

4. it is the most feel based of all forehand - because the swing is kinda long and you need to feel it from the beginning to the end

5. this forehand was away for a long time - nextgens like Kachanov, Thiem, Medvedev, Kyrgios brought it back in a modern setting.

6. although it is not the most compact stroke (James Blake was an exception) it can be unleashed really fast (Kyrgios style) with super power.

7. With this type of forehand I think you can have the biggest racquet head speed of all the motions because you pull the racquet back with the elbow and already can generate fast speed on the way backwards and then after the drop the energy and speed just changes direction and BAM.

8. the ELBOW is the king and I call it the most natural swing of them all

9. i will never say it has the biggest control - because we could debate on that topic because obvious - Djokovic and Federer - they are on the other side

10. it is hotter than you think - i found that out when i tried to hit the FH with my non dominant hand. And what is extra interesting is that it seems that this forehand doesnt need so much training as the "regular" FH that is beeing teached nowadays. again - because of the FEELing you have

it has also some drawbacks like but you will need to figure out alone which ones these are.

 
Last edited:

BetaServe

Professional
again, people tend to think a player's strokes are superior than others' just because he's winning. He had the exact same FH a year ago and why didn't you make any thread about it?
I have a feeling if one day Medvedev gets to the top people will start making threads like "Why having ugly strokes is better" with Medvedev as their reference/role model (actually you already made one @acintya )
 

acintya

Legend
again, people tend to think a player's strokes are superior than others' just because he's winning. He had the exact same FH a year ago and why didn't you make any thread about it?
I have a feeling if one day Medvedev gets to the top people will start making threads like "Why having ugly strokes is better" with Medvedev as their reference/role model (actually you already made one @acintya )
i made a thread yes:) trust me its not because of Medvedev... im not that type of guy :D
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
again, people tend to think a player's strokes are superior than others' just because he's winning. He had the exact same FH a year ago and why didn't you make any thread about it?
I have a feeling if one day Medvedev gets to the top people will start making threads like "Why having ugly strokes is better" with Medvedev as their reference/role model (actually you already made one @acintya )
Medvedev is winning despite a below-average forehand for his level. But he makes cleaner contact than the more spin-reliant guys.
 

FiReFTW

Legend
people like you dont understand the difference between a HIGH to LOW to HIGH forehand and LOW to HIGH to LOW to HIGH forehand.

lol what? Medvedev has the same forehand loop as pretty much most ATP players, only the size of the loop and takeback differs. He unit turns and takes the racquet high then drops it low and swings high. Same for pretty much 99% of ATP players.
 

ReopeningWed

Professional
people like you dont understand the difference between a HIGH to LOW to HIGH forehand and LOW to HIGH to LOW to HIGH forehand.
Yo I don't understand 90% of the nonsense that comes out of this board. You're looking at the wrong things at his stroke and giving a bunch of made up names to something that's already well understood.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
It is not the ideal angle but it looks as if his racket face in more closed at impact than the 5-10 degrees I'd usually expect. It would be good to get a side view to better see how closed the racket head is at impact.

He drags his right foot and that movements look s different, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Top